this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
570 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

69867 readers
3017 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 hour ago

Remember:

There's no such thing as a perpetual license, there's only "until we change our mind" licenses

[–] MetalMachine@feddit.nl 12 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The not owning anything is ridiculous. We need clear regulation that makes it so companies cant do bullcrap like this. If I buy something, I own it, period.

[–] Disaster@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

At this point, why would anyone do business with broadcom at all?

[–] frezik@midwest.social 6 points 2 hours ago

Because they make all the cheap ethernet chips that go on motherboards.

Other than that, can't think of a good reason.

[–] nobleshift@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago

NUTANIX AHV BITCHES! Download The Nutanix Bible and start learning it.

[–] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

This is why KVM is a good option, or even Hyper-V for Windows hosts. The only problem with KVM Is graphical support for paravirtualized drivers is basic at best with no full 3D acceleration that I know of for Windows guests; virtio-win isn't exactly the best option graphically and QXL to my knowledge is even more lacking, but one can just pass a hardware GPU through over vfio-pci for that.

Unfortunately for Mac hosts, Apple has no KVM/Hyper-V equivalent so your best option for virtualization there is Parallels.

(and it's honestly kinda stupid that Apple can't build their own KVM equivalent into the Darwin kernel which macOS is based on)

[–] rpa@europe.pub 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

There is a KVM equivalent on MacOS, Apple's Hypervisor virtualization framework.

KVM is just the kernel side, you need QEMU (for example) on userland. On MacOS you have now UTM.

[–] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 1 points 3 hours ago

I didn't even know that was a thing. Cool!

[–] NGC2346@sh.itjust.works 17 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Proxmox is the way to go in businesses right now to replace Vmware

[–] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 58 minutes ago

Our move to XCP-ng Hypervisors with XOA has been a great experience.

[–] one_knight_scripting@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I would argue for Apache Cloudstack personally.

Though I have used and like Proxmox as well.

[–] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

And virt-manager is pretty solid for hobbyist tinkering too.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 hours ago

Yeah I'd second that. It's good for discovering valid settings as you get start, and then once you want to do more complicated stuff, the XML option view becomes useful, and then if you want to try on CLI after all you can start using virsh to administer the same VMs.

At least that's how I progressed through the stages as I started messing with a Windows VM for a game that doesn't lend itself to hosting on Linux natively.

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 280 points 1 day ago (13 children)

Threatening to sue your customers is such a brilliant business move.

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 124 points 1 day ago (7 children)

It's also the business model of Oracle I think and they are wildly successful.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Jestzer@lemmy.world 115 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (29 children)

This is another good reminder to not use VMware nor VirtualBox for any reason.

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 140 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Where would we be without predatory rent-seeking?

Someone's going to make a fortune migrating firms off VMWare onto open-source VMs.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 65 points 1 day ago (15 children)

Man could you imagine what proxmox would be if that project got just a tenth of the money VMware got?

Classic prisoners dilemma. Nobody wants to invest in proxmox because not enough people invest in proxmox.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 57 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Honestly I think if Proxmox got VMWare money then they’d become stuffed to the gills with business sharks and probably go the same route eventually.

That is not a Proxmox problem, that is a capitalism problem.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 89 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Broadcom is where previously good softwares go to die.

Proxmox, Nutanix, Canonical and Incus must be quite happy with the new customers.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 12 hours ago

At first, I thought the products you were listening were "good softwares going to die". I was like "wut. Proxmox is fucking epic."

Proxmox is amazing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 50 points 1 day ago

We told them to go fuck themselves. We retain lawyer specifically in case we have legal concerns, and the way we use their products, price jack up would be so extreme that it’s entirely worth risking it while we migrate away.

load more comments
view more: next ›