A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
a breach of even 1p would trigger a fine of £83.30
Sounds extremely, extremely stupid. A breach of 1p should trigger repayment of 1p.
Also, a person should be notified at once, at the latest next month.
Also, why does the system even allow people to claim more than they are entitled? Is there no maximum set into the payment field or whatever they have for it?
In my experience, it's either total incompetence of the people in charge, or it's malicious in order to "catch" people doing something bad.
Like a bait car, but way more malicious since the person getting in the metaphorical car doesn't even know it's not their car because the keys worked, and nobody bothers stopping them for a few days so they get extra criminal charges.
It's malice. No doubt about it.
To be clear it's not a "claim." If you are full time caring for a member of the family you are entitled to get some money as a benefit, but only if you earn less than £196.00 (inclusive) per week. Because it was setup by the tories, if you earn more, you are no longer eligible and need to pay back the whole amount, instead of it being a sliding scale where earning more is subtracted from the stipend.
If it's anything like unemployment insurance claims, you could possibly be entitled to different amounts every week depending on whether you made income. But it's odd that it lets you get more than the max.
Starmer is working hard to force the working poor into bankruptcy.
Wtf is happening in the UK???
The same report released in May found the DWP had known since 2021 that overpayment of Carer's Allowance has left some people in financial difficulty.
Remind me when were last general elections again? Another conservative mine they left hanging about by sweeping it under the rug.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c20jln81w72o
Not a fan of labour but please give credit where its due, as to which government did nothing first.
The government currently in power is fully responsible as they could stop it entirely, they choose not to and are complicit.
"Fully responsible" huh? Like on day 1, or is there some sort of grace period? How long does a gov have to review all historic legislation? Is your timeframe based on empiric evidence or hopes and dreams? Why aren't the individuals who wrote and passed it "fully responsible"? Or does their culpability end the moment they vacate office?
Bureaucracy moves pretty slowly i think. We've got another few years to find out for sure.
The UK is absolutely cooked if a return to Blairism is the best they can come up with.
Why are Anglo-Saxon 'conservative' governments hell-bent on punishing the poor to the fullest extent. They no longer hide the strategy that cruelty is the point! And the general public seems to like it, and votes for it in ever greater numbers, until it happens to themselves, of course.
Can someone explain this to a person who grew up in a Rhineland model based society that is now fast adopting the Anglo Saxon model (the Netherlands).
If they take money from poor people, they can give tax breaks to the rich and still break even.
I lived in the UK for over a decade until Brexit, and frankly I think that by the time I left they were one of the most far-right countries in Europe, just in this English-upper-class style of posh words and the oppression done "elegantly" via extreme "rules" rather than the direct violence of the (not posh) populist far-right, - people are still made to hurt for the crime of being poor, and the system is designed to hurt anybody who would defy the local elites (just notice the conviction to years in jail of of Environmentalist demonstrators for blocking a road) but all the Ts are traced and Is are dotted, all prim and propper - so people from the outside don't really notice how so very close to Fascist Britain already is.
("It's the Law", say the far-right muppets over there, same as Nazi enablers would say in Nazi Germany.)
Rules on social security explicitly designed to make it likely that people make mistakes (this allowance apparently changes depending on a person's weekly income, which floats if you're in insecure employment, which is exactly the problem of the working poor, and it's down to the recipient to figure it out precisely, down to the pence, with no help) and then punishing them disproportionatelly hard for the error is exactly the style of "by the rules" hurting of people for being poor (and human, hence making mistakes) beloved by the Posh Fascists and their followers (of which there are many, as proven by Brexit which was the product of a campaign of Racism and Nationalistic Exceptionalism).
The cruelty is the point. I fucking hate this country.
Can they do the same with rich people and corporations? Error in subsidies, pay back 100 times the amount for the infraction. Now they often get a relatively small fine.
terf island again being shitty
Wait... An outrageous medical bill in the UK is ~13000 USD? An ambulance ride here costs 8k alone...
That's not an outrageous medical bill. It's an outrageous bill for clawing back government benefits for those whose full time care for family members prevents them from working.
No. Here's a good (albeit infuriating) explanation of what happened.
You linked the same article from the post.
Maybe the person I replied to will read it this time.