this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
448 points (94.6% liked)

Linux

56329 readers
794 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Image shows a tweet with the header "and people STILL try to convince me Linux and Windows are better when the DATA clearly shows otherwise. SMH" with an image attached showing the following:

"Operating systems by current version" Mac OS: 14 Windows: 11 Linux: 6

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 103 points 2 years ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Klear@lemmy.world 73 points 2 years ago

This is why Bioshock Infinite is the best game ever made.

[–] fschaupp@lemmy.ml 43 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Shoud we tell her/him/... about Gnome 45?

[–] Jorgelino@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] kwedd@feddit.nl 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This checks out, because Windows 2000 is the best Windows!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 8 points 2 years ago

Just use 'them' like a normal person

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 years ago (7 children)

The Linux Kernel version is at 6 point something, I think they're working on version 7. That's not the OS though, the current Ubuntu version under LTS is 22.04. That's more than twice as much as Windows.

Note I had to get this information from Wikipedia because Ubuntu's website is currently unusable corporate garbagepuke.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] gianmarco@feddit.it 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Limitless_screaming@kbin.social 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Fedora 39
Manjaro 23
Ubuntu 23
Linux Mint 21
Debian 12

[–] flyos@jlai.lu 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I raise to you the current version of openSUSE Tumbleweed: 20240108! I think we've got the winner...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gerdesj@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My phone is on 23. Nextcloud is on 27.

I'm Arch and so is my wife (actually) and it doesn't have a version. We just roll ... and today my dongled, wireless mouse has stopped moving. The buttons still work and my laptop touchpad works fine.

wtf!

[–] Limit@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago

They make a pill for that...

[–] davemeech@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 years ago

Smh my head

[–] SapphironZA@lemmings.world 14 points 2 years ago

It's also a reflection of how much money you will be spending on each ecosystem

[–] risencode@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 years ago

Aren't there meme communities where you could put this instead?

[–] nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

non ironically, firefox did a jump in version numbers after firefox 4 because people were seeing the low number compared to other browsers, and would think they were behind technically.

[–] toastal@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

While true & I remember folks actually using this in arguments for ‘slow development’, there is some merit to versioning differently for something expected to get minor updates to perpetually follow latest specs such. I can’t imagine trying to discern what a “breaking change” would be in this context. Or would you make a new version for every visual redesign? Dates might have just made more sense, but maybe ESR is easier to follow with the current scheme.

[–] Acters@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

One of those bigger numbers is better herd instincts

[–] tho@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago

freebsd is 14 something too

[–] TheUncannyObserver@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This has got to be satire, right? You posted this ironically. I don’t believe for a moment anyone could be this dense on accident.

[–] leopold@lemmy.kde.social 12 points 2 years ago

Yes. It's a joke. It's pretty funny, IMO. I'm not sure how you could interpret it as anything else. The wording alone makes it pretty obvious.

[–] UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

but wouldnt lower numbers mean no one needed to fix & revamp a working OS?

higher numbers mean more fuckups than needed to be fixed until it was so broken there was no longer a way to code you way out, had to start right from the start!

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 10 points 2 years ago

no it just means the OS is abandoned obviously, don't you know that any library with no commits in the last 20 minutes is not worth using /s

[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

It really depends on what versioning means for the project. If we are talking about semantic versioning then a lower number only means there haven't been many breaking changes over time. Or that a lot of broken stuff has been kept that way because it would break compatibility.

[–] dan@upvote.au 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Wait until they discover that Windows Server 2022 exists. Also, Windows 2000.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (10 children)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] don@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I use HAL 9000. Get up on my level.

[–] HAL_9_TRILLION@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago

I remain unimpressed.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago

Meanwhile, ChromeOS 120 is off the scale

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm going to invoke Poe's Law and not assume this is sarcasm.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PanArab@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

That's nothing! Darwin is on version 23.

[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Are we sure this isn't satire?

[–] Korne127@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

…no? It obviously is

[–] Samsy@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (5 children)

If people really get triggered by this bullshit graph, let's add Arch Linux which is on what? >200? >300?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] HowMany@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Wow.! A graph and everything.

[–] Grangle1@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Lowest version number, lowest need for radical change to keep up to date. Golf rules. Linux wins. Somebody get Tux a green jacket.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago

linux doesn't have a panther checkmate

[–] ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago

FACTS don't care about your feelings! Study reveals Macos is 2 1/3 times better than Linux, massive 27% improvement over Windows!

[–] joeldebruijn@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

MacOS according to other metrics tho. ... https://xkcd.com/1056/

load more comments
view more: next ›