this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
146 points (88.8% liked)

Sync for Lemmy

15826 readers
3 users here now

πŸ‘€


Welcome to Sync for Lemmy!

Download Sync for Lemmy


Welcome to the official Sync for Lemmy community.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Community Rules


1- No advertising or spam.

All types of advertising and spam are restricted in this community.



Community Credits

Artwork and community banner by: @MargotRobbie@lemmy.world


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Edited the image to stop putting the person on blast.

all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 44 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I think a simple solution of letting user turn on and off the display name will be nice.

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You shouldn't need to disable display names just to combat the 0.01% of people with annoying names. NFKC normalization is a better solution.

[–] Exusia@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Counterpoint, only "0.01%" of names use annoying font. If thats all it takes to be noticeable, perhaps a toggle is better, then?

[–] holycrap@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Or just turn display names of for users with special characters

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Today I learned Lemmy accounts can have a display name. I thought it was just their account name.

[–] Exusia@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I never get to have a fancy font name.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Less jarring than emoji at least.

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What about a couple little emoji that onomatopoeia themselves into my username?

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

I don't know. How do you think I feel, Zipper Kangabell?

[–] cobysev@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I saw this post way back in September last year (which was quickly removed), and have been seeing this guy's custom name popping up everywhere since. It's very annoying. I'm all for blocking custom characters in display names.

[–] BananaOnionJuice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's a way to complicated suggestion

Instead do a sha256 of @

So veryfancyfakeuser@lemmy.fake

becomes

🌈cb76aae36c😘@lemmy.fake

And just to f with people add some emojis before and after.

[–] Huschke@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

AKA the Discord approach

[–] realharo@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is related another issue too, does lemmy do anything to deal with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IDN_homograph_attack?

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Not the original commenter, but it seems they're asking if lemmy is doing anything about imposters. These are all different characters: "Greek Ο (039F), Latin O (004F), and Cyrillic О (041E)" so someone could look like they have an official username, when really it's a different unicode character. Nothing to do with the actual IDN part, but moreso about the "homograph" part, or even more accurately, homoglyph

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I guess if someone were dumb enough to give money to a person on Lemmy just because they claimed to be Mr Beast or something. Otherwise I don't really see the "attack" part.

[–] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

@_________ac called out

Edited

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I edited the image to mask the name. Can you please delete this comment?

[–] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Fair. They had posted (and then deleted) a bunch of comments to this post asking to have it taken down, which is why I edited the image. It made them very anxious.

[–] Bell@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

How about they do whatever characters or emojis they want but the size is limited to xx pixels?

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That's not quite as straightforward as you think. These are emojis, they ARE text, just like letters from various languages...etc are also text.

It would be a hell of a lot easier just to ban non-ascii characters than to start changing the font size based on each individual character. This would also be something that every single client would have to implement themselves which they definitely would not, the rendering performance implications would turn it into more work than you would think.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

I would prefer to set the colours that I see, makes it easier to tell who is a commentor and who is OP

[–] Land_Strider@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Not gonna lie I like them so far. Helps understanding there is a person with some flair to them on the other side of the cold text.

However, customization should be a thought twice when implementing. However much anyone should be able to customize and make their stuff different, there should be options for the others to turn their own viewing experience into a rigid framework.

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 6 points 2 years ago

Yeah, would really appreciate a feature to toggle these nicks. Hope LJ is back from his current break soon

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't mind them and I don't understand what the outrage is about. I've been able to identify some of these individuals across threads because they tend to stand out and I find that very endearing from a community POV. I'd rather have some form of personalization rather than slapping everyone with a uniform.

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I don't think anyone is outraged. It's just an annoyance. I'm happily scrolling and reading titles and then N O T I C E M E!. It's a distraction.

A name alone is personalization enough.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

These posts sound more than an annoyance.

A name alone is personalization enough.

I don't think so. People literally pay for personalization and a customized experience. If it were enough, we wouldn't be here asking to normalize usernames in the first place.

[–] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How about just adding it in as a rendering option on the client side, making it so that they keep their usernames, but you can see the normal letter versions?

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's literally what I'm asking for with this post. πŸ€”

[–] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Ah, sorry, I didn't see the community you posted this in.