This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
The biggest thing deepseek did though is that it exposed entire US "AI" industry for the grifters that they are.
These same parasites ruined crypto too
It's not open-source, stop spreading disinformation. The core of the product are the model weights and no source is provided for them, making them irreproducible. This is as open source as distributing a single exe file because after all you can read the assembly code, no?
I prefer to call these models "open-weights". However, "open-source" is widely used and understood in this context. Not an intentional disinformation.
You are fighting a losing battle. I understand why you think that, but the organization that owns the trademarks of open source do not agree with you (or me). I also disagree with that organization's definition of open source AI, but they own the legal right to define the meaning of "open source" in the technology trade, the trade in which they own the trade mark. But laws are laws and you either abide by them (as a corp, what are you gonna do?) or don't (fuck yeah, commit crimes).
Weights are the only thing you'll get from "open source" ai. You need to look for stricter legal definitions to meet your understandable criteria.
I've used the original title of the article and checked some sources.
https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V2/blob/main/LICENSE-CODE
https://github.com/huggingface/open-r1
Give me better sources and i'll change the title. 👇
Still waiting for links, but feel free to downvote instead 🤷
Please show me an LLM model that is really open source. My understanding is that most of the open models are open weights. For the record Mistral is also releasing Open weights models.
The fact that no widely used LLM is open source is not a good reason to change its meaning.
