this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
400 points (99.0% liked)

ADHD memes

10087 readers
1425 users here now

ADHD Memes

The lighter side of ADHD


Rules

  1. No Party Pooping

Other ND communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Some people say they are addictive, but to me shorts are an absolute nightmare, I despise them, I hate them, I'm allergic to them.

The ultra quick cutting, the often chopped style, the accelerated voice talking at you without pause or mercy even at 1.0, the subtitles in the center that I cannot disable. It's an attack on my senses, pure overstimulation.

My wife sends me couple of shorts each day and sometimes it's even interesting content-wise, but I absolutely hate this horrible format, procrastinate watching them and wish back a world where this form of media did not exist. It all started even before shorts in the way people did videos, and somehow it spiraled into this kind of hell scape.

Anyone else feeling like this?

EDIT: thanks everyone, now I feel validated, thought maybe I'm the odd one with so strong negative feelings about them! And sorry about the confusion about pants and stocks (that provoked some funny answers though so no regrets). Yes - as you have all figured out, I'm talking about the annoying short videos almost everyone seems to be addicted to.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Shorts or longs...I hate the click-baity ones.

[–] zerofk@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I detest them. Some science YouTubers have begun using them too, and too often they’re either just cut from longer videos I’ve already seen - and hence wasting my time until I realise that - or they contain no explanation at all because of the length.

[–] zenforyen@feddit.org 1 points 35 minutes ago

Yeah in the best case it's just a promotional teaser. Obviously you cannot explain anything non trivial in that amount of time.

[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ZeffSyde@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Don't have a cow, man

[–] a_postmodern_hat@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I keep turning them off in YouTube but that doesn’t stop them coming back. Good to know I’m paying for a hostile product. I won’t forget it.

[–] aeshna_cyanea@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

You can use a patched YouTube client that removes ads and shorts. A few minutes worth of work to set up but worth it imo

https://github.com/KobeW50/ReVanced-Documentation/blob/main/YT-ReVanced-Guide.md

[–] Soapbox1858@lemm.ee 16 points 14 hours ago

I too absolutely despise the whole format.

[–] KAtieTot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

"Shorts" / "TikToks" / w/e are just short form multimedia content taken to their logical extreme. Small tidbits of context free, useless information, slammed into your soul so fast you miss all of the important bits and just get the buzz.

[–] zenforyen@feddit.org 3 points 15 hours ago

Yeah, useless time sink with lots of flashy distraction. The people who envisioned and built the internet surely did not anticipate it will evolve into THIS.

[–] LunarLoony@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

I especially can't stand it when either of these two things happen:

  1. The subtitles show one word at a time (???)
  2. The subtitles are animated
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ChillCapybara@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Man I was sure this was about shorts vs pants too. Pants all day every day. Is that another adhd thing now?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 14 hours ago

No, shorts are awesome.

Especially booty shorts.

[–] CCAirWater@lemm.ee 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I thought it was about the stock market. And I haven't the faintest of clue what a short is, except that it's used in films about the stock market lol

[–] bisby@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

I know you didn't ask but an opportunity to info dump is always fun.

Shorting is basically borrowing stock from someone, selling it. and then buying it back later before the person wants their stock back. Since (mostly) all shares are equal, as long as I return to the same stock, there's no reason to hold onto a specific share.

If a stock is going down, if I borrow a share for a week, sell it for $100, then in 6 days buy it for $50 and return it to you, then I've just made $50.

It's a way to make money when the stock market is going down, but is often riskier because with buying stock, you can just hold indefinitely. If I buy a $100 share, and the price goes to $0. I just lost $100. The most I can possibly lose is $100. (edit: and I sell at any point in the future when I decide. Could be 1 week, could be 30 years.)

But when shorting, you have to return the shares to the actual owner at some point, and since you sold the shares, you MUST get them back. But if I sold your $100 share, and in 6 days it is now $10,000 (this wouldn't happen, but for example), and I don't have $10,000, now I can't return your share to you, and I'm in REAL big trouble. The amount of money I can lose is technically infinite, and since I don't have infinite money to lose, it probably just devolves into legal issues.

[–] CCAirWater@lemm.ee 1 points 14 hours ago

Oh I love an info dump. Thank you for taking the time to explain it. It sounds like a twisted way to fuck yourself over financially or hit it real big.

... I'd rather take my chances at a craps table, sheesh!

Thanks again!

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

So I essentially bet that the market crashes and thus make bank on it?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CetaceanNeeded@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

I don't mind some of them but the obnoxious subtitles, they just put me off so much and the video controls that are just always there getting in the way.

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Do none of you remember vines??

