this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
534 points (97.7% liked)

memes

16263 readers
2814 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 27 points 6 days ago

Who says you can't hear tone in text?

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago

In what was almost certainly a precedented move, Brian was wrong.

And so is my spell-checker.

[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

whoever runs their social media types pure fire.

[–] xeekei@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm more of a Wictionary guy, myself.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 9 points 6 days ago

Is that a dictionary for witches? Or did you misspell wiktionary?

[–] purrtastic@lemmy.nz 168 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I am whelmed by this exchange

[–] klugerama@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago

I'm frankly plussed.

[–] Skanky@lemmy.world 70 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] match@pawb.social 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This whole exchange is tressing.

[–] diemartin@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 6 days ago

This is so turbing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (2 children)

whelm /wĕlm, hwĕlm/
transitive verb

  1. To cover with water; submerge.
  2. To overwhelm.
[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 6 days ago

Technically correct (still the best kind of correct). However, the meaning has changed a but due to the word's falling into disuse. Colloquially, it is now used as a mid-point between overwhelmed and underwhelmed, describing a situation as a mundane experience. Not disappointing, too stimulating, or even satisfying; just neutral ("Tell my wife I said 'Hello'").

[–] XM34@feddit.org 92 points 1 week ago (1 children)

OP wants to let you know that this exchange made them wet ☝️🤓

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago

Everything reminds me of her.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HowAbt2day 53 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Brian represents that group of people that just say, “No it’s not!”, with authority. I forgot what they call themselves.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I'm too dumb to get this one...why is this funny?

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 139 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Merriam-Webster is literally the dictionary, and Brian is trying to correct them on what is and is not a word.

[–] waz@feddit.uk 1 points 5 days ago

Although it is an American dictionary, so it’s only going to be correct some of the time.

[–] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago

Alternatively, he's saying that these are not in fact unprecedented times.

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yes that part I get, but I don't get the reply from the Merriam Webster account and why that is funny

[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 112 points 1 week ago (17 children)

Because they’re being like “bro please, come on“

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Their response is "Brian....". Like "let me hold your hand whole I say this"

It looks weird because they tagged him first

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Ah, that was a tag. I'm too unfamiliar with Twitter lol.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MissJinx@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is he arguing with fhe dictionary?!!wtf

[–] diemartin@sh.itjust.works 16 points 6 days ago (4 children)

My opinion is that once someone invents a word, it exists forever, even if it's later marked as obsolete/archaic.

Conversely, just because the dictionary doesn't have a word, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

[–] MissJinx@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I agree but he is saying the opposite lol

[–] diemartin@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

I know lol

Just reminded me of those that consider the dictionary a holy book, and new words against the Rules of Nature™

[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 days ago

Many words are forgotten, so I disagree with that they exist forever.

[–] dzsimbo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Yeah, I can say all manner of things like bork and twiddledee, but I don't think I can get marblegargler to stick.

Unless a meme picks it up or is in at least the urban dictionary, it doesn't count.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 4 points 6 days ago

Fiddlesticks. "marblegargler" is perfectly cromulent. ;)

load more comments
view more: next ›