this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
211 points (94.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27799 readers
1382 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Please state in which country your phrase tends to be used, what the phrase is, and what it should be.

Example:

In America, recently came across "back-petal", instead of back-pedal. Also, still hearing "for all intensive purposes" instead of "for all intents and purposes".

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kagu@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

"that begs the question". I wish people would just use the more correct "raises the question", especially people doing educational/academic content. I hear it across the English-speaking internet

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] eponymous_anonymous@sh.itjust.works 25 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

“Toe the party line” To align with the interests of a political party; to get in line with the agenda of the leader of a political party

“Tow the party line” Something to do with tugboats

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 8000gnat@reddthat.com 3 points 8 hours ago

Idiocracy is literally a documentary anymore

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

They're, you're

Sneak peek

In portuguese: mas/mais - people often use "mais" (plus, sum) when the correct would be mas (but)

[–] naun@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

What do people say wrong istead of "sneek peek"?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] viralJ@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

I'm not entirely against it, but I'm amused by how common it is to put "whole" inside of "another", making it "a whole nother". Can anyone give any other use of the word "nother"?

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe it works like fucking

A-fucking-nother

A-whole-nother

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] con_fig@programming.dev 6 points 12 hours ago

It's other, another is a whole other issue... heh

[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 3 points 10 hours ago

Q: "Did she do that?"
A: "No it was nother"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] twice_twotimes@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Using “uncomfy” instead of uncomfortable. I recognize this one is fully style, but it’s like nails on a chalkboard. Break the entirely fake rules of grammar and spelling all you want, but have some decency when it comes to connotation.

Comfy is an informal and almost diminutive form (not technically, but it follows the structure so it kinda feels like it) of comfortable. You have to have a degree of comfort to use the less formal “comfy,” so uncomfy is just…paradoxical? Oxymoronic? Ironic? I’d be ok with it used for humor, but not in earnest.

Relatedly, for me “comfy” is necessarily referring to physical comfort, not emotional. I can be either comfy or comfortable in a soft fuzzy chair. I can be comfortable in a new social situation. I can be uncomfortable in either. I can be uncomfy in neither, because that would be ridiculous.

FWIW I would never actually correct someone on this. I would immediately have my linguist card revoked, and I can’t point to a real fake grammatical rule that would make it “incorrect” even if I wanted to. But this is the one and only English usage thing I hate, and I hate it very, very much.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theedqueen@lemmy.world 47 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (4 children)

English/US - seeing “would of” instead of “would’ve”or “would have”. This one bugs me the most.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 13 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

People using 'yourself' and 'myself' instead of 'you' and 'me' when trying to sound formal or posh. You don't sound formal or posh, you sound ill-educated.

[–] viralJ@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I remember once being on a call with some customer support guy who didn't seem to even be aware that words "you" and "me" exist. My favourite part of the conversation was when he said "let myself put yourself on hold while I ask a senior colleague to clarify this for myself".

[–] SpiderShoeCult@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 hours ago

were they speaking hiberno-english by any chance?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›