this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2025
1035 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

73655 readers
4148 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Prominent backbench MP Sarah Champion launched a campaign against VPNs previously, saying: “My new clause 54 would require the Secretary of State to publish, within six months of the Bill’s passage, a report on the effect of VPN use on Ofcom’s ability to enforce the requirements under clause 112.

"If VPNs cause significant issues, the Government must identify those issues and find solutions, rather than avoiding difficult problems.” And the Labour Party said there were “gaps” in the bill that needed to be amended.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago

"We will force you to do what we want", democracy in action

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 52 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Isn't this currently what Russia is trying to do with their internet?

[–] Maxxie@piefed.blahaj.zone 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's something russia has been doing for a decade and got pretty good at.

A long term blanket vpn ban is not compatible with a modern digital infrastructure, but with certain protocols (openvpn, wireguard) they can detect their usage and filter them out when necessary.

It does require a lot of expensive DPI (deep packet inspection) hardware I'm not sure UK has, so building a Great Firewall of Britain (Hadrian's Firewall?) will take some time.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Wooki@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

"Safety" meanwhile these same mp's can't budget can't run critical public services like bloody hospitals.

But don't worry, your thoughts and activity are policed.

Democratic failure to prioritise and run a country at its finest on display for the world to see. The waste is astounding.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] portnull@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zoldyck@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Why not just ban all human rights while you're at it?

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Little by little!
Can't do it all at once or the ~~peasants~~ populace might catch on!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frenchfryenjoyer@lemmings.world 44 points 1 week ago (6 children)

They can come and pry TOR from my cold dead hands lmfao

this law can eat shit. i ain't gonna dox myself and feed my personal info to companies. maybe they should take this as a hint that most people care about their privacy

if you don't want kids seeing NSFW stuff be an actual parent and don't raise your kids on the internet??

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago
[–] JK_Flip_Flop@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If this comes to anything I'm moving to somewhere in the EU and pursuing citizenship there. This is clearly not about protecting the children anymore (not that it ever was).

[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 42 points 1 week ago (7 children)

EU is about to do the exact same thing. Norway is the place to be. That's where I went - at least according to my ip address.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 43 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

apparently having a functioning brain isn't a requirement of being an mp

but of course we knew that when she did this in 2019:

On 16 July 2019, Champion stated: "If my party comes out as a remain party rather than trying to find a deal or >rather than trying to exit, I can't support that, it goes against democracy". She said she would rather support a "no-deal Brexit" than remain in the EU, as she believed Labour had to deliver the result of the 2016 referendum.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 week ago

If VPNs cause significant issues, the Government must identify those issues and find solutions, rather than avoiding difficult problems

Your law is the difficult problem you daft cunt

[–] thenose@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Show me a ban that didn’t came with 10x problems. People have their needs even the filthy ones. Especially the filthy ones. Hence will find a way to fulfill it. If there’s no legal way to do so the demand will create an alternative market for it to match the demand…more trouble on the way if that’s the lane the UK choose

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 37 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Not even China can ban VPN entirely, because businesses use it as a security measure.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Jimbabwe@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Next up, zeros and/or ones

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] socialsecurity@piefed.social 36 points 1 week ago

But they can't seem to muster up the "political" will to tax the rich

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 34 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Labour are not governing for the people, and they are not the Labour party anymore.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kemsat@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The UK is the testing grounds. After they figure it out, they’ll be rolling it out everywhere else.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 week ago

This online safety bill is dishonest. This has nothing to do with safety and everything to do with money.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And there's the other shoe dropping with VPNs now. Didn't even take them an extra fucking year

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] falynns@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago

"Hey! Stop using well known workarounds to my idiot demands! Surely this is brand new technology that no one could have known about!"

[–] Ronno@feddit.nl 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Stop defending yourself, and let me hit you" vibes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bubbey@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Even the CCP can't stop VPNs... good luck UK

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Luouth@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Bye bye UK economy. How do you expect businesses to work without VPNs?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] TheOrionArm@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (4 children)

How is this even feasible? People need them for work, business, school etc. The UK is going nuts with the attempts to regulate the internet.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"If VPNs cause significant issues, the Government must identify those issues and find solutions, rather than avoiding difficult problems.”

When I was a kid, Reddit and general public Internet access weren't things, but I sure managed to get my hands on pornography. I'm pretty confident that even entirely killing Internet access isn't going to stop kids who want to get ahold of porn from getting ahold of it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ReiRose@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] krigo666@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

Ah, fascism on the rise.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›