this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
121 points (90.1% liked)

Asklemmy

43611 readers
1376 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

With such a push against single use plastic and mirco plastics etc. Why is glitter left untouched? surely it has to be one of the worse plastic pollutants. Currently getting our Christmas shop ready, and its on everything and gets everywhere!

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IoSapsai@lemm.ee 53 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Seeing the comments here and people don't even realise how widespread glitter is. It's in everything and used in a variety of industries. From pharmaceuticals to construction, to transport, vehicles, military... in fact the one of the biggest consumers of glitter is kept secret so who knows, could be the military. It won't surprise me. We really need to find an alternative.

[–] KittenBiscuits@lemm.ee 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I thought i read somewhere that the biggest consumers of glitter are the auto makers because it's in nearly all the paint.

[–] IoSapsai@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That sparkly quartz kitchen top? Yeah...crushed quartz and glitter to make it sparkle. As I said, it's everywhere.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 14 points 1 year ago

Interesting. Not surprising, but that's one I didn't think about.

Still, that's one use that's not making anything worse, right? I mean, that counter is going to be used for decades, and when it does go to the landfill, the glitter in it is hardly going to make a difference.

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I see you watched that YouTube video too πŸ˜‰

[–] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] federalreverse@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is from 2014. Can you still buy these products in the US?

At least in the EU, solid microplastics within cosmetics have been forbidden since 2018 (silicones etc. are still allowed unfortunately).

[–] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Hmm so it would seem. Most recent thing I found was from 11m ago and says the toothpaste theory is bunk but no real answer has been found.

[–] whitepawn@reddthat.com 36 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I’ll never argue in favor of glitter, but if we’re discussing micro plastics there’s this:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-43023-x

All the synthetic shit cloth you wear and/or sleep on has impact.

Likely to make more impact on this microplastic by buying cotton or bamboo than trying to ban glitter.

[–] funkajunk@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Damn, dude. I never even thought of synthetic fabrics as a source. Plastic is one of the worst things we could have ever made.

[–] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's also one of the most useful things we've ever made. Medical devices alone. The problem is mismanagement and overuse for profit by bad actors who lied to the world and said not to worry cause it's all being reused again and again in this closed feedback loop called recycling

[–] matcherock@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago

very good point

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

100% cotton gang on standby

[–] peter@feddit.uk 34 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I'd be surprised if there isn't a company making biodegradable glitter

[–] sizzler@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

The thing about glitter is, that it is often the waste from other processes cut up finely. You need those processes to use environmentally safe sheets of shiny paper.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 13 points 1 year ago
[–] redballooon@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

I’d buy it for 30x the price. 10 years after having two girls get ready for the millennium in my bathroom (which involved the liberal spraying of glitter) I could still find that shit in crevices.

[–] danhakimi@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

one quick DDG search, first result: https://thegoodglitter.com/

[–] Chozo@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Edible glitter already exists. I'd have to imagine that it is also biodegradable.

[–] phareous@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wouldn’t think it would have to be biodegradable, just inert and non-poisonous

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does that mean I can make my poop glitter?

[–] fiat_lux@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

You certainly can with mica. The downside is mica mining has definite links with child slave labour depending on the source, so, not as fun as hoped. https://brewglitter.com/collections/whiskey-liquor-glitters

[–] lemann@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Ooh I didn't know that, interesting stuff

[–] fiat_lux@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

I find their suggestions for DIY glitter questionable, and I couldn't tell you if all the article's information is accurate, but Sustainable Jungle's evaluation of current biodegradable glitters is worth a read, if you're interested in glitter formulas.

Tl;dr There is active research into cellulose nanocrystals for glitter, which would still have some ecologically negative impacts, but otherwise everything on the market is likely greenwashing, to various degrees.

[–] lemann@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd be surprised if there is, seeing as glitter is made from plastic and aluminium

It's also apparently used in certain types of kitchen surfaces (quartz or granite if i'm not mistaken) to give them a sparkly finish, not too sure people would be happy to find their kitchen surfaces shine "biodegraded" and looking duller after half a century lol

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The biggest culprits are probably polyester and acrylic fabrics, plus tires... and there isn't likely to be a will to do anything about those. But yeah, glitter is annoying.

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Glitter is a novelty in every use case, though.

Polyester is too, but it's a substantial and noticeable difference and improvement (a milestone even) as a life comfort. Glitter is just nice to look at.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Overall, there is just not a lot of plastic in glitter. It's incredible thin. It's like aluminium foil, while we use a lot of meters of foil as households, the kg used is quite little given the surface. And glitter is the same. Getting everyone to buy one less plastic chair is more than they'll use up in glitter over their entire life, basically.

[–] drekly@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ah so it's just tiny tiny little harmless microplastics. That shouldn't be of any concern... πŸ˜‘

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 9 points 1 year ago

Not compared to the amount of microplastic larger products with degrade into.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Glitter isn't microplastics.

Like, I'm not saying glitter is not a problematic and rather needless product, but on the list of problematic and rather needless products to get people away from it's quite far down the list.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] danhakimi@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

The concern is that glitter is smaller and harder to dispose of responsibly. It's likely to end up polluting the ground or the water, as opposed to something like a chair, which, having less surface area, and being disposed of as a whole piece after some decades, is not actually going to bleed that much.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 8 points 1 year ago

A lot of the glitter nowadays is biodegradable

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

The whole thing against single use plastic is for consumers not business.

Why not Glitter?

Because he's a paedo

[–] StarkillerX42@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Glitter is not a major micro plastic source, and people who buy glitter are probably not people who are worried about micro plastics anyways. Car tires are so much more of a micro plastics source that it's almost not worth worrying about other sources until we figure that one out.

[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think most glitters you can buy around here are biodegradable so that

[–] matcherock@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

unfortunately not.

from wiki: Modern glitter is usually manufactured from the combination of aluminum and plastic which is rarely recycled and finds its way into the aquatic habitats eventually becoming ingested by animals, leading some scientists to call for bans on plastic glitter.[8][9][10][11]

[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

around here

Was the key word

I know what glitter is but there's both edible and biodegradable glitter.

The latter is what I was referring to.

[–] flakeshake@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not all kinds of glitter is made of plastic ? AFAIK one of the oldest and most popular sources of glitter is mica, which is a mineral (or rather a group of minerals) ?