this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
533 points (90.8% liked)

Selfhosted

48689 readers
2181 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I tried testing a movie from my home server in plex through firefox and repeatedly got this message, even after reloading.

I knew that they had paywalled the apps on mobile and streaming from outside the network but now they have also blocked watching your own movies through your own hardware.

I do get the point that making software should be able to sustain people but I dont see the move of plex as a fair thing to do. Yes, they have made great software but taking your home server hostage feels like the wrong move.

Even a pop up that says "we need you to donate please" would have been fine. make it pop up before every movie, play donation ads before any movie but straight up disabling the app is kinda cruel.

Anyway, i have switched to jellyfin and it is insanely good. please give it a try. you can run it alongside plex with not issues (at least i had none) and compare the two.

In any case, good luck. Let me know if you need help.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kirk@startrek.website 156 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

Jellyfin is great, but in defense of Plex, they announced that remote streaming would require one of the two parties to have a Plex pass was coming back in March so I don't know if it's fair to say they are holding anything hostage.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 66 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

I started down the Jellyfin path after they made that announcement. It's super easy to install, and in many ways the UI is nicer than Plex. But I ran into challenges getting my server safely accessible for users outside my LAN. And I haven't had the time to look into that further.

Would be great if there was a clean, easy way to set up the webserver portion so it's as easy to share content entirely as Plex. But I get they are a volunteer project with a lot on their plate.

[–] easydnesto@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

I have had great success with tailscale in this regard.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 20 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

The same tailscale that announced last week that they are going to start charging?

https://tailscale.com/kb/1251/pricing-faq

[–] Bubs@lemm.ee 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Took a quick look at the free tier,

  • 3 users
  • 100 devices
  • Basically all tailscale features

That seems pretty reasonable to me. Main account and two accounts to share. With just friends and family, I doubt most people will reach the 100 device limit.

[–] morriscox@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Creating a tailnet using a custom domain is considered for business use.

Well, that sucks for me. I was planning on using my domain name.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If they’re calling it remote streaming when you’re on the same (local) network, that’s not exactly intuitive. I’d say OP’s phrasing was fair.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 33 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

OP has a misconfigured server and isn't connecting to their server over LAN.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 96 points 2 weeks ago (13 children)

Every non-Free Software will betray you eventually. It's only a matter of time.

[–] FarmTaco@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 50 points 2 weeks ago (49 children)

In this thread:

  1. An OP that doesn’t understand how their network is working
  2. People rushing to suggest a solution that they fawn over because it’s open source. I have yet to see anyone recommend Emby.
  3. “Tailscale will solve all your problems!” Great - how do I make that work on an LG TV that’s 100 miles away?
[–] tabular@lemmy.world 51 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (21 children)
  1. Open source has high immunity to devs making changes at the expense of the user for their benefit because anti-features can be removed. Recommending another proprietary alternative here would be like saying they aught to leave an abusive partner but then recommend someone with the same red flags.
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

3 - An OpenWRT router with Wireguard connecting to another router 1000 miles away will do the trick.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (47 replies)
[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Remote, yes, they announced you need Plex pass one side or the other for it to work.

Local, no, that shouldn't happen. Your device isn't reaching your Plex server locally.

To work around the remote issue, you can VPN to your local network.

But you're better off in the long haul with Jellyfin as you're doing now.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 38 points 2 weeks ago (32 children)

It's pretty rare that a company starts taking away free features and doesn't end up fucking payers in the end.

The biggest bar to Jellyfin is TV clients, the second biggest is security.

TV clients can be fixed with a one-time purchase of a $20 android TV stick. If viewing your familys ARR content isn't worth $20 you probably don't need to do it anyway.

Security for remote streaming is a harder thing to handle. Most people are capable of port forwarding, But just hanging a smallish public project out there in the open is always a dicey proposition. It honestly needs real fail2ban, probably SSL, 2FA and password complexity requirements.

We could probably make a jellyfin helper container to handle some of this. Walk people through Let's Encrypt, dynDNS, port forwarding tests, add fail2ban with a firewall, maybe even slap suricata in it.

We need to convince the project to add 2FA and password complexity requirements.

I don't know guys what do you think is it crazy? does it make sense? Would anybody actually use it?

[–] rollerbang@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I access my stuff via VPN. As for sharing with others, I simply don't do that. VPN is still an option though. Or temporary client whitelisting, etc.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)
[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 38 points 2 weeks ago (40 children)

Old news, but time for Jellyfin. I made the switch a couple months ago. Some minor teething issues, but better, IMO, especially now as my family all have LDAP users and that just works.

load more comments (40 replies)
[–] psychadlligoat@piefed.social 37 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Someone else already said it and you've already swapped but I'll say it in detail:

when setting the server connection up you selected "ServerName (long string of numbers)" and not "ServerName (your IP - SECURE)"

this routes your connection through the Plex servers and makes it not a local connection anymore. this is extremely easy to do and forget you've done because it barely impacts performance

[–] grue@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

In other words, it's a dark pattern that tricks users into letting Plex MITM their connection.

