this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
1043 points (97.9% liked)

memes

11009 readers
2868 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Meanwhile there's https://loops.video/ and you should share that like I'm doing with your friends that are hooked on tiktok.

Cuz, fuck, this banning our voice thing is getting old.

[–] Statick@programming.dev 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Pretty sure they're getting the internet hug of death atm.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Lol. Very true. And on a weekend! Lol. With great pow...app comes a bunch of users.

[–] s_s@lemm.ee 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"TikTok is influencing you politically"

So you'll shut down Fox News, right?

[–] Shard@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Facebook too. Don't forget Cambridge Analytica

[–] vegantomato@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I support blocking Facebook and X from the EU for the same reason.

[–] transitinoir@slrpnk.net 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I support blocking commercial, proprietary and centralized social media everywhere.

[–] vegantomato@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I don't like to be that guy, however if we play with your idea, there are some issues you will need to consider.

Centralization If we ban centralization then IRC, Signal, Xenforo, vBulletin, you name it will be forbidden as well. There is a reason why we always see some degree of centralization. Federation is tricky to get right from a technical point of view. Even when you have federation, each unit in that "web" will usually have a centralized moderation team and administration.

Proprietary Sometimes, spam/abuse is fought with the help of obscurity. In other words, service providers will hide exactly how they detect spam to prevent spammers from adapting and bypass their technique. Even Signal does this. They have a small proprietary piece of code, specifically designed to fight spam/abuse. The rest of their code is open source as far as I know. Can you suggest a comparable alternative?

Commercial Do you mean that they at most should be non-profit? And if so, why?

[–] transitinoir@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 hours ago

If we ban centralization then IRC, Signal, Xenforo, vBulletin

Signal is not social media, IRC is an open protocol, isn't it? I do not know about the rest.

Even when you have federation, each unit in that “web” will usually have a centralized moderation team and administration.

I do not have a problem with that. The problem with centralized social media is that users are locked in to using some specific app because all their friends are there, which makes it harder to switch. This gives monopolies like Facebook an unfair advantage.

Can you suggest a comparable alternative?

I dunno, how Lemmy does this?

Do you mean that they at most should be non-profit? And if so, why?

Yes I mean that. For-profit social media profits from increasing user engagement, even if that means through getting people addicted, intentionally not dealing with misinformation (because misinformation is usually more outrageous and gets people more engaged), data collection and other unethical practices, all because shareholders need the line to go up.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Apparently, Meta has just taken part in a huge destabilizing propaganda campaign here in Brazil. The kind that criminal law has punishment for.

It will certainly take a while to gather all evidence and verify it, so I'm saving the popcorn for later. But I just ensured I have enough kernel for a US-sized portion...

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It will certainly take a while to gather all evidence and verify it

So … if the evidence hasn’t been gathered yet what makes you think it’s happening?

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

They suddenly showing select videos more times than they have users on the country.

The evidence needed is to determine who exactly and why. The what is very clear.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago

"Hey! We can't let them steal that. I wanted to steal that!"

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is the most literate take on the issue that I've seen.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] comador@lemmy.world 71 points 2 days ago

Government: We don't like competition.

[–] Pulsar@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I don't like or use TikTok, but when I see US politicians and TV "Security experts" spiting nonsense arguments to justify banning it shows to me that this is a frivolous case to benefit META and Alphabet rather than a genuine concern in data collection and privacy.

[–] Burninator05@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No one gives a shit if your data is collected. I (and presumably you) are not worthwhile targets. The issue is the Chinese government using social media apps based in China to feed anti-US/pro-Chinese propaganda. I'd bet $100 that if (mostly likely when) China invades Taiwan all Chinese owned social media outlets will instantly feature lots of anti-Taiwan content in every country that they may turn for help to try and turn the US population's opinion more favorable to China's side.

[–] Power_Dive@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

This has already happened in douyin, Chinese version of tiktok.

[–] rarbg@lemmy.zip 40 points 2 days ago (1 children)

US government couldn’t give two shits if TikTok steals your data. They just don’t want a foreign adversary to.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Also, they don't care about the data. They care about the influence.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Political interference, that's what people need to fear from the platform. I'm sure if it was Russian I wouldn't have to say it.

Hell, just look at the number of pro TikTok memes being shared right now, there's something fishy happening.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

just look at the number of pro TikTok memes being shared right now, there's something fishy happening.

If by "fishy" you mean "the ban is going into effect so people are expressing frustration", sure.

[–] anas@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don’t think I see pro-TikTok memes, but rather “why stop at TikTok” memes

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

As far as I understand TikTok is used as the main example but it will apply to all similar Chinese (or just Bytedance owned?) platforms.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Honestly at this point I rather have China steal my data vs. The US government. I'd be more likely to see a negative impact from data collection from the US government rather than China. China can't really influence my insurance rates. The US can.

[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 29 points 2 days ago

"Actually, I want to own it"

load more comments
view more: next ›