this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
652 points (97.4% liked)

Open Source

33698 readers
584 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've seen many threads suggesting products but they often don't mention FOSS projects, which should always be preferred to corporate software. With FOSS you are already boycotting capitalism, on either side. Free and Open Source ignores borders and shouldn't be categorized in nationalist terms, no matter where some of the maintainers happen to live.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blackbeard@feddit.it 1 points 6 hours ago

Not sure why you say that, all projects I'm seeing they ALL include FOSS, sometimes they just specify if one is European and another one no. Also, and to be fair this is the main reason your post make no sense, there is not only software but mainly services and goods as core part of the projects.

[–] m532@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 13 hours ago

More like "buy white"

The white supremacists think trump bailed on them so they are desperate to hold the remains of their fourth reich together

And of course they hate FOSS, because they hate freedom

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 82 points 2 days ago (1 children)

FOSS is not American. Foss belongs to literally everyone.

[–] Ilgaz@lemm.ee 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I kept saying it all over the place regarding the fascistic rejection of Russian (as in race) code and got flamed as result. These people use FOSS, especially GNU/GPL software and yet they have no clue about the license themselves.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Weren't Russian contributors (from very specific sanctioned companies) rejected from contributing because of US sanction laws and with Linux Foundation being HQ'd in the US?

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think that was mainly due to the concern of hostile actors committing code to the kernel.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think it was US OFAC sanctions

https://www.linuxfoundation.org/blog/navigating-global-regulations-and-open-source-us-ofac-sanctions

https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/23/linus_torvalds_affirms_expulsion_of/ (links to the OFAC sanctions set up after Russia invade Ukraine)

The OFAC sanctions do have quite a few lists, with one of them being "Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions", so it could be fear of harmful actions and not just retaliation for the invasion

[–] St0ner@lemmy.wtf 20 points 1 day ago

I've tried to extol the virtues of FOSS for a long time. Not many people even care about it or their privacy, always parroting the adage "If i do nothing wrong what do I need to worry about" without a further thought.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 83 points 2 days ago

Free software is the antithesis of capitalism. It doesn't make sense to boycott them.

[–] koncertejo@lemmy.ml 32 points 2 days ago

I always like to say the fruits of FOSS labour are the common heritage of mankind. It belongs to all of us as a public good, created and maintained by selfless workers. (Nevermind the fact that most FOSS projects are based out of Europe anyways).

[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 52 points 2 days ago (10 children)

I'm the most anti-American user on here and I agree.

I'd rather use USA-linked free software than Spotify.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] giacomo@lemm.ee 94 points 2 days ago (6 children)

lol who is suggesting boycotting foss projects?

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 43 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I think OP means that one shouldn't boycott FOSS projects just because they are from USA. That said, I don't like to be told what I have to do and don't agree to "FOSS projects, which should always be preferred to corporate software". My pc, my LAN, my rules.

[–] not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago (12 children)

you seem to hold your individual freedoms high, there is a kind of software i think you'll really like

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I don’t like to be told what I have to do and don’t agree to “FOSS projects, which should always be preferred to corporate software”. My pc, my LAN, my rules.

...he said, without a hint of irony.

Meanwhile, "my PC, my LAN, my rules" is precisely the reason I do agree with always preferring FOSS to corporate software.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 63 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Seeing people look for corporate social media alternatives is painful.

[–] chebra@mstdn.io 51 points 2 days ago (21 children)

@Irelephant

> "Hey guys, I want to leave X, should I go to Bluesky or Threads? What? Mastodon? Never heard of that. Looks very complicated, I'll pass"
> -- CEO, founder, IT wizz on LinkedIn

Every time!

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thericofactor@sh.itjust.works 64 points 2 days ago (5 children)

From a purely "vote with your wallet" standpoint it doesn't make sense, because there's no money paid. However, one might worry about data/information getting in the hands of a fascist/compromised government. So I think people should judge this themselves case by case.

[–] m532@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 13 hours ago

Voting with wallet is oligarchy

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 27 points 2 days ago

I think the important part is about who is running the server, rather than who made the software

The fediverse is interesting in that context because each instance can decide where they set up the infrastructure or how they process data / requests. The same applies to self hosting

I saw an article that outlined which country each fediverse platform "originated" from, such as Canada for Pixelfed and Germany for Mastodon. That's fun to know about, but otherwise not important to users compared to the instances themselves

At most it might speak to which laws will govern the project itself, but even then someone can fork a project that goes astray

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 2 days ago

Is someone doing that? If it's FOSS it's from the internet.

[–] not3ottersinacoat@lemmy.ca 41 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Counterpoint: Fedora is a testing bed for Red Hat. One of Red Hat's notable customers is the US military. I'd prefer to stay off that path if I can help it. It's a matter of trust, and it's a matter of indirectly contributing. I've seen people say the same things about Deepin and everyone nods in agreement, but why the hell should I trust a US project, for the same reasons?

[–] RushLana@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 2 days ago

Honestly this should be a wake call to the FOSS community that we are way too reliant on the US.

Every default we have is US centric and if FOSS is really meant for everyone we should move away from that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Agree with the main point, though disagree that FOSS is "boycotting capitalism", many for-profit companies contribute to FOSS and FOSS can be used by for-profit companies too, much of today's capitalism runs on FOSS.

The point of free software is that it does not have owners, so what exactly are you "boycotting"?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ksp@jlai.lu 21 points 2 days ago (6 children)

I get it as an European that it means more to me to consume "locally" and to prioritize services that are European-based. But due to the nature of computers and FOSS, borders are redefined and it is more about ideas and politics rather than physical location. However, computers and servers are also physical and submitted to legislations of countries, we cannot ignore laws such as the Patriot act and the power that the American state can have even on FOSS projects.

For me the priority is to use software that match my needs; if I have the choice between an American and an European solution, I'll tend to choose the latter one.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago

Lol, first time I hear that, as European😆 what a stupid movement..

[–] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

FOSS is definitely not boycotting capitalism, but its still an objectively good thing. I see FOSS work as a way for relatively rich imperial core citizens to give back to the world.

Definitely do not boycott FOSS projects.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›