this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
216 points (97.4% liked)

science

20194 readers
373 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In launch event on Friday, agency shared plans to test over US cities to see if it’s quiet enough by engaging ‘the people below’

Nasa has unveiled a one-of-a-kind quiet supersonic aircraft as part of the US space agency’s mission to make commercial supersonic flight possible.

In a joint ceremony with Lockheed Martin Skunk Works in Palmdale, California, on Friday, Nasa revealed the X-59, an experimental aircraft that is expected to fly at 1.4 times the speed of sound – or 925mph (1,488 km/h).

The aircraft, which stands at 99.7ft (30.4 metres) long and 29.5ft wide, has a thin, tapered nose that comprises nearly a third of the aircraft’s full length – a feature designed to disperse shock waves that would typically surround supersonic aircraft and result in sonic booms.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 39 points 2 years ago (5 children)

pretty neat that the image of the plane for the article is shot from so close that you can only see 1/3 of it, but to be fair it does include the screens of people's phones as they take a picture of the thing. kind of like going to a concert.

[–] Nudding@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Haha I wonder about the ungodly amount of fuel it burns.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 8 points 2 years ago

The website blasted me in the ass with ads, while simultaneously begging for donations

[–] Marsupial@quokk.au 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah but with the pictures on the phones, we actually end up with more picture per picture with this method.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Yo dawg, I heard you like pictures

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's proportions make it hard to frame it for an article headline picture. This is cropped to show a colorful array of the fun parts: cockpit, landing gear engine intake with a clear X-59. It's like trying to make a cover picture feature a pencil.

This other article uses a dramatic background to fill the space. It's from NASA though, so they're not limited to the conference. They don't have to have their own picture to say "I was there"

https://kbin.social/m/technology@lemmy.world/t/758938

[–] Landsharkgun@midwest.social 23 points 2 years ago (17 children)

Please don't. We need to be reducing air travel, not increasing it. Go invent a quiet supersonic train or something.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

the transatlantic railway is feeling less and less like a funny absurdist joke by the hour

[–] MrBusiness@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago

Let's get started on the Snowpiercer too

[–] Narauko@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (4 children)

What is your plan for intercontinental travel? Increased ship travel, taking a week and burning massive amounts of crude fuel oil? Just cut off the Americas and Australia from Europe, Africa and Asia for non-commercial purposes? The supersonics have mostly been used for trans-atlantic and trans-pacific travel.

[–] llii@feddit.de 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Less and more efficient airplanes. Supersonic aircraft will consume more fuel.

[–] MrBusiness@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 years ago

Let's get weird with blimps

[–] HollandJim@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

These kinds of comments only say it’s wrong; they never make a valid contribution to finding a solution.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gaael@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That is not said often enough, thank you !

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

Now the fuel efficiency problem needs to be reckened with. The sonic boom was the main reason why supersonic planes were shelved but poor fuel efficiency was the other 800 pound gorilla in the room.

[–] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's what we really need right now. Faster air travel for fewer people.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

But how else will the ultra-wealthy jet over to their summer homes in new Zealand when wet bulb temperatures exceed human survival in the Northern Hemisphere?

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Pierce said the X-59’s job would be to “collect data from the people below, determine if that sonic thump is acceptable and then turn the data over to US and international regulatory authorities in hopes to then lift that ban”.

Why can’t commercial airlines fund the project, then? Why is NASA investing public money to deregulate private industry?

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 41 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Huh? NASA is providing thought leadership to expand the possibilities of human travel, but has no interest in running a commercial airline.

Many technologies you use every day started as NASA research

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DistractedDev@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago

The first A in NASA is aeronautics. They just do the science. I would say deregulation is a fairly strong word here. It's more like they'd be updating the laws to reflect modern tech.

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago (3 children)

This is literally how every expensive R&D project gets done. Private companies won't dump this kind of money into good R&D, but the government will because they don't care about ROI.

[–] You999@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

Except this ignores the existence of bell labs, you know the private R&D lab with ten Nobel prizes and a laundry list of inventions that quite literally shaped our modern world.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Steve@startrek.website 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Deregulate is not the same as engineering a solution to solve the problem that was previously solved by regulations.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago

This is probably defense spending, tbh.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

American is a Socialist country for those wealthy enough.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] blazera@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Looks to me like a climate change accelerator for rich people. Fewer people per flight, spending more fuel to go faster.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I would be disappointed if the prototype isn't nicknamed Pinocchio.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This is pretty amazing! This thing could take people from Los Angeles to NYC in 3 hours. The science behind the noise baffling is really cool.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Wouldn't suborbital flight be a lot more fuel efficient?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NESSI3@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] Kage520@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They are still in the prototype stage. If they can prove the physics on small planes, they can scale up for commercial ones.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›