this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
65 points (77.3% liked)

Showerthoughts

33896 readers
1017 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 17 hours ago

If this post the bar, it’s a low one to beat.

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 51 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Clearly language is already doomed judging by this post

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, dude, they're training on this shit.

[–] Yermaw@lemm.ee 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

So you're creating the doom you're prophecising?

Nicely played.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 26 points 22 hours ago

Perhaps AI could be used to rewrite this post so that it makes sense.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 11 points 19 hours ago

Languages, famously static constructs.

[–] Devadander@lemmy.world 10 points 19 hours ago

We have learned to imitoot you exarkly

[–] Jeeve65@ttrpg.network 23 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Do you really assume that language does not change if there is no AI involved in teaching? Try reading texts from a century – or even 50 years – ago.

I am not an AI fan but your argument is just fearmongering.

[–] TokenEffort@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 hours ago
[–] Kookie215@lemmy.world 12 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, languages evolve over time anyway. If I transported you back 200 years, you would sound like an idiot to everyone around you.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world -1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Thus making it more likely.

Edit

Ps you only have to go back 20 minutes to have me sounding like an idiot to everyone around me.

[–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 7 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Yeah, I believe your edit.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 5 points 20 hours ago

Well, look at USA alone and tell us how many accent they have. Globally there's like two way to pronounce the word "Herb" and "Data" and "gif"(pronounced like giraffe) and many other word, people still fighting over it yet there's no "correct" way to pronounce, both are legit. There's also the whole thing with dialect. Language, pronunciation, and all those thing, its always start from reading it wrong(as in not intended way), then people are taught the same thing on that region, then it became an accent or dialect or what have you. Turning back the clock 200 years from now, i'm pretty sure they talk differently.

This isn't in support in AI replacing teacher though, as learning lips movement is very important in teaching pronunciation. People talk differently because their lips and tongue move differently, and AI can't do that. They make sound with speaker, not manipulating how air leave the throat.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 6 points 23 hours ago

wrong

Incorrectly

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The rich will have actual human teachers, but the poor will be trained by AI. The result will be language diverging into two Eloi/Morlock-style subpopulations.

Though given that people acquire language from their peers, and invent what they need, Poorish will have a bland, almost mechanical formal register, and a lot of incomprehensible-to-outsiders slang about actual life stuff.

[–] listless@lemmy.cringecollective.io 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Newspeak double plus good.

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 1 points 11 hours ago

Oh. Duckspeak. Ungood bellyfeel.

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 3 points 21 hours ago

Then we have the garbage training data in, garbage out situation, but with one extra step.

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works -3 points 18 hours ago

tbh AI is a better explainer than a public school teacher, mainly because they don't make enough money to live off