this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
78 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13867 readers
866 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

it's fucking banging lenin-pogger

BONUS lenin-dont-laugh

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Krem@hexbear.net 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

smh the inventor of communism didn't travel by wrapping himself in a postal sack and demanding to be shipped by non-priority mail. contradictions

[–] D61@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago

3rd Class, Bulk Business Mail only!

[–] MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net 20 points 2 days ago

Lenin probably never even saw that particular car, never mind rode it it. Although he (along with others) did have use of a similar early Rolls Royce's over the years. It was less about luxury and more about the fact that Rolls Royce has an engineering firm had a global reputation for reliability - especially in extreme weather - compare to other car manufacturers because of their experience making aeroplane engines and components.

If people are interested, the Surrey Vintage Vehicle Society put out a three part article tacing its provenance and clearing up some of the myths on the internet about it. That link starts on Part 3, which is the bit explicitly about that model and the cars Lenin did use, but it's all interesting (if you're a massive transport or history nerd). There's a few minor, smug asides from the author, but the work is good and it contains some amusing details, like finding doucments showing that one car had to be returned to Moscow for repair because someone joyrode it and almost crashed into some cows.

[–] miz@hexbear.net 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

love this gotcha shit. he was supposed to greet heads of state in a horse-driven cart wearing a barrel and suspenders. fuck you Smithsonian

[–] Carl@hexbear.net 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

While this car is often called "Lenin's Rolls-Royce", it should be noted that this was one of four Rolls-Royces maintained by a state-owned special garage for dignitaries and such during the Lenin years. Although Lenin did have a personal Rolls as well, it didn't survive the Revolution - there's no definitive record of what happened to it afaik, but a lot of cars were stolen or cannibalized for parts in those years, so it wouldn't surprise me if that was its fate.

[–] OldSoulHippie@hexbear.net 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Was there a large discrepancy in price with cars back then? It doesn't seem like there was enough difference between cars back in the day. The only thing I can think of is that the assembly line made them more affordable.

Not knowing much about it, I would guess that car culture has a lot to do with how the prices got set and how brands got elevated. It would have to develop over time

[–] Lyudmila@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago

Absolutely correct. The price discrepancy in cars was primarily about the method of manufacture. The Model T was the Tata Nano of its day, clocking in at a miniscule $850 new in the US ($27,800 adjusted for inflation). This Rolls Royce would have been a shocking, exorbitant... $1200 in Europe ($39,000 adjusted).

Given the reliability difference especially in extreme weather conditions and the fact that the model T was built on an entirely different continent, this honestly isn't the own the Smithsonian is trying to make it out to be.

the ford model t had a 2.9 liter engine, the Rolls Royce silver ghost had a 7.5 liter engine

the chadmobile

[–] gingerbrat@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago

I just misread the spoiler and left out the "against" i-cant

[–] D61@hexbear.net 7 points 2 days ago

Half-track, full Chad.

[–] GoodGuyWithACat@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago
     🎩

🚬 lenin-pogger

     🚗

Lenin the driving crooner

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago

Holy shit that fucking rules