this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
121 points (90.1% liked)

Asklemmy

43611 readers
1220 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

With such a push against single use plastic and mirco plastics etc. Why is glitter left untouched? surely it has to be one of the worse plastic pollutants. Currently getting our Christmas shop ready, and its on everything and gets everywhere!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Carighan@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Overall, there is just not a lot of plastic in glitter. It's incredible thin. It's like aluminium foil, while we use a lot of meters of foil as households, the kg used is quite little given the surface. And glitter is the same. Getting everyone to buy one less plastic chair is more than they'll use up in glitter over their entire life, basically.

[โ€“] danhakimi@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

The concern is that glitter is smaller and harder to dispose of responsibly. It's likely to end up polluting the ground or the water, as opposed to something like a chair, which, having less surface area, and being disposed of as a whole piece after some decades, is not actually going to bleed that much.

[โ€“] drekly@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ah so it's just tiny tiny little harmless microplastics. That shouldn't be of any concern... ๐Ÿ˜‘

[โ€“] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 9 points 1 year ago

Not compared to the amount of microplastic larger products with degrade into.

[โ€“] Carighan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Glitter isn't microplastics.

Like, I'm not saying glitter is not a problematic and rather needless product, but on the list of problematic and rather needless products to get people away from it's quite far down the list.

[โ€“] drekly@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Surely nothing is less use than glitter?

[โ€“] Carighan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So everything is more or equally as useless as glitter? According to you? I'm confused now.