YYYY-MM-DD if you're doing backup naming, easier to find
this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
555 points (87.0% liked)
memes
15552 readers
3994 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yup, versioned files ALWAYS get a YYYY-MM-DD HHMM timestamp. So when you sort alphabetically, they sort chronologically.
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
My time abroad has taught me that YYYY/MM/DD is the way to format dates.
My time using a computer and trying to have any semblance of organization has taught me the same
my man!
its really the only option if you're using it for things like file storage.
iso8601 aka 2025-06-12
Waiting for the ISO 8601 & 9001 gang to show up and promote YYYY-MM-DD.
Edit: That took seconds, a very punctual bunch.
Hello I've arrived
Whoo! ISO-8601 fan club!
That's ... why I'm here
I’m now imagining a child who must write 2026-05-10T10:06:09.426792Z on all of their tests.
They should also add a timezone since most of us don't live at UTC zero timezones -> 2012-12-28T18:12:33+09:00
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
ISO thirsty!
ISO 8601/RFC-3339 (Unix Epoch also acceptable) gang reporting in.
load more comments
(17 replies)
For consistency, Americans should adopt mm:ss.hh MM-DD-YYYY.
For consistency, Europeans should adopt ss:mm:hh DD-MM-YYYY.
See how ridiculous that is? ISO8601 or GTFO
The european one is sorted based on importance to see. The day is more important than the month which is more important than the year. The hour is more important than the minute which is more important than the second
load more comments
(4 replies)
At least ss:mm:hh and DD-MM-YYYY are internally consistent, even if they aren't consistent with each other.
MM-DD-YYYY isn't even internally consistent.
You monster
Nah they should adopt metric time and nothing else.
ISO 8601 gang.
Represent.
This fucknuts who thinks day should come before year, hah! Give me YYYY-MM-DD, because dashes are better than slashes any day of the week.
This format is the best. Especially for digital file names, because sorting the files by filename also sorts them by date.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(6 replies)
Immediate red flag, we all know that YYYY/MM/DD is the only acceptable perfect date
Actually YYYY-MM-DD is better since it can be used basically everywhere and with / it can't be used in filenames
load more comments
(4 replies)
This is stupid AF.
YYYY/MM/DD
This is the best choice.
/ isn't a valid char in filenames, yyyy-mm-dd is better
load more comments
(1 replies)
Heretic!
YYYY.MM.DD is the correct format.
small correction: YYYY-MM-DD to avoid common special meanings chars
rfc3339 my beloved
Don't go with this psycho! He mixes European style order with US style punctuation.
load more comments
(12 replies)
view more: next ›