this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
1094 points (97.2% liked)

People Twitter

7525 readers
1128 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived Post

https://archive.ph/vzrga

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah yes, I remember Obama getting impeached for bombing Syria.

And for that matter, Trump getting impeached for killing Soleimani, the leader of Iran, while he was in Iraq.

[–] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago

Soleimani was the commander of the Quds Force, a division of the Iranian military and high-ranking official but he wasn't the leader of Iran.

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

impeachment shmimshmeashment, i want a conviction and an escort out of the building

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

i hate the fucking united states

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nthavoc@lemmy.today 8 points 1 week ago

They had a better chance of impeaching him for Jan 6th for actual insurrection than they do this time. Why? Because there are so many legal loop holes with the War Time Powers Act and the 2001 Authorization of The Use of Military Force. These loopholes were used by both Bush Jr. and Obama for various justifications for air strikes so the precedent is already there. Don't get your hopes up and chalk up it up political theater. It's also a distraction from what's going on. Thanks again to Twatter being that megaphone of "HEY LOOK OVER HERE!"

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 8 points 1 week ago (5 children)

not with the house in the hands of republicans.

Best hope there is enough democracy left in the US to swing it back to the Dems in 2026.

And even then, without a comfortable majority for the Dems in the senate it will just be another impeachment to add to the pile, no conviction.

They don't call him teflon don for no reason

[–] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

Dont get your hopes up. The democrats have yet to show any ability to regain seats. they'll likely just swing harder towards Cheney and get rocked again.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Not sure who still isn't getting this.

There is a literal American traitor in the Oval Office. One who has flagrantly violated the law, and specifically the Constitution, numerous times.

Impeachment is meaningless, as we've witnessed multiple times in American history. Impeachment is an acceptable process if the violation is minimal and not repeated. It's a slap on the wrist. A warning.

We are WAY beyond a symbolic slap on the wrist with no real repercussions. Impeachment is not a valid tool to use in a situation like this. At minimum, we are at the point where there needs to be massive protests like we just saw, repeatedly, until he is removed from office. If that fails, then there needs to be a general strike until he's removed. If that fails, then he needs to be removed from office by force.

If we can't manage these things, we will continue seeing the degradation of our freedoms, the collapse of our economy, the destruction of our founding document, signaling the end of our democracy, and the hole we'll end up finding ourselves in will be one we won't see this country come out of for the remainder of our lives.

It is time to remove this traitor and his treasonous enablers from their positions of power.

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

We haven't declared war since WW2. Everything has been AUMF, which can be done within 60 days retroactively. As always, the government is checks and balances, so if Congress refuses to exercise its powers and let the executive do whatever, it's a moot point.

I think it'd only lead to impeachment if Congress wants us gone within 60 days and Trump refuses, continues without an AUMF, and then Congress actually had the balls to push back at that point.

But if someone is more familiar with the legal processes involved here, please do correct me or add to this.

[–] Jhuskindle@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Can anyone explain what happened to the articles of impeachment that were introduced a few months ago?

[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

So? Nothing will ever come with it.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Not happening. Next quotum

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

The problems, the House and Senate are controlled by the Russian supporting MAGA clowns. I believe Mango Mussolini has a 60 day window before he needs to end the military engagement against Iran. For the moment, a drunk, a felon and Signal App are controlling the US military.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So is everything else he's done. Not seeing it happen any time soon.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trump gave himself a little war, as a treat

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›