This is actually probably as good as any US copyright shit can be. Wholly generated works aren't copyrightable, but an actual artist using an AI to do some generative fill or something on a photo isn't screwed out of their ownership. Time will tell how it actually gets used I guess
this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
32 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13691 readers
46 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
In practice they'll wholly generate things and lie through their teeth in court and to the copyright office -- the government will take them at face value.
The race to the bottom is on.
The race to the bottom is in its 70th consecutive yearly round
I think this has been the standard for a while? Just like how re-tellings of public domain works can qualify for copyright.