[–] LoamImprovement@beehaw.org 1 points 5 hours ago

I mean, it was a little after my time but Vine never got abused by rage bait/content churn and fine tuned by the platform specifically to hijack your attention span and feed you ads.

[–] Finalsolo963@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 19 hours ago
[–] orgrinrt@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I thought you meant the short pants. I love them. I’m so sweaty all the time and long pants feel uncomfortable on my legs even if loose. Only wear them when necessary. Shorts are a godsend.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] zenforyen@feddit.org 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Ah so that is where this reference is from! I'm too uneducated / young, only played the GBA Generation games

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 14 hours ago

You could've seen it if you played Fire Red/Leaf Green ;)

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I despise them because they're shallow as fuck, "content" that requires zero brain to enjoy (I do enjoy some of that shit on occasion, but not in the form of short videos, I prefer the lazy approach of putting something on and not having to move a finger for 10+ minutes).
Another thing that makes me hate that kind of video is that it's a breeding ground for "reacts", as if the longer form of that wasn't already a piece of shit. Neither of these problems are exclusive to YT, they're just following on Tiktok, like Instagram did

[–] zenforyen@feddit.org 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Reaction videos are the worst, in any form. I'm waiting for the day until there's a reaction video loop referring to nothing than other reacts in circle and nobody knows what the actual underlying video was. The recursive reaction from hell.

[–] blindsight@beehaw.org 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The only type of "reaction" content I like is experts validating or refuting non-experts' videos in their area of expertise. I think they add a lot of value to these platforms by promoting critical thinking and the value of experts.

Then again, I hate shorts, so I rarely see even those. So maybe I'm off base.

[–] zenforyen@feddit.org 1 points 33 minutes ago

Yeah agreed, but that presupposes that the person watching can distinguish someone just babbling and someone who actually is someone qualified to comment on some topic. And I guess the latter kind is a drop in the ocean, because expertise is a limited resource but opinions and bullshit are cheap.

Yep. Absolutely despise shorts. For all the reasons you say, on top of the fact that 98% of them are bullshit and wrong.

Which is bizarre, because I get sucked into facebook reels once in a while. I blame the cat clips.

(I always browse with the volume muted. I despise shitty sound effects like the fake laughter, shitty music, or the AI voice.)

[–] oppy1984@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I basically only watch YouTube on my TV via Roku, I hate shorts and wish there was a way to block them on the Roku app.

If google really wants to push shorts then make it a separate app. If someone is watching on a TV then chances are they aren't looking for short form content, so stop pushing it on that medium.

[–] ZeffSyde@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

They had one years ago called Vine.

I remember that being an ok way spend a smoke break, I couldn't imagine living on it the way people use shorts/Tik Tok. The algorithm must be way more intense now.

[–] oppy1984@lemm.ee 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I get what you're saying but Vine was an independent company that got bought by Twitter then killed.

I was thinking that Google should make their own app called YouTube shorts and take on tiktok that way. Google/YouTube is trying to have an all in one app, the problem is that muddies the waters and when you stand for everything you stand for nothing. Not to mention that YouTube spent years promoting longer for content and that's what the user base thinks of now when you say YouTube.

You can play off the YouTube brand with a separate app and still get the branding boost. But actively muddying the waters and annoying your user base is just.... well I would say bad business.... but given their track record, it's pretty on brand for a Google property.

[–] ZeffSyde@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Ah, I'd forgotten that Vine was independent at first. Thanks for the correction.

[–] oppy1984@lemm.ee 1 points 11 hours ago

It happens, I wouldn't even want to count how many times I've mixed up my facts in the last year. I have no idea why, since I never used Vine, but it's history is a useless factiod that is forever stuck in my head.

[–] LunarLoony@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 19 hours ago

Instagram'd algorithm, at least, will prioritise reels over everything else - leading a lot of accounts to post still images as "reels"

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

Yes, I also strongly dislike the very short video format you can find on multiple social media platforms these days. On the occasion when my friends forward me things, I find it somewhat manageable if the sound is off. Most of those videos have subtitles and if they're silent they feel less obnoxious.

[–] myplacedk@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hate them so much for all the reasons you mention and a few more.

But there are times that I prefer them over a 2-3 minute vidoe padded to 12-15 minutes for monetization.

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I honestly prefer text over either of those options. Saves time and doesn't over stimulate. Plus, if I lose focus I can just go back, which would be tedious in a video.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 7 points 1 day ago

More importantly, you can search text to get straight to the point you need. Doing that in video or audio is not possible, you have to memorize timestamps

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Shorts are cancer and vertical videos need to die.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›