this post was submitted on 16 May 2025
725 points (98.1% liked)

Work Reform

12014 readers
1840 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 hour ago

As an environmental regulator in America I know first hand how company owners tend to respect nothing but their own wealth and standing. I write and enforce administrative orders and penalties to company presidents and CEOs. They'll throw the world under the bus before taking reaponsibility.

But during covid a lot of contracts and orders were digitally signed and not given wet signatures.

So a lot of American company owners are trying to pull back on everything covid. One of the angles is attempting to void all contracts not physically signed with a wet signature. Completely ignoring digital signing is a (new?) tactic being used.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Love how there is clearly a last line cropped out.

:: eye twitches::

[–] ShortFuse@lemmy.world 3 points 39 minutes ago* (last edited 38 minutes ago)

"If the answer is yes, you should be incredibly proud of yourself." (My guess)

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 20 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

7 months ago I started a 6 month remote contract for chime.com.

At around 5 months, I asked my manager if she was going to extend me. She said no. Cool, whatever. Life of a contractor.

The product and engineer team rallied against ending my contract and my manager caved and extended my contract for another 6 months.

So a week into my new contract, they asked me to come into the office in San Francisco.

This is a difficult ask from me because I had to find a person to watch my son and my dogs. Drove my son an hour away to my sisters and paid a dog sitter 80/day to watch my dogs.

I land in San Francisco and my boss text me saying she has something important to tell me. I get into the office and a few hours later she cancels my contract because they want to have the person in my role local and to come into the SF office 4 days a week. This new position is also only paying 135k vs my 165k.

[–] kamen@lemmy.world 12 points 2 hours ago

The irony of yet another fintech that enables you to do everything from your phone and yet wants the staff in the office. Screw them. You'll find something better (if you haven't already).

[–] dancingdots@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

That's deplorable! Did your contract have any early termination penalties?

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

No, not at all. I don't understand why we even have contracts written if anyone can breach it at will.

[–] racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 hours ago

Well, fuck them. Your product team and stuff sounds decent though. When they failed to find a local and asks you to come back, remember to demand a 10% raise.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

If they signed the offer, is that not a contract? Do they not have a pretty clear breach of contract case here?

[–] hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Right to work baby! At-will employment means "You can leave any time you want, but we can fire you any time we want."

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 hours ago

Yeah, I guess I forgot where I lived for a moment and took for granted my union contract.

[–] blinx615@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

They could have waited longer. That would have been worse.

[–] Jollyllama@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Never quit your job over an offer, I always run my time out at my old job.

Last job switch was last day on Friday, new day of first job on Monday.

[–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 hours ago

Ah, a fellow wage slave.

[–] Ebber@lemmings.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

What do you mean "running your time out"? I'm having difficulties understanding how that isn't quitting your job

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

i think they mean - unless you have signed a proper contract (not just an offer) and there are now consequences for the employer if they let you go for no reason, then you should still stick to your old job

[–] racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think that's the majority of the companies work. You sign an offer, quit your old job on Friday (at the end of the notice), and sign the new contract the next Monday.

[–] Ebber@lemmings.world 8 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

So this is some bullshit going on in America? Where I live the contract is signed ahead of time with a specific start date, so this signing an offer (which sounds like nothing more than a pinky promise) and then a contract on the first day is new knowledge to me.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 2 points 3 hours ago

In the modern environment I can't help but wonder, since I don't know who this guy is, is he a citizen of the United States. Because PayPal might be towing the Trump party line for all I know. It wouldn't surprise me one bit.

[–] SeboBear@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 7 hours ago

Shocking to hear as I am Used to have binding consequences for such action in my country - feel u !

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world -2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

this is why i simply refuse to work for anyone else. period.

i quit society in 2016 and have never looked back.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

i quit society

you are lucky that your deserted island has an internet connection 😂

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world -1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

who says you have to live in complete isolation to stop participating? i just do what i want to do, when i want to do it.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

who says you have to live in complete isolation to stop participating?

dictionary and common sense.

you have an internet connection. you are paying for it, or someone else on your behalf. you are eating food and probably paying for it too. you have not quit a society.

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world -1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

ok. i quit being a slave. how's that?

[–] Senal@programming.dev 2 points 39 minutes ago (1 children)

Lacks specificity, but the general sentiment is understood

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world -1 points 36 minutes ago (1 children)

it was understood in my first comment. you just wanted to put on your poindexter pants.

[–] Senal@programming.dev 1 points 8 minutes ago

i wasn't the person who replied to your first post.

The sentiment might have been somewhat clear, but the language indicated a misunderstanding of how much reliance there is upon society, which is what was called out (again, not by me).

You asked a question, i answered with my opinion also i look fabulous in my pointdexter pants, i even have the matching pocket protector.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 11 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

never ever assume you got the offer until both parties have signed a contract

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

That's what I thought "signing the offer" meant?

Contracts can be written on napkins and still be valid... If both parties agreed to the terms, and they signed it, I feel like that's a contract even if the company doesn't want to call it that.

But I'm not a lawyer

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

i think "offer" is the keyword here. they specifically didn't say "job contract", they just signed an "offer" of some kind, whatever that is. A job contract is a legal document that has a specific definition of what it entails, an "offer" is just an offer

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 hours ago

Yeah probably... Scummy as fuck, but not one bit surprising

[–] kahdbrixk@feddit.org 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

What is the meaning of "signing an offer" then? Is this not a binding contract?

Just curious. Not American. Don't know if this has anything to do with the US.

Edit: or was this a situation where only OP signed an offer and then quit the old job before having the signature of the other party? Would be very unusual, I normally get contracts pre signed by my new employer that only I need to sign

[–] Joostringoot@feddit.nl 16 points 10 hours ago

That's why we need a democratic economy. Distribute the power over the means of production.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 38 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

That's the whole point of having a contract. You don't quit your old job until you have a signed new contract for the new one. I understand that many Americans don't believe in this basic concept, but it's common in many countries around the world.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 8 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Even a contract includes probation period where they can let you go without reason and short notice. Even in a quite worker-friendly country like Germany it is usually 6 month period with 2 weeks notice (both sides).

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 7 points 5 hours ago

Absolutely true, but in this case they seem to be trying to wiggle out of even that minimal notice period. A promissory estoppel case would probably, if the plaintiff won, see damages in the form of payment equal to the salary that would have been earned in that minimum notice period.

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

Unfortunately many employment agreements in the US are "at will" meaning either party can terminate it immediately at will. In states where this is legal (almost all of them), you'd be hard-pressed to find any company willing to do it any other way.

[–] cyberblob@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 8 hours ago

That must be the Land of the free. :D

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 11 points 10 hours ago

Right? What is this "Employment Contract" you speak of? I just got told "You start this day, good luck fucker."

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›