this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
886 points (99.8% liked)

World News

41225 readers
3176 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff, in a CNN interview with Jake Tapper, failed to specify any Russian concessions in a potential Ukraine peace deal despite detailing demands on Ukraine.

After claiming a "friendship" with Putin, Witkoff spoke vaguely about "territorial" and "economic" concessions from both sides. He also claimed a U.S.-Ukraine deal on raw earth minerals would be signed soon.

When confronted with Russian state TV footage suggesting Trump’s stance aligns with Putin’s, Witkoff insisted diplomacy requires communication.

His remarks fueled concerns over Trump’s approach to Russia and Ukraine.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

Their concession is sending someone to listen to the Trump guy.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 17 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

We all knew the so-called "peace deal" was going to be rough but "US takes this half, Russia takes that half" is a new low even for him.

The EU needs to step up it's war machine. More manufacturing, more army, more WMDs. If we can't rely on the US then we need our own.

Sure, all that is expensive, but not half as expensive as not having it. There's a lot to be said for having a big stick you never have to use.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 5 minutes ago

We all knew the so-called “peace deal” was going to be rough but “US takes this half, Russia takes that half” is a new low even for him.

Its pretty on par, being honest.

I mean, last time, it was Poland.

[–] gon@lemm.ee 17 points 6 hours ago
[–] Yash2120@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Yewah poor bohy

[–] el_bhm@lemm.ee 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Weird way to spell capitulation.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 4 minutes ago

Its "Molotov-Ribbentrop". That's the term you're looking for.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov-Ribbentrop_Pact

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 25 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] mtcerio@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Well at least he did not lie then!

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 26 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

President Krasnov is a fucking bitch

[–] Yash2120@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago
[–] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 119 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (13 children)

I remain unimpressed by CNN reporters because he has not asked the most important question: What will guarantee Russia's adherence to any kind of peace deal?

It's boring to repost it the Nth time but the 1994 Budapest Memorandum was quite clear about these matters:

  1. Respect the signatory's independence and sovereignty in the existing borders
  2. Refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of the signatories...
  3. Refrain from economic coercion designed to subordinate to their own interest...
  4. Seek immediate Security Council action to provide assistance to the signatory if they "should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used".

Yet, putin kicked nearly every single point in the memorandum the moment he felt ready. Why would the same leader act differently in the future?

It's eerily similar in my view to the Abraham accords. Trump negotiated bypassing Palestinians and then we got Oct 7 and the war that spiraled from it. These "deals" are as flimsy as a CyberTruck, but it's also very trumpy. He gets to act like a peacemaker and then his successor will deal with the consequent shit. Same thing happened in Afghanistan.

*edit: also, if someone wants to be "fair" (i'd rather say naive) one can consider the official Russian narrative, but again that narrative explicitly goes against the Budapest Memorandum, meaning, they are very open about not respecting treaties they sign.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 31 points 16 hours ago

CNN was bought by a right wing shitbag. They are FOX News in a trench coat

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 163 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I've seen a LOT of russian/trump, "it's a mystery if they're in bed together" type posts for the past few days. It made me pull out the bookmarks from the first term. Here is some ammo if anyone needs it (other stuff is mixed in). Remember, leave the link and depart. If you're explaining, you're losing.

https://sh.itjust.works/post/33277983

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 28 points 20 hours ago

"Haven't they paid enough with the lives of their dear boys?"

[–] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 104 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (15 children)

Meanwhile Zelensky is saying he'll give up the presidency in exchange for NATO membership.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn9vx01evp9o

[–] prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca 70 points 19 hours ago (6 children)

Is that a concession? I don't think he actually wants to be president anymore.

Don't get me wrong, it's the correct "deal" to make - it's the most overt declaration he can make to those who claim he wants to be dictator for life - I just think it's probably a win/win for him.

[–] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 67 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Win win win to be honest. It's just further proof he doesn't want to be the dictator he's accused of being.

[–] Spzi@lemm.ee 27 points 16 hours ago

And further proof he's the much better diplomat/politician than those who exclude him.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 30 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Is that a concession?

It's absolutely a concession, and a very big one too. It's a concession to the Trump allegations that Zelenskyy is a dictator. And this bullshit argument was given as one of the reasons he wasn't invited to the talks in Saudi Arabia.

I don’t think he actually wants to be president anymore.

Doesn't change the fact that it's a very big concession.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 122 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

That's because there aren't any.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Should keep negotiation going, don't make any deal with Krasnov Trump too early. Always say it is due to US betrayal in Budapest Memorandum.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 27 points 19 hours ago

The blind leading the lame

[–] Ciderpunk@lemmy.world 53 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

Incredible that Trump remains so mad that Obama got a Nobel Peace Prize that he’s willing to literally just order an ally to give up so he can claim he made the peace and demand his prize. He really was just entirely broken by a black man being president.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 66 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

This has nothing to do with obama or peace prizes.

Trump is an agent of putin's will and he's carrying out russia's foreign policy by demanding the full surrender of ukraine.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›