this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2025
1599 points (94.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

8807 readers
1871 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 252 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

My wife has accused me of mansplaining when I really was just sharing the information I had in my head about "the thing" because I was proud of myself about that.

There's also the "You may already know all this, but it's worth saying out loud anyway."

I'm not saying mansplaining isn't a thing - it certainly is - but there are other innocent "info dump" kinds of things that can look like mansplaining but weren't intended to be. I try to be very clear about why I am info dumping when I do, but I'm not always able to catch myself in time.

#TouchOfTheTism

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 82 points 2 weeks ago

Exactly, when I tell my therapist about the funny things I learned about psychology, it's just me saying stuff that I know now, how I think it's cool, and asking for further information. I'm well aware that he already knows far more on the topic. If you're explaining it with a tone of "you fucking idiot woman, I'm educating you", then that's mansplaining. Another important possibility, is just phrasing a question as a statement for clarification. Think of how a waiter will repeat your order back to you at a restaraunt. I do the same thing when I learn about a new concept. I repeat back what I think I understood about something to make sure I got it right. Tone is very important. If I don't sound like I'm trying to be a dick to you, then I'm probably not.

[–] Banana@sh.itjust.works 40 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah the intention is far easier to sus out when it's in person, especially with a known person. I'm a woman and I have ADHD and I do this to my husband all the time.

[–] grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org 33 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (6 children)

My partner has taught/trained me to ask "would you like to hear more?" before I info-dump on him.

Example: Me: "at work today I've been playing around with configuration settings for Primo VE, specifically the search scopes... Um... would you like to hear more?"

Response: "I'm glad you have an interesting problem at work and no, no thank you."

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You are a starship troopers propaganda video. Would you like to know more?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I've had this experience before. I was excited to talk about what I learnt whilst volunteering for a war museum, and wanted to share my excitement with people. Got accused of Mansplaining. It really was upsetting, since I was just talking about a lovely experience and didn't want to upset nor offend anyone...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 weeks ago

I am very guilty of asking people if they know about something then telling them anyway.

Too many cases of people confidently telling me they know about computers, point to the monitor and tell me it's a CPU, then proudly call the computer under their desk the hard drive. The only reason their "CPU" won't turn on being they need to press the power button on the monitor.

[–] ButteryMonkey@piefed.social 19 points 2 weeks ago

As a fellow autist, but also a cis woman person, I think there’s a genuine and clear difference between the two, but.. I viscerally understand infodumps when the other person already knows..

You gas yourself up so much to share the thing and they are like.. mmhmm. Deflation city. And it’s hard to stop yourself from sharing your own personal understanding of things with people, even if they can correct you, which you hope they will do if you are wrong, omg that would be amazing!

That contrasts so hard with the condescending “I know more than you” attitude. Because the things those dipshits pick to harp on are usually the more superficial aspects of the thing.

Like that’s nice, I’m glad you know the specific term for the thing, genuinely, now let’s proceed from our mutual understanding and iron out the details together!

But that’s really different from someone who talks over you, is wrong, won’t be proven wrong, don’t care or know all that much (like dunning kruger sort of thing)

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Beebabe@lemmy.world 141 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (372 children)

So I’ve noticed this post isn’t going over very well. I’d like to add a female perspective.

“Mansplain” isn’t meant to say you info dump or over explain a thing. It means that you assume you know more simply based on sex. It’s a type of misogyny that’s more typically overt in boomer culture, but it’s got a following in the whole Tate movement. I have rarely noticed it outside of that generation in the wild.

Now…Guys do infodump, which leads to this confusion, because a lot of people dislike that behavior too. Statistically women do speak less in mixed groups. Put it all together and it’s easy for people to over generalize a very specific behavior. It does happen, but compared to previous generations it’s not as common. It definitely occurs to women who work in non-traditional fields and take on non-traditional roles and I suspect that the same is true for men.

[–] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Infodumping male here, I generally do it because in my mind context is important to make sense, and of course I do it regardless of gender. It honestly feels like a detriment, as I feel myself taking too long, but don't really know how to shorten it. I do it when explaining issues at work or when talking about stuff I like etc, but have audio has times where I tried to be brief then got the wrong info across or forgot to mention something important or just right make sense. It's like I can't find the right balance between explaining and dumping.

I didn't find this post as an insult or anything though.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 32 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I had a woman at a car service counter take in my car once. She was dressed nicely and clean so of course I assumed she only did paperwork.

I treated her like a human. Explained my car symptoms and where I think the problem is. (Car electric went nuts and lost power steering when i hit a puddle.)

Holy crap she knew her stuff. I mentioned it felt like the alternator wasnt performing right and undervolting, but since it's only when driving threw a puddle it had to be a component siezing and pulling on the accessory belt. She agreed that's a good place to start and ran through all the bits in that system as well as thier diagnostic steps planned.

I figured she knew about cars but it felt like she was a full on mechanic and was the manager dressed up.

[–] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 22 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Treating people with basic humanity should be the bare minimum, but sadly it's a foregone conclusion.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 29 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Info dump goes both ways, men usually info dump about things, women info dump about people. Its echoed in men vs women photography of trips also. Men typically photograph things (here's a car/bike/castle I saw), and typically women photograph people.( here's me and my sister, here's a court yard with people dancing)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DrSoap@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Imagine going to school for years and years. You have your doctorate. You're in the field for 10 years. You work in field that is 93% male. You find a new job, good pay and reputable. The boss on the daily explains things to you. Some things that are just basic science and not even directly applicable to your work. No other new hires get these interesting and informative chats but what a coincidence, all the other new hires are men. I never called it "mansplaining," it's just sexism. One cute word doesn't capture the malice that is often behind it and makes men who view themselves as harmless defensive. Of course there is pointing out systemic sexism that is ingrained in natural behavior but its important to note the difference in a simple conversation and singling out a woman to explain something while assuming she doesn't have anything in that pretty little head of hers. Personally hence, I've noticed it used most often when the woman you're targeting is smarter than you and this is a subtle power play to remind her of her place.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (368 replies)
[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 106 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

Unfortunately I am autistic and explaining something I think is cool. Only it gets interpreted as condescension :(

Its not always but its often enough

[–] lemjukes@sopuli.xyz 54 points 2 weeks ago

Bingo, every fucking time. I'm literally just sharing whats in my head. You know, trying to communicate like a fucking person? Sorry you took that as me thinking you were stupid. Because now i definitely think you're stupid.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

As someone with friends and family on the spectrum, my best tip:

Take a moment to breathe when you've completed a thought related to what you're explaining, and look at the other person to see if they have information to share, questions, or just to express what they know.

This helped a few folks pace themselves, and the break for others they believe helped in not appearing condescending.

Hope this helps!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 84 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (36 children)

I hate how the term "mansplaining" has mutated from "When a man condescendingly explains a subject to a woman who is an expert in that subject, because he assumes being a woman makes her ignorant", which is certainly a valid thing to be upset about, into "Whenever a man explains anything to any woman" , which is sexist and divisive.

The term is still pretty sexist as originally used though. It inherently implies that it's a characteristic masculine behavior. If you disagree, allow me to demonstrate:

I just came up with this term, "womancomplaining", it's when a woman exaggerates a minor inconvenience into a targeted victimization.

How does that term make you feel? Does it seem to imply that I'm talking about a specific, isolated behavior? Or does it seem more like I'm implying this is a characteristic feminine behavior? Would it feel less sexist if I insisted I wasn't talking about all women, but if you take offense then maybe you feel defensive about being a womancomplainer? What if I told you to calm down, because if you aren't guilty of it then I'm not talking about you?

It still seems pretty sexist, doesn't it.

[–] ZeffSyde@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I think the insulting part of mansplaining is the assumptive nature of it.

This can all be avoided by a soft check before explaining something, rather than assuming a boy/girl/chimp wouldn't know the first thing about welding/cooking/crochet/throwing feces.

Whenever I have the urge to info dump about a topic I'll probe with a, 'You may very well know more about this than I, please let me know before it becomes tiresome.' 10 out of 10 it works, and usually both of us learn something.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (35 replies)
[–] jeff@programming.dev 73 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I like how OOP gets the name wrong also. Shane not Shawn. It really makes it feel extra condescending.

[–] egrets@lemmy.world 70 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

C'mon Bront. Every dog is a perfect 13/10.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mustakrakish@lemmy.world 62 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Unironically, thats how I feel explaining things when I get excited, and I kinda like being a kid excited about sharing something. Because either I get to share something I find really cool and you hopefully do too, or you already knew about it and maybe know more than me and I can learn something more about the thing I'm excited about. But mansplaining does imply a level of condescension that I really fucking hope I don't come across as.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ConstantPain@lemmy.world 55 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I explain basic things to anyone if they sound or act like they don't know.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 2 weeks ago (14 children)

I also love explaining things and get excited when it's an area i know about, and then got accused of mansplaining. seeing that many men in these comments suffered the same fate, maybe some women could become more chill lol

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 51 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

I'm not mansplaining I'm tism info dumping. If you want to patronize me go for it. I'll keep going

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I would, of course, mistake the condescension for genuine and sincere interest. I have found a nerd buddy. Once I'm done dumping, you can dump on me. This is so cool.

Oh wait... You're being mean. How heart breaking. I'll go climb into my little dark hole.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] socsa@piefed.social 18 points 2 weeks ago

Fr. Sorry that I have 30 years of experience in this area and have observed that you are making the same fundamental errors I made when I had less than 30 years of experience in this area. Fuck me for trying to help, I guess.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 50 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (16 children)

As a man with adhd, I do this all the time to men and to women, and I've been accused of mansplaining. I'm working on it, but I promise it has nothing to do with sexism. I just think everybody needs to know all the details so rhey can reach the same conclusions as me.

And for what it's worth, I really appreciate when someone does the same for me on a topic I don't know about. But I understand how frustrating it is when someone does it on a subject I do know about, so I always try to gauge knowledge before info dumping. What catches me off guard is when someone isn't interested in learning. They don't know everything, and they are just OK with walking through life, knowing they don't know something.

Point is, I really do appreciate the grace presented in the post. I don't mind if you're being condescending if you forgive me for oversharing.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 39 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

It would be cool if we could keep sexism off lemmy. This isn't reddit.

[–] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 28 points 2 weeks ago

Gender wars stuff is the worst. I would be in favour of it being banned.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] enbipanic@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Neurodivergents be like: "Wait people don't want to know this? That's absurd. So anyway, what I was saying was..."

How many "Men" are just ND?

[–] Soulg@ani.social 32 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

That's always been my issue with this whole mansplaining shit. Like yeah, it is a real thing that exists, but it very quickly just morphed into "a man (whom I didn't want to talk to me) told me something" most of the time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 32 points 2 weeks ago (51 children)

"Mansplaining" is sexist. It's the equivalent of saying women are airheads, or gossips, or talk too much.

Is each man expected to just... Assume that everyone else shares their exact knowledge? Would such an assumption not therefore eliminate most communication entirely?

Or what if we decided to divide up groups by something other than gender. Would it be okay to say "asiansplaining" or "jewsplaining" or "gaysplaoning"?

Can a trans-man mansplaining? Can a trans-woman mansplain? Is there a separate category of "transplaining"?

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You're right. The behavior really should be called "non-consensual info-dumping". Furthermore, people should ask first and only proceed to 'splain away if emphatic consent is given.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (50 replies)
[–] underscores@lemmy.zip 25 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I too hate [opposite gender of reader]

I hate them very much and would not like them on my bed or in my home or in my arms

I hate [opposite gender] and their tendency to be constantly on my mind

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] peregrin5@piefed.social 22 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

how she explains it is literally how i feel. i always worry someone might be thinking I'm mansplaining when really I'm just nerding out and want to talk about interesting info with a friend

i generally assume good intentions and i hope others give me the same courtesy, even if it has sometimes burned me in the past.

load more comments
view more: next ›