this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
148 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38571 readers
355 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ask just about anybody, and they'll tell you that new cars are too expensive. In the wake of tariffs shaking the auto industry and with the Trump administration pledging to kill the federal EV incentive, that situation isn't looking to get better soon, especially for anyone wanting something battery-powered. Changing that overly spendy status quo is going to take something radical, and it's hard to get more radical than what Slate Auto has planned.

Meet the Slate Truck, a sub-$20,000 (after federal incentives) electric vehicle that enters production next year. It only seats two yet has a bed big enough to hold a sheet of plywood. It only does 150 miles on a charge, only comes in gray, and the only way to listen to music while driving is if you bring along your phone and a Bluetooth speaker. It is the bare minimum of what a modern car can be, and yet it's taken three years of development to get to this point.

But this is more than bargain-basement motoring. Slate is presenting its truck as minimalist design with DIY purpose, an attempt to not just go cheap but to create a new category of vehicle with a huge focus on personalization. That design also enables a low-cost approach to manufacturing that has caught the eye of major investors, reportedly including Jeff Bezos. It's been engineered and will be manufactured in America, but is this extreme simplification too much for American consumers?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tfm@europe.pub 1 points 44 minutes ago

And backed by Bezos

[–] nuko147@lemm.ee 3 points 6 hours ago

So they finally made a car for minimalists.

[–] Wigglet@beehaw.org 2 points 11 hours ago

So like a fully plastic Pickman?

[–] lattrommi@lemmy.ml 14 points 18 hours ago

The specs on the website don't have the number one statistic I care about: Can I, a 6'3" (190cm) man, fit comfortably inside without being forced to drive with my knees? It says it is 69" (175cm) tall which is not a promising sign. The website does not have warranty information yet either, the next most important thing for me. The fact it is mostly made in America, implies that it will probably break within a year which makes the price irrelevant. The lack of infotainment is a huge plus, I don't understand how those things are even legal. A laptop dock would be much more beneficial in my opinion. One which can easily slide out of sight, like when I'm actually driving and not just watching porn while stuck in a traffic jam. The option for hand crank windows pretty cool, so I can re-enact that one scene from the movie The Game if I want.

After really taking a deep look at the customization options I can't help but wonder, Am I dressing a Barbie or looking for a vehicle? Can I get the icon in cornflower blue? Is there an option to make the entire vehicle look like a 90's geocities page, including gifs? I spent who knows how long looking at the options and went to see what the price would be. Well guess what? I can't! Not without reserving one for $50. Even then I have no indication I'll be told the price. Sorry but I don't care what options there are, I'm not gonna pay one dollar, let alone fifty, if I can't see what the final price will be, even just an estimate would be nice. Am I supposed to trust the word of random news articles that it's actually under $20k with an asterisk? I don't care if the $50 is refundable. Any company that requires I speak to someone for the price of their product, is a company that is lying about the price of their product.

Great idea and almost a step in the right direction for cars (in my opinion). However, I can all but guarantee this would be a bad car for me to buy, because car salepeople and car engineers simply can't help but take any good idea and load it up with as much enshittification as they possibly can stuff in and then try to get the customer to pay more for heaps of shit on top, which they call icing but is really just shit, all while lying about every possible thing they can.

[–] pr06lefs@lemmy.ml 22 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Love it. No connection to the internet except when you choose to, through your phone. Analog controls. Frickin roll up windows!

My only beef with the current concept is the bolt on body panels and other parts. Too easy to steal. Could replace those bolts with security bolts, if they aren't already, but that just discourages the casuals.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

My only beef with the current concept is the bolt on body panels and other parts. Too easy to steal.

I mean the same could be said about Jeep Bronco. Although these just being plastic means they're probably not worth stealing...

[–] Hathaway@lemmy.zip 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Hathaway@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago

I laughed haha

[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 7 points 17 hours ago

Hell yeah. I actually emailed them and they confirmed that there's no data collection at all. That's extremely rare for any new car these days.

[–] ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I generally like the idea of smartphones as replacement for radio/nav but only if no specific app is required to do anything important with the car itself. Because then you are dependent on the manufacturer keeping this app up to date.

But the price for this thing is too high when incentives are excluded

[–] JillyB@beehaw.org 30 points 1 day ago (7 children)

No paint because you're injection molding body panels? Sounds good.

No stamping? How are you getting away with that? Are they just outsourcing the stamping for frame parts? There's no way this thing doesn't require stamped frame components.

Tbh, this feels like vaporware. I'll believe it when I see them actually being delivered.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 6 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

I think the non-stamping is the body panels. They would still have to have a stamped metal frame to meet the S rating wouldn't they?

[–] JillyB@beehaw.org 3 points 10 hours ago

They make it sound like not having stamping is helping them by not requiring expensive machines and a factory with a high ceiling. I'm betting they're outsourcing the stamping. I'm also betting that they won't ever deliver a truck.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A basic usable truck sounds good to me, but the price seems high for bare bones and the range seems equally bare bones.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I don't know how the purchasing power differs across the pond but converting dollarydoos to pounds that sounds like a bargain for a new functional EV

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Personally I think the telco is more compelling. If it wasn't american i would strongly consider it.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Looks cool but it's also twice as expensive.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

TIL 27.5k x 2 = 41.5k

This thing also has way more range as standard and basic accessories like speakers.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 2 points 4 hours ago

when I looked it was 41k, maybe there's a chapter trim option?

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 2 points 17 hours ago

This sounds kinda cool. I like that ability to be able to buy a wrap and slap it on yourself.

[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 21 points 1 day ago (7 children)

this strikes me as a fascinating idea--with a couple of eyebrow-raising backers--that is probably going to flop spectacularly because it's too minimalistic to the point of just being cheapskate

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

They look like excellent fleet trucks.

[–] kinttach@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›