this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
277 points (96.6% liked)

Fuck AI

2889 readers
635 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The MAHA report got me thinking. We need a concise slur for people who blindly copy and paste LLM outputs. It needs to say that the person is lazy, ignorant, gullible, disrespectful, and dishonest all at once. Something along the lines of NPC. Maybe parrot? But that’s not too catchy. Any ideas?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wulrus@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Clippy (the old Office assistant)

[–] Gustephan@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

Be better than using slurs.

[–] lemonSqueezy@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

LLMBro, ... All Profit

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 2 points 14 hours ago

Delusion maxers.

[–] wulrus@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Chatbot Shill

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago
[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago

Stupid is pretty accurate.

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Asked ChatGPT. It gave me a couple of good ones:

  • Bothead
  • Promptpuppet
  • Promptparrot
  • Neuroshill
[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

damn I really like neuroshill but realistically bothead is a lot easier to say.

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I like it also, bothead was interesting also but comparing it with metalhead would imply the meaning bot enthusiast.

I used my own brain now and came up with promptsimp

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

🤣 did you blindly follow it, promptpuppet?

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago

'olafurp' it is 🤗

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spicehoarder@lemm.ee 1 points 18 hours ago
[–] NRay7882@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I could support "lemmings" for sure. They follow one another to their manufactured death, just like those rodents in the movie that someone swept off a cliff.

[–] ElectroLisa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 182 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago

That's good, because they serve up sloppy seconds.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] ProfessorProteus@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Combining yours with the one by @vala@lemmy.world, we get "Slop gobbler"

[–] Sarcasmo220@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Slop gobbler

I propose combining the two to make "Slopper."

Edit: Another comment below made the same suggestion first.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] prude@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

mouthbreathers

[–] Poayjay@lemmy.world 114 points 2 days ago (11 children)

We need another one for people who think posting, “I asked chatGPT and this is what it said…” is in anyway contributing to anything.

[–] 3dmvr@lemm.ee 1 points 14 hours ago

Evertime I tell them that I also have access to chatgpt and if I wanted to ask it I would, I only asked real ppl for answers from real ppl, if you need to ai or even use google, I'm good, I can do that on my own.

[–] BertramDitore@lemm.ee 57 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I stopped listening to a daily news podcast partly because the hosts did this live on the air. They’d ask ChatGPT for a statistic, then say “ChatGPT says it’s 37% of Americans” or whatever. They never fact-checked it, and based on how consistently wrong LLMs have been in my experience, it called into question everything else they said.

It’s a great way to instantly lose trust in another person’s abilities.

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 1 points 29 minutes ago

67% of statistics are made up on the spot.

[–] glaber@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That might be one of the most unhinged used of ChatGPT I've seen yet. There's virtually no linguistic difference between saying one number or another, all possible answers are gonna look identical to the machine. I'd like to see these slopgobblers try to ask the same question several times and see the results

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah it's basically asking "give me a statistic that feeds the current Internet vibe on the topic"

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In school, plagiarists are called cheaters. This seems the same to me.

[–] ChexMax@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

But they're worse than cheaters. They're cheating off of hallucinations. It's like you're cheating off of spark notes for the movie instead of the book, totally unaware that they made a bunch of changes. They're stupid cheaters.

[–] vala@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Prompt gobbler

[–] DriftingLynx@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago
[–] ShaolinRaiden@lemm.ee 60 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] unabart@sh.itjust.works 1 points 23 hours ago

Gruntsuckers

[–] HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org 41 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I think I've heard "Prompt fondler"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ZDL@ttrpg.network 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But ... "moron" is already right over there.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 hours ago

Yeah but being nitpicky about what specific kind of moron is what makes us human.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Coworker regularly sends me llm slop when i ask him a question. He has a PhD in relevant field. Its so ridiculous. I end up answering the question myself but realizing thats just freeing him from the work so just going to start replying that’s unacceptable

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Respond with "Chatgpt, write me a reply thanking my coworker for the answer"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The premise of this post is almost impressively stupid. You're trying to make "fetch" happen without even bothering to come up with "fetch" first, while asking the people it's supposed to catch on with to come up with it for you.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 8 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Is that not democracy manifest?

[–] ReginaPhalange@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

A succulent chinese meal?

load more comments
view more: next ›