this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
67 points (74.1% liked)

Asklemmy

44413 readers
911 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't know if I'm going crazy but looking at the current situation in the world ... please tell me that I'm overexagurating

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 1 points 18 hours ago

There are bad things happening in the world, conflicts, ecological disasters, economic upheavels, and political upheavals. It's easy to look at these bad things and assume things are much worse than they are. Nobody wants there to be a world war 3.

When Trump was elected again I spent about 3 weeks living with an existential dread I've never in my life felt before.

Whenever it happens, it is coming.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

1 to 2 years no. Next decade sure. The super powers are isolating themselves as their economies become less entwined I expect something to happen.

[–] lorty@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Very likely, yes.

[–] guy@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You are probably overexaggerating.
There are increased conflicts over the world but no signs of a world war.

First there are no willing candidates for it. Not even Russia which is engaged in a war is willing to make the push to engage NATO, which is the closest to a world war we would get.
Neither is Iran willing to go into war which was very obvious after their actions when Israel made ample opportunities for them to escalate conflict.
And for China.. well war is bad for business, and China really likes doing business.

However the US with Trump at the helm. 🀷 Who the fuck knows. Maybe not world war but I am adding military occupation of Panama and Greenland to my bingo just in case.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

WW3 began in 2022

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe next decade, doubt it will be the next 2 years.

[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

I assume the time span was because of a certain penis potato. Sorry, I mean dictator.

It already started.

[–] Hubi@feddit.org 95 points 2 days ago (5 children)

please tell me that I’m overexagurating

You're overexaggerating.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

this person needs to tell us what about the "current situation" they think is so bad before we can assess how mentally diverse they are

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Could already be going. We didn't name them World War 1 and World War 2 until after they were over

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I don't think so.

Primarily because there's not economic benefit in it for the ruling class.

Also, we've made the experience of the war in the middle east around 2000 where the USA couldn't even occupy a farmer's state for more than a couple years.

I don't think anybody realistically thinks they can take over another (big) country in this time.

[–] dx1@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

Primarily because there’s not economic benefit in it for the ruling class.

Our history of perpetual war seems to disprove this

[–] con_fig@programming.dev 10 points 1 day ago

Famously the same was said about WWI re the economic benefit.

Nah, there won't be WW3. Instead we get countries sabotaging each other via hacking critical infrastructure, proxy wars, propaganda, trade wars.

I doubt there will ever be a direct "hot war" between the top five nuclear powers ever again.

WW3 is not what's gonna kill people, climate change is more likely gonna be humanity's downfall.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago

No thanks. Appreciate the offer though, very kind of you.

[–] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You're not overexagerating, the property crisis in the imperial core is becoming so severe that there are only 2 solutions, either the people rebel against its ruling class or they side with them and engage in yet another settler project. In my honest opinion, the latter seems like the most probably outcome, its already very advanced in Palestine and its starting in Syria.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago (9 children)

No. It’s bad for the economy.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί