this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
63 points (86.2% liked)

Technology

61263 readers
3775 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
63
What is DeepSeek: China's (*)open-source AI research lab which rivals OpenAI [Context] (www.business-standard.com)
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by ekZepp@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

  • Chinese AI lab DeepSeek launched the DeepSeek-R1 model, rivaling OpenAI in math reasoning and code generation.

  • The model is (in part?*)open-sourced for global research use.

  • Requires way less computing power than competitors like Meta.

  • Competes with OpenAI in critical areas such as mathematical reasoning, code generation, and cost efficiency

  • Overcame U.S. chip export restrictions through optimized architecture.

  • Big Tech are sore loosers

*DeepSeek employs a dual licensing structure for its models. The codebase for DeepSeek-Coder-V2 is released under the MIT License, which allows unrestricted use, modification, and distribution. However, the pre-trained models are governed by the DeepSeek License Agreement, permitting research and commercial use with specific restrictions to prevent harmful applications. While DeepSeek's models are open in many aspects, some argue they do not fully meet all criteria for being considered "open source" due to these licensing nuances

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

You are fighting a losing battle. I understand why you think that, but the organization that owns the trademarks of open source do not agree with you (or me). I also disagree with that organization's definition of open source AI, but they own the legal right to define the meaning of "open source" in the technology trade, the trade in which they own the trade mark. But laws are laws and you either abide by them (as a corp, what are you gonna do?) or don't (fuck yeah, commit crimes).

Weights are the only thing you'll get from "open source" ai. You need to look for stricter legal definitions to meet your understandable criteria.