this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2025
110 points (99.1% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7576 readers
132 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Excerpt:

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has ordered the digital and physical destruction of 18 publications on workplace safety practices, according to an internal February 7 email obtained by Popular Information. The email says the publications have been removed from the OSHA website and tells staff that any physical copies should be "disposed of or recycled."

The purge appears to be part of the Trump administration's effort to terminate any activities associated with "diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility," or DEIA. The email advises OSHA staff that "[i]f you have wallet cards that include language, or can be interpreted, on DEIA or gender ideology, please dispose of them as well."

Popular Information has obtained archived versions of most of the deleted publications. Almost all of them are not associated with DEIA topics but appear to have been targeted because they include a DEIA-related keyword used in a completely different context.

For example, one of the purged publications is "OSHA Best Practices for Protecting EMS Responders During Treatment and Transport of Victims of Hazardous Substance Releases." Popular Information was able to obtain an archived version of the publication through the Internet Archive. The 104-page document — a collaboration between dozens of government agencies and NGOs — was published in 2009 to detail the steps "employers need to take to protect their EMS responders from becoming additional victims while on the front line of medical response." DEIA issues are not discussed.

On page 94 of the publication, however, the words "diversity" and "diverse" are used in a context that has nothing to do with race or gender. The publication notes there is a "diversity of state-specific certification, training, and regulatory requirements" for "EMS agencies" and "diverse conditions under which EMS responders could work." Similarly, on page 96, the publication notes, "EMS responders are a diverse group" and "risks vary with their primary and secondary roles."

"Guidelines for Nursing Homes: Ergonomics for the Prevention of Musculoskeletal Disorders," is a 44-page publication released in 2009. It provides "recommendations for nursing home employers to help reduce the number and severity of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) in their facilities." It has nothing to do with DEIA. On page 10, however, it notes that "development of MSDs may be related to genetic causes, gender, age, and other factors." The single use of the word "gender" appears to have flagged the publication for deletion and destruction.

Another purged publication, "Small Entity Compliance Guide for the Respiratory Protection Standard," contains the sentence, "[t]he new computer software reflects the concept of government leadership through collaboration with diverse technical organizations." It has nothing to do with DEIA.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kitnaht@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

"Botched". My ass. They know what they're doing.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

this kind of worker protection probably won't get as much coverage in media, but will be the most important type of destruction they intend to make.

[–] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At what point can/will people just say no. Come down here and purge these documents yourself. Shitbags have refused marriage licenses to gay couples. Why should this be any different.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Where I live, OSHA-equivalent is often enforced by the unions before it ever goes to the government. The construction union is large and powerful enough to stop work, (allegedly) lock scabs in sheds and demand their right to health and safety, remember that their lives are at risk so they really care about it.

[–] swaggyspinozista@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The purpose of a system is what it does

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

No, but in this case, yes.

[–] meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The boneheaded purge of OSHA docs reeks of algorithm-driven myopia. Keyword hunts without context—because why bother understanding content when you can just Ctrl+F your way to incompetence? Musk’s DOGE squad, high on their own bureaucratic farts, axed decades of safety protocols over stray mentions of "diversity." Not a peep about DEIA, just collateral damage in the culture war.

Imagine torching guidelines on EMS responders’ safety because the word "diverse" described regulatory landscapes. Efficiency theater at its finest. Next up: deleting the Constitution over "equality" clauses. But hey, who needs workplace safety when you’ve got performative anti-wokeness?

This isn’t governance—it’s arson. The real DEI here is Disregard, Erasure, Incompetence. When these clowns inevitably nuke something critical, maybe the masses will wake up. Until then, enjoy the dumpster fire.

[–] FatCrab@lemmy.one 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I wouldn't even call it algorithm-driven myopia but rather myopically-designed algorithmic idiocy. It isn't wildly challenging to design a filter to capture semantic context before recommending action on a piece of text, even if the underlying reasoning is wildly petty ratfuckery. It isn't just the petty meandering cruelty with these dumb pieces of shit, though that's certainly enough to merit outrage. It's the combination with historic incompetence that just exponentially amplifies that outrage. Here's to a mario party to roll in 2026.

[–] meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 days ago

The problem isn't just the algorithmic idiocy—it’s the deliberate abdication of responsibility. Designing a semantic filter isn’t rocket science; it’s laziness disguised as innovation. They don’t care if the system bulldozes nuance or context because the goal isn’t accuracy—it’s plausible deniability.

This isn’t about incompetence; it’s about priorities. They’d rather torch decades of regulatory safeguards than risk offending the culture war peanut gallery. The collateral damage? Worker safety, public trust, and any pretense of governance.

And you're right—this isn’t just a "mistake." It’s a calculated bet that no one will notice until it’s too late. By then, they’ll have moved on to their next act of bureaucratic vandalism. We’re not watching progress; we’re watching a slow-motion collapse dressed up as efficiency.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Speaking of algorithmic, maybe give reeks a rest already, so you sound less like a bot.

Thanks for pointing this out.
I'm definitely labelling this account as a "Likely chatGPT Bot" after glancing through that history.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Snippity snap, that's quite the comment history. I tend to have a rotating stable of preferred vocabulary words, but not like that!

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They do respond sometimes, but with the same predictable form. And they never back up their vague pronouncements with links, even when it’s pointed out to them. Instead you’ll be told that you reek of condescension, desparation, performativity, projection, intellectual laziness, etc. Always on the attack, never defending a position, instead dodging & weaving. It’s bad faith motte-and-bailey rhetoric.

Oooh, I didn't know about that fallacy! Thanks for sharing, I'll add it to my fallacy gallery.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Aaand they’ve already used it three more times. Pseudo-profound, cookie-cutter rhetoric.