this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
257 points (95.1% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5893 readers
837 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
257
The only way to defeat Trump may be trough Bernie Sanders-style leftism (youtu.be)
submitted 9 hours ago by richardisaguy@lemmy.world to c/climate@slrpnk.net
61 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] almost1337@lemm.ee 75 points 9 hours ago (5 children)

Well, the Democrats won't be the ones to do it.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 50 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Holy shit, that second bullet point. The hundreds of thousands of people donating small sums of money are somehow less representative of the electorate than the two hundred people donating over a million dollars each, because reasons (just not mathematically sound ones)

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

The second bullet point is itself a paradox. By definition hundreds of small donations would represent the electorate better than individual large donors.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 21 points 8 hours ago

It's the 4th bullet point that gets me. "We should spend more time going to right-wing-dominated spaces (and also restaurants)". Because only right-wing communities are "real". Anything lefties do is elitist.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Is this verified? If so, congratulations, Democratic party leadership. Once again, you're planning on doing the exact opposite of what you should be doing. Their leftist voter turnout is going to plummet again while they try court Republicans—who often vote by party rather than policy.

The party should "embrace-patriotism, community, and traditional American imagery

Playing into nostalgia and nationalism. A strategy taken straight from the other party's playbook.

Democrats should "ban far-left candidate questionnaires and refuse to participate in forums that create ideological purity tests" and "move away from the dominances small-dollars donors whose preferences may not align with the broader electorate"

Condemning progressiveness, leaving their policies either to do nothing or slide the country even more into conservatism.

Abandoning their actual "small-dollars" donors (constituents) whose preferences may not align with ~~the broader electorate~~ the corporate donors.

They should "push back against far-left staffers and groups that exert a disproportionate influence on policy-and messaging"

Going to screw progressive politicians yet again, leaving only moderates and conservatives.

Candidates should "get out of elite circles and into real communities (e.g., tailgates, gun shows, local restaurants, churches)"

Actively and deliberately court voters from conservative hotspots.

The party needs to "own the failures of Democratic governance in large cities and commit to improving local government."

Either this means the goal is deregulation, or that they don't plan on addressing issues outside of rural areas. Maybe both.

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 17 points 8 hours ago

“Meet me in the middle,” says the leopard.

[–] Fester@lemm.ee 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

People really need to show up to the primaries from now on. Tired of this shit.

[–] __nobodynowhere@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 hours ago

Do they still have super delegates?

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

This is how you continue to lose. The first bullet point is correct. The rest is fail.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 13 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The first dot point is incorrect. They should not embrace that right wing nonsense.

[–] Shirasho@lemmings.world 10 points 7 hours ago

Correct. Patriotism should be the result, not the means.