this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
119 points (93.4% liked)

politics

19455 readers
3513 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Despite previously attempting to ban TikTok over national security concerns, Donald Trump now champions the platform, which went offline in the U.S. Sunday under a controversial ban upheld by the Supreme Court.

TikTok is good for Trump because it is a maelstrom of disinformation so massive that even Elon Musk-controlled Twitter cannot compete.

The app’s algorithm spreads disinformation and emotionally manipulative content, which boosts Trump’s messaging.

Critics warn that TikTok fosters disconnection, exploiting empathy to exhaust users and distract them from meaningful real-world action.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 26 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Or or or, hear me out: Trump knows that 170 million Americans use tiktok and banning it is unpopular. It also helps that his billionaire buddy owns 15% of bytedance and tiktok's CEO has been sucking up to Trump.

You don't need conspiracies to explain a politician doing something that helps their public perception.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 2 points 2 days ago

Watching all of this from a place of indifference, it's absolutely fascinating watching liberals and even conservatives process this whole saga in real-time

It's one of those increasingly common moments where the lack of ideological coherence creates chaos until a common perspective gets worked out.

[–] MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think it just shows that he is for sale. Policy decisions to the highest bidder.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes we know this. He literally said on Lies Social that you can buy him out for a billion dollars.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 days ago

Dollarmocracy

[–] Letme@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Social media is now literally running the country and controlling the faucets on the disinformation. Now they have TikTok too. 1984 is here folks, and more than 2/3 of the country sat back smugly staring at themselves in their precious smartphone mirrors while it happened.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I always had a low opinion of the typical user's general awareness of security and privacy concerns as I watched the Eternal September unfold (and tried to stay abreast of things and educate myself all the while), but I think it's getting worse over time.

People clamoring to use things like FB was evidence of that, but now it's on to....TikTok. If people don't think that's a concern, I think they are either actively deluding themselves or just completely oblivious.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works -5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Nor is this a "free speech" issue. The right to speak out, even online, has not changed. The government's authority here is to determine what foreign companies are allowed to operate within our borders, a nearly ironclad power.

This could be true if the ban was content-neutral but, on the contrary, the ban is explicitly intended to limit Americans' access to content that the government disapproves of. The right to free speech includes the right to hear. Americans have the right to listen to Chinese propaganda if they so choose and banning TikTok is exactly the same sort of censorship (differing only in degree) as the Chinese government's censorship of information coming from outside China.

The whole idea of using government coercion to control "disinformation" is censorious in a way that violates the 1st amendment. People have the right to speak, the right to listen to, and the right to encourage others to listen to even the things that the government considers to be harmful lies.

I don't care why Trump reverses the TikTok ban, as long as he does.