this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
239 points (94.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27799 readers
1401 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Please state in which country your phrase tends to be used, what the phrase is, and what it should be.

Example:

In America, recently came across "back-petal", instead of back-pedal. Also, still hearing "for all intensive purposes" instead of "for all intents and purposes".

(page 6) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] twice_twotimes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Using “uncomfy” instead of uncomfortable. I recognize this one is fully style, but it’s like nails on a chalkboard. Break the entirely fake rules of grammar and spelling all you want, but have some decency when it comes to connotation.

Comfy is an informal and almost diminutive form (not technically, but it follows the structure so it kinda feels like it) of comfortable. You have to have a degree of comfort to use the less formal “comfy,” so uncomfy is just…paradoxical? Oxymoronic? Ironic? I’d be ok with it used for humor, but not in earnest.

Relatedly, for me “comfy” is necessarily referring to physical comfort, not emotional. I can be either comfy or comfortable in a soft fuzzy chair. I can be comfortable in a new social situation. I can be uncomfortable in either. I can be uncomfy in neither, because that would be ridiculous.

FWIW I would never actually correct someone on this. I would immediately have my linguist card revoked, and I can’t point to a real fake grammatical rule that would make it “incorrect” even if I wanted to. But this is the one and only English usage thing I hate, and I hate it very, very much.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I really hate it when us media uses the word "ouster".

For example:

https://www.kpcw.org/ski-resorts/2025-01-27/vail-resorts-shareholder-calls-for-ouster-of-ceo-cfo-and-rob-katz

"Vail Resorts shareholder calls for ouster of CEO, CFO and Rob Katz"

They mean to use the word here as "removal", but "oust" is also a verb and "ouster" would be "one who ousts".

So, calls for the ouster of the CEO/CFO to do what?

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What I really hate is when people don’t capitalize the abbreviation US, because it makes me think they’re saying “us” as in “we,” or “oui” as the French like to say, no?

😀

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago

I think the ouster is supposed to be the event that results in ousting. But it's so redundant it's not funny. Removal would be for much better.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Using loose instead of lose.

[–] poweruser@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 day ago

I'm losing friends for loosing dogs on useless losers' loose use of lose and loose

[–] Today@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

"If" with nothing before it after it. If you'll call me back... That means nothing! If you call me then we can talk. I would appreciate it if you would call me back.

[–] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I feel like the vast majority of people online use "yay or nay" instead of "yea or nay".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"The proof is in the pudding."

The actual phrase is: "The proof of the pudding is in the eating."

It means that your dessert might look and smell delicious, but if you fucked up the recipe, say by using salt instead of sugar, then it will taste bad. You won't know for sure until you eat it. So, a plan might look good on paper but be a disaster when implemented.

"The proof is in the pudding" doesn't mean anything.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hushable@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As a non native speaker, it really irks me when people mix up "brake" and "breake", specially among car enthusiasts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jyl@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Some weirdos write decades as possessive. Writing "90's" implies that there's a 90 that owns something.

[–] wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

It's not a decade thing. People do that anytime they're not sure if it's a "s situation" or a "ies situation", or confusing with some other plural problem.

[–] hakase@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This entire thread is /c/badlinguistics

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›