this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
63 points (90.9% liked)

Linux

56359 readers
823 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] finalaccountforreal@lemm.ee 58 points 2 months ago

First I hear about them, and since Brave is the default browser I know I don't want to know more. Smooth!

[–] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 51 points 2 months ago
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] data1701d@startrek.website 8 points 2 months ago

Stares in Debian Testing/Sid.

[–] vikingtons@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

well, at least they provided some rationale for switching browsers. still, it's good thing we have bazzite.

[–] Matty_r@programming.dev 21 points 2 months ago

Damn, not sure I'm a fan of any of this. I left Arch because I didn't want to be on Rolling release any more, and really liked what Nobara was offering for the out of the box experience.

Brave is super sketchy, and not sure about putting in yet another thing to handle updates (replacing plasma-discover and gnome-software).

I'm wondering if its worth forking it to remove some of these changes.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

At least they disable the monetization features of Brave but making stupid Google Meet such a hard requirement to compromise of all ethics? WTF?

[–] tooLikeTheNope@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 months ago

Brave? Yeah...nope

[–] Vitaly@feddit.uk 17 points 2 months ago

Don't know about brave, but rolling release is much better

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 11 points 1 month ago

The rolling release thing isn't for me, but I get why that model might appeal. Brave, though? Why?

[–] stormio@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Does the rolling release model mean Nobara is based on Fedora Rawhide now?

Edit: I found the answer from the developer on Reddit.

the VERSION updates are rolling. (N41->N42->N43+)

nothing is changing in the update process. we still do a monthly snapshot of fedora and provide that to users. we are -not- using rawhide.

the "rolling" simply means when its time to go 42->43 you'll receive those updates as standard package updates without needing to do any specific commands/changes.

[–] qweertz@programming.dev 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The partial unannounced update broke my installation, which is why I finally ditched Nobara for Bluefin

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 3 points 2 months ago

I'll definitely uninstall brave but it makes sense why they chose it. People crying over it are being dumb. Hopefully when Firefox fixes its crashing issue it can go back to the default.

[–] Kristof12@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 month ago

Rolling release? Not expecting this lol noice with brave by default