this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
292 points (98.3% liked)

World News

36907 readers
1021 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 66 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Stapleton said she now relies more on filtered water at her home in New Jersey.

But study co-author Beizhan Yan, a Columbia environmental chemist who increased his tap water usage, pointed out that filters themselves can be a problem by introducing plastics.

“There’s just no win,” Stapleton said.

Oh, man.

[–] nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br 28 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I've been saying this to people for a long time. Here in my country, most water filters are based on charcoal and a final filtering element. That element used to be made of cellulose and other organic materials, but in the last decade, they started coming with that element made of polypropylene, until all the cellulose ones disappeared from the market. Just imagine your water passing though a porous layer of plastic, like a rigid sponge... this is a serious microplastic source.

[–] ripcord@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You're talking like .01% as much plastic use per liter as plastic bottle water packs. Is that not....much much better?

[–] nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br 7 points 2 years ago

I'm not sure how much microplastics are released in that way. It can be better than bottles, but if we used non plastic materials for so long, and it worked fine, I see no reason to put plastic in there.

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Plastic is like lead, there shouldnt be any in our systems

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ripcord@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

But the filters introduce way way fewer.plastics...?

[–] porkins@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Distill water, then add minerals back into it, and bottle in glass, profit.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Probably the best way. Distillation uses a lot of electricity, doesn't it?

[–] porkins@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Not necessarily. It just requires excitation at a molecular level. You can get creative with your source. They have been playing around with low energy methods like LED or even just using the sun, geothermal, etc.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Resistive heating is 100% efficient at turning electrical energy into heat

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mouserat@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

”The International Bottled Water Association said in a statement: “There currently is both a lack of standardised [measuring] methods and no scientific consensus on the potential health impacts of nano- and microplastic particles. Therefore, media reports about these particles in drinking water do nothing more than unnecessarily scare consumers.”

Fuck capitalism - "no don't be too cautious, just consume until we can finally prove what tiny particles accumulated in your organs can do. How bad can it be?"

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 5 points 2 years ago

This is the same attitude the US Food and Drug administration takes. A product can only be scrutinized if a new ingredient is proven to be harmful.

[–] ripcord@kbin.social 19 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Yet another reason to quit buying so much bottled water

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I guess. It seems like it doesn’t matter tho because it’s not just bottled water. It’s literally everything.

All the food you eat. Anything you drink. The air you breathe. The clothes you wear. Literally everything you interact with has some amount of plastic that you’re consuming.

You can put down the bottled water but the alternatives aren’t much better. Either way you’re being bombarded by microplastics.

[–] cerulean_blue@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

Oh, How I long for the olden days... I would literally die for a fresh glass of water plucked from a local stream. The copious amounts of lead and mercury combine with the rich abundance of feces, microbacteria and other organic matter, to create a pure, natural live giving elixir.

Now all of that has been removed and replaced with modern plastic. No thanks

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago

Yet another reason to quit buying ~~so much~~ bottled water...

[–] toastal@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

Would be nice if I could drink the tap water here

[–] variants@possumpat.io 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I wonder how the refillable plastic 5 gallons are with plastic, we need to go back when they were made of glass

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Someone needs to invent soft glass that doesnt break so easily. Surely it cant be that hard.

[–] Bocky@lemmy.today 5 points 2 years ago

It’s not too hard, but it’s more costly, and consumers want a cheap as possible.

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

Borosilicate glass fits the ticket (what pyrex is made of) but is quite expensive.

[–] The_Mike_Drop@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So plastic is made from oil, right? And oil is made from Dinosaurs. So we're just surrounded by Dinosaurs. Even micro-Dino's.

Is this their revenge?

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oil comes from decaying organic matter, mostly trees and vegetation.

[–] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

shhh he likes to think gasoline is a triceratops

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jagungal@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I've seen a lot of reporting on finding microplastics in new places and new quantities, but is there reliable evidence that it actually does damage? Genuinely asking, can someone please send me the papers?

[–] TammyTobacco@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think it's still a bit early for us to know how it's affecting us. It's the kind of data that takes a lifetime of micro plastics to see how it will kill us. But knowing how much cancer various plastics already give us, it's safe to assume this is a bad thing.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This isn't like smoking or drinking. There isn't any control group. We have no population to compare a lifetime of microplastic exposure against. It isn't like lead, either. Plastics pollution to date guarantees a continuous supply of microplastics for decades/centuries.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Spitfire@pawb.social 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Oh boy I sure do love plastic with my water.

Realistically though, is there any way to really filter out these?

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Plastic-digesting microbes.

[–] devious@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I am a plastic digesting mega organism apparently!

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

You're not digesting it; it's slowly disrupting all your systems.

[–] Artemis@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Sawyer tap filters remove 100% of microplastics (which I'm really hoping is legit!). They fit right on your tap and other than looking a bit funny work great. Just replaced my Brita filter with one a few weeks ago.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Quoting as 100% effective is a good indicator of bullshit in any scenario

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago

Well also that tap water filters are usually a giant plastic contaminant themselves.

[–] averyminya@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

What makes its limitation 500 gallons "per day"?

[–] ripcord@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Best filter is to not have them in the first place

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

Pretty soon drinking water is going to have to go through a centrifuge first haha.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Does this include like nalgenes and camelbacks and things of that nature?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

Are they just guessing? Measurements are pretty definative

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Well I mean how awesome am I going to get plastic in my system? It's not like that stuff just grows on trees.

load more comments
view more: next ›