this post was submitted on 03 May 2025
38 points (100.0% liked)

Spaceflight

968 readers
49 users here now

Your one-stop shop for spaceflight news and discussion.

All serious posts related to spaceflight are welcome! JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, Roscosmos, ULA, RocketLab, Firefly, Relativity, Blue Origin, etc. (Arca and Pythom, if you must).

Other related space communities:

Related meme community:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Let me guess: SpaceX will be asked to pick up the slack?

[–] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 days ago

For launch, SpaceX, ULA, and Blue Origin seem like the next in line. For crew, SpaceX is currently really the only option.

[–] Trollception@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

It's often chosen since it's far more economical. The answer is usually money

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

SLS never really hit any goals just fucking corrupted bullshit

Guess who is one of key contracts on it...

Boeing 🤡

[–] doodledup@lemmy.world -2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

There was no need for another space race anyways.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 5 points 5 days ago

I don't care either way but if we are giving these parasites money, they need either deliver under the terms of contract or cash must be clawed back and executives should be given the rope for corruption

[–] Trollception@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

I liked the world better before they invented electricity 😭

[–] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

getting rid of SLS makes sense but we actually need gateway to practice for mars. Private companies could probably make their own Orion better

[–] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 days ago

I go back and forth on Gateway. A microgravity research station beyond LEO would be pretty helpful. Beyond that, though, it won't literally be part of a Mars transit architecture like some long forgotten proposals, and stopping there on the way to the surface is unnecessary added delta-v. SLS+Orion also can't fly often enough for Gateway to be its own destination or continuously crewed.

In my perfect world, there'd be continuously crewed lunar surface and orbital stations with commercial vehicles flying public and private missions to both. One day...

[–] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 days ago

Of course this still has to clear Congress, which has a lot of pork based reasons to think differently, but the cracks are showing in Artemis.

The program already relies on Starship or New Glenn being able to deliver crewed landers, so those obsolete SLS. Losing Gateway, the Lunar toll booth, bums me out as a space station fan, but I get it. I'm not clear on how they want to replace Orion yet.