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It gets around port forwarding/firewall issues that most people don't know how to deal with. But putting it behind a paywall kinda kills any chance of it being a benevolent feature.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UxyIVrljPeRl@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Welp, i killed mine yesterday as it wouldnt let me stream while offline. Modem died so no Internet for me. Why do i have everything local if it dosent work while offline...

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 19 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Exactly. Thats why i use jellyfin now. Try installing it alongside. For me it worked well.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Plex has pay walled FREE servers streaming to FREE clients only.

If you have a plex watch pass (for client) you're good and can stream from any server. If you have a plex pass (for server) any one can stream from your server. But you have to have one or the other.

[–] MSids@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

For software I like made by people getting paid, I was happy to pay the one time fee. It's really good, secure, and downloads are fast now.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ISolox@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Why anyone still uses Plex for new setups is beyond me.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml 30 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

What about switching to Jellyfin?

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 16 points 2 weeks ago

Already done. Thanks for the suggestion though. :)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Plex has paywalled my server!

Skill issue tbh.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tkw8@lemm.ee 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (12 children)

I've never been a Plex user. Always been with Jellyfin. I've heard that plexamp is a killer app but finamp has always been sufficient for my pretty basic needs. But I have a question for you (meant in good faith). You say,

I do get the point that making software should be able to sustain people but I dont see the move of plex as a fair thing to do. Yes, they have made great software but taking your home server hostage feels like the wrong move.

If Plex needs a sustainable business model, asking for donations isn't enough. So what is the move for them? What do they do to both fulfill their need for a sustainable business and also not upset their userbase? (I'm not defending Plex or this move of taking your server hostage, in any way.)

I'm genuinely curious how, with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight, they should have played this or at a minimum, made better moves than they did.

Very glad you're with jellyfin btw. You can check out some cool plugins at awesome-jellyfin.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Donations isn’t going to cover the hunger of a 40 million dollar VC round. Those investors want more than a return, they want plex profitable ASAP

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Investors are like parasitic leeches to any business model. As soon as you add them, the business has to grow in order to satisfy the leeches who provide no benefit to the model other than to be attached to it. If you ignore the leech, they'll drain all your lifeforce, so your only option is to satisfy them and feed them. Unfortunately, they are also ravenous creatures who are never satisfied. If you feed them a little, they'll want more next time in an endless cycle.

Once you are infected by investors ... eventually they will destroy whatever you created.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

So what is the move for them?

Plex has a two-pronged VOD service. They have ad-supported "live television" and they have content to rent.

I don't know if that's enough to sustain them but I don't really care. I've been a PlexPass owner for over ten years. I have only asked that they resolve bugs and made requests for things like proper organization of classical music (which they've explicitly stated they will not consider).

You do bring to light something I hadn't considered; that they see Plex as a business model. From my perspective, I want to buy a fully developed product with the expectation of bug fixes and security patches etc over time. I genuinely can not think of a single thing the developers have added to the service that I've used in the past ten years.

So, what kind of business model charges money to do things that don't have an apparent impact on the user experience?

Plex has been one of my most used applications in the past decade. However, it has its limitations and they are actively imposing more limitations on the experience in favor of "a sustainable business model".

The issue is that their sustainable business model is interrupting the users' sustained use of a platform they've already paid for. I've had to go through all of my devices and disable all auto-updates to ensure I do not get the "New Plex Experience".

What we should be asking is why "selling a product" is no longer a business model.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (20 children)

Are you saying that you’re on your home network with your Plex server and it won’t let you play your media without paying? That’s not true if so. You must be outside the network.

[–] JordanZ@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

My guess is they have VLANs and they didn’t set up the server to treat them as local traffic.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Plex really needs to do a Tailscale style connection to your server. But instead they chose to keep their outdated method of funneling all of their traffic through their servers, and need to charge lots of money in order to pay for it.

[–] rezz@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

Considering both Plex and Tailscale are going toward VC exits, Headscale and Jellyfin is the only FOSS way atm.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Make sure your home server config isn’t mistaking this client as a remote user. Check your networking, etc

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Access via IP address and not the name. I've been having to do it that way for several days now, too.

Edit to add: It's due to a change I made in my OpnSense setup. I restored a ZFS snapshot and it's working again as it should.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›