this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
2002 points (98.5% liked)

Games

37263 readers
1517 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 21 points 6 days ago

This is part of why confidence is attractive.

It isn't that confident humans of the male reproductive caste treat women more flippantly; it's that actual competency correlates with not being as much of an insufferable whiny piece of shit.

[–] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

That summary may also explain why some men are so insecure about women earning more money than them too.

[–] HalfSalesman@lemm.ee 11 points 6 days ago

I was a Halo 3 try hard and if anything I was nicer to female voices because I stupidly wanted to woo them. IDK exactly what the logistics of that would have been thinking back.

[–] Elevator7009@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

work to improve the skill gap or draw 20

acknowledge that one singular woman is currently better than you at this one particular skill or draw 20

man it's like there are options that don't involve aggression towards another person for… not being bad at a video game

I count myself lucky the men I know in real life are chill, and that I am not too interested in PvP games, scared off by the constant reinforcement from stories online that someone will be shitty to me because I am a woman. When I did play TF2 it was always pubs mic off and with a very gender-neutral username.

[–] drthunder@midwest.social 4 points 6 days ago

I got hit on a couple times in Starcraft 2 of all games just because I had a feminine-sounding username. I literally got "damn girl, look at that MMR" once and it's so funny.

[–] arotrios@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Incel in a nutshell:

Manchild in the brain!

Weird Al, take that one with my blessing and run for the hills... cause judging by the downvotes, the incels have my scent.

[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 134 points 1 week ago (5 children)

🌏👨‍🚀🔫👨‍🚀

[–] Balinares@pawb.social 30 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I am in mad love with this Darmok-ass comment.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 114 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I never understood this mentality, myself.

Gamers: "I never get laid... 😩"

Also Gamers: "Women are just kitchen accessories."

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

because you think of "I never get laid" as a normal human need to connect with another person, which is what it is but they're too deep in misogyny to realize it. instead to them getting laid is a quest to complete and it involves a quest item known as a woman, not a character. so I never get laid has less of an undertone of "why can't I connect with a woman" and more of "when will we get our government mandated sex slaves"

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Inf_V@kbin.earth 86 points 1 week ago (5 children)

"but behaved more submissively towards players with a male voice" I want to know what they mean by submissive

[–] thelasttoot@lemmy.world 90 points 1 week ago

They were less confrontational and more likely to accept direction

[–] Arbiter@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

They got into some freaky shit in those lobbies.

[–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 week ago

Appeal to authority. Higher-skilled male players got to call the shots, lead, delegate etc.

[–] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Same way you're "submissive" to your boss

[–] __nobodynowhere@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 week ago

butt stuff, gotcha

[–] squirrel@lemmy.blahaj.zone 77 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Obligatory footnote: EvoPsych is mostly bunk, deeply intertwined with eugenics and riddled with homophobia, sexism and rape apologia.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MoreFPSmorebetter@lemmy.zip 69 points 1 week ago (21 children)

I have ~10k hours in counterstrike across multi game versions and accounts. I noticed a similar thing over my years. The players doing well in a match were often neutral towards gamer girls, but the guy having a shit match would be the fastest sack of shit every time. Especially if one of the top fraggers pointed out they were being beaten by a girl.

Obviously there are always exceptions to any rules but in my anecdotal experience the guys who were confident in their abilities didn't care about women but losers would attack them just for speaking.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 67 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Well then the obvious conclusion is that respecting women makes you better at video games.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago

I have noticed that all of these misogynists are incredibly insecure alpha-pretending males. Can't imagine how tiring this constant fear must be.

[–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So my transition from cringe lord to become a better individual overall is actually just me getting better at video game? Fair enough

[–] MECHAGODZILLA2@midwest.social 1 points 6 days ago

Absolutely.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Shou@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Reminds me of this: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0361684319871913

In short. The higher the social status of the woman compared to the man, the more likely the man is to sexually objectify her. Wheras women aren't more likely to do this based on relative status.

Objectification is defined as reducing a person to solely looks and sexual function.

Similar stuff is seen in primates. Females are easier targets to assert dominance over. Since they are physically weaker. Male long tail maqacues losing their status, would seek out younger/weaker targets to establish dominance over. Something that was interesting too, is that female maqacues with more masculine facial features, were less often subjected to dominance seeking behaviour (from both males and females if I recall correctly) than females with more feminine faces.

It seems to boil down to "who can I dominate with little risk?" Female? Easy. Big male? Stupid idea. Young male? No problem. Male of equal size? Potentially.

[–] liv@lemmy.nz 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

That thing about macaques is interesting.

[–] FlapJackFlapper@lemm.ee 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hate is often just a reflection of insecurities and a product of attempting to alleviate cognitive dissonance. Someone feels scared, doesn't like feeling that way, and so converts their fear into anger -- misdirected at someone else.

[–] tacobellhop@midwest.social 5 points 6 days ago

Balance is the key. True that fear leads to anger and anger to hatred and a path of the dark side, but the Jedi were also guilty of dealing in absolutes until they were fighting outright fascism via space capitalism and clone contracts they built killed them all.

[–] umbraroze@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

I remember the last time I got messaged by some misogynist dipshit, way back in Halo 5, blaming me for losing the game. ...When he was the worst performing player in the team. I just stared at the post game report and wondered how the heck the dude even managed to get a ranking as low as he did.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

My daughter wanted to wear my headset when I was playing battlefield once. It was so funny listening to those losers rage because they Were getting stomped by a 5 yr old girl. Now days she still puts it on from time to time and it's still hilarious.

load more comments
view more: next ›