this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
258 points (95.1% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5893 readers
837 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SabinStargem@lemmings.world 1 points 12 minutes ago

I think Capitalism is reaching a dead end, just as Feudalism had. We will need a completely different approach, specifically designed to bring prosperity and political agency to every person. A rebuilt constitution that isn't just about political rules, but also economic.

These times will either cause Americans to show the way forward to the globe, or be a disastrous example to avoid repeating. Either way, the American Experiment is reaching a crescendo.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

Literally the majority of the video is just random left-bashing lmao

And then proposing "super-capitalism" as a solution what an absolute clown

[–] drkt@scribe.disroot.org 1 points 48 minutes ago (1 children)

are you against worker co-ops?

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 46 minutes ago (1 children)

Did you reply to the wrong comment?

[–] drkt@scribe.disroot.org 0 points 10 minutes ago

Are you?

Adam Something has repeatedly used "Super Capitalism" as a conservative-friendly way of saying worker co-ops. You'd know this if you paid attention to the video, or watched his other videos.

[–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 0 points 13 minutes ago (1 children)

Did you watch a different video? He said that reality-challenged tankie spaces aren't able to contribute to a leftist movement that is able to attract workers.

That sounds entirely accurate to me.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 minutes ago* (last edited 5 minutes ago)

tankie spaces aren’t able to contribute to a leftist movement

Right, like I said, left-bashing.

Btw, is Hasan Piker a tankie? Because he bashed him too, and he's by far the largest leftist politics streamer with an enormous influence and broad appeal. But I guess he's not ideologically pure enough for Adam Something so therefore he's a tankie and useless.

His whole way of thinking is entirely idealist, as if creating an ideologically pure movement (ironically, by ditching any semblance of socialism including even the word, in favor of "super capitalism"), the left will automatically win. Nowhere in the video does he discuss any positive vision or any actually strategy other than punching left. Obviously, he serves as nothing but an off-ramp to get people to abandon leftist ideas they might otherwise be inclined towards, the only question is whether he's doing it intentionally or is just a useful idiot of the right.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 4 points 4 hours ago

At this point I’m convinced the only way to defeat Trump and his band of Nazis is to shoot them all in their fucking faces.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 6 hours ago

I'm 50:50 there will be another election. And I'm 50:50 on it being rigged if there is one.

Even if we have one, and it's not rigged, the Dems are proposing absolute jack shit for the people. So I don't see how they could even win a fair election.

We need a new party or a serious nation wide event if we want to put an end to projec 2025

[–] almost1337@lemm.ee 76 points 9 hours ago (5 children)

Well, the Democrats won't be the ones to do it.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 50 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Holy shit, that second bullet point. The hundreds of thousands of people donating small sums of money are somehow less representative of the electorate than the two hundred people donating over a million dollars each, because reasons (just not mathematically sound ones)

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 21 points 8 hours ago

It's the 4th bullet point that gets me. "We should spend more time going to right-wing-dominated spaces (and also restaurants)". Because only right-wing communities are "real". Anything lefties do is elitist.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

The second bullet point is itself a paradox. By definition hundreds of small donations would represent the electorate better than individual large donors.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Is this verified? If so, congratulations, Democratic party leadership. Once again, you're planning on doing the exact opposite of what you should be doing. Their leftist voter turnout is going to plummet again while they try court Republicans—who often vote by party rather than policy.

The party should "embrace-patriotism, community, and traditional American imagery

Playing into nostalgia and nationalism. A strategy taken straight from the other party's playbook.

Democrats should "ban far-left candidate questionnaires and refuse to participate in forums that create ideological purity tests" and "move away from the dominances small-dollars donors whose preferences may not align with the broader electorate"

Condemning progressiveness, leaving their policies either to do nothing or slide the country even more into conservatism.

Abandoning their actual "small-dollars" donors (constituents) whose preferences may not align with ~~the broader electorate~~ the corporate donors.

They should "push back against far-left staffers and groups that exert a disproportionate influence on policy-and messaging"

Going to screw progressive politicians yet again, leaving only moderates and conservatives.

Candidates should "get out of elite circles and into real communities (e.g., tailgates, gun shows, local restaurants, churches)"

Actively and deliberately court voters from conservative hotspots.

The party needs to "own the failures of Democratic governance in large cities and commit to improving local government."

Either this means the goal is deregulation, or that they don't plan on addressing issues outside of rural areas. Maybe both.

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 17 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

“Meet me in the middle,” says the leopard.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmings.world 1 points 6 minutes ago

The Geronocrats and MAGATs are the foolish clown that hops into the mouth of the beast.

[–] Fester@lemm.ee 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

People really need to show up to the primaries from now on. Tired of this shit.

[–] __nobodynowhere@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 hours ago

Do they still have super delegates?

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

This is how you continue to lose. The first bullet point is correct. The rest is fail.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 13 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The first dot point is incorrect. They should not embrace that right wing nonsense.

[–] Shirasho@lemmings.world 10 points 7 hours ago

Correct. Patriotism should be the result, not the means.

[–] h4x0r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

leftism

In a sane world Bernie would be considered a centrist.

[–] stopdropandprole@lemmy.world 17 points 6 hours ago

Bernie was the compromise. now it's Luigi time.

[–] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 8 hours ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 20 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Could already have had two terms of Bernie (or Gore too), but humans, eh.

[–] stopdropandprole@lemmy.world 10 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

certain, specific humans, have a great deal more culpability than others.

less useful blaming billions when a couple dozen people engineered the choices for the rest of us, especially on climate.

the biggest problem opposition groups have nowadays is targeting the wrong people to oppose. I know who my enemies are and it's not so self defeatingly simplistic as humans = bad.

[–] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 40 points 9 hours ago

If the democratic machine would let him. He'd do a bang up job. But the DNC will mobilize all they have to stop him. Damn the cost. Just as they've done in the past.

[–] Nemean_lion@lemmy.ca 10 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Actually there is one way. And I think you know what it is.

[–] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 9 hours ago
[–] WatDabney@fedia.io 8 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

That's what the voters have been trying to tell the DNC since 2016.

But the DNC's ears are plugged with corporate cash.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Ears? It's more like every orifice being plugged with corporate cash.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 6 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

is trough leftism like a trough urinal?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PapaSkwat@lemy.lol 6 points 8 hours ago

Call me crazy, but I want an answer before 2028.

load more comments
view more: next ›