this post was submitted on 16 May 2025
740 points (98.2% liked)

Work Reform

12014 readers
1750 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

never ever assume you got the offer until both parties have signed a contract

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

That's what I thought "signing the offer" meant?

Contracts can be written on napkins and still be valid... If both parties agreed to the terms, and they signed it, I feel like that's a contract even if the company doesn't want to call it that.

But I'm not a lawyer

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

i think "offer" is the keyword here. they specifically didn't say "job contract", they just signed an "offer" of some kind, whatever that is. A job contract is a legal document that has a specific definition of what it entails, an "offer" is just an offer

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 hours ago

Yeah probably... Scummy as fuck, but not one bit surprising

[–] kahdbrixk@feddit.org 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

What is the meaning of "signing an offer" then? Is this not a binding contract?

Just curious. Not American. Don't know if this has anything to do with the US.

Edit: or was this a situation where only OP signed an offer and then quit the old job before having the signature of the other party? Would be very unusual, I normally get contracts pre signed by my new employer that only I need to sign