A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
Related communities:
I'm living in a city with a housing situation that's fucked even if you have a halfway good income, and my lease will end this year.
I am lucky enough to have a safety net of friends and family, but if I didn't, I could very much face homelessness this year, as someone who's employed, and "functioning" in the eyes of society.
Sometimes I have half a mind to go to spend the rest of my existance in some remote monestary, but I feel I am not quite religious to the necessary degree. Or at all.
If homelessness was a choice, ~~no one~~ very few people would be homeless because why would someone choose to be homeless?
I have a friend who chose it. Had a job with early retirement pension, was buying a house he could afford. They made a minor adjustment to his contract and he snapped, quit the job, abandoned the mortgage and let the house go back to the bank, and took his son and moved to California to live in his car. Ten years later he's still doing that. He works occasionally as a delivery driver when he feels like it.
When you only are responsible for yourself this is a legit thing in my eyes. If this is the life he prefers and he is happy, go ahead.
Doing this when you have a child is an irresponsible asshole move in my opinion. You are forcing your child into a live that just can't be as healthy for them, physically and mentaly, then a more secure setting (that he had before) would be.
Yeah I agree on both sides. His son is an adult now and still lives a life much like his dad. It's too bad he was raised in that situation. When I call him a friend, he's really just one of the few high school friends I've kept in touch with. We live far from each other but we say hi online a couple times a year and we had lunch together about a year ago when I was in California for a wedding.
Being a free range human has its perks...it's the way we are meant to be
There actually is a very small group of people who do it willingly. Emphasis on very small
Does somebody to actually say that? I'd like to ask whether somebody worth listening to is actually saying that, but in this place that filters out way too many people.
I am disgusted that poverty continues to be considered a failing of the individual when it should in reality be considered a failing of the group, and that group is America as a whole.
Seriously, do other countries struggle with homelessness anywhere near this badly?
In Germany we have had a significant rise in homelessness lately. Hompless people are present in every city. France feels very much the same when I visit. Britain has loads of them.
We as a group maybe is not just US-Americans after all, but the minority world (the "West") as a whole.
It's a systemic issue, that is for sure. It just not on my the US system that is fucked. Maybe a bit more fucked, as Homelessness is more widespread that in Europe. But defenetly not exclusive to the US.
Yes. Parts of Canada have serious homelessness problems and many cities like mine like to pretend we don't. Our mayor routinely gets the police involved to relocate them and then is just like see problem solved!
There’s still time to donate to Trump’s inauguration fund in order to get federal disaster relief.
/s
Yes, My friend,
When I was homeless,
I had “chosen” to be disabled,
“chosen” to live in a country where applying for benefits takes years,
“chosen” to live in a country where healthcare costs weren’t covered after I lost my job,
“chosen” to live in a country where the landlord’s profit was more important than my survival.
It's still a choice.
It's just not a choice you made.
Homeless increased 18% last year, 13% in 2023. Source: AP news
It is a choice though, a choice by the oligarchs and policy makers who run this shit show of a planet. It just isn't a choice on behalf of the people who are actually suffering.
will smith burned a town to the ground with a single hadouken and it's still going
it- it understands dark humour and sarcasm? huh
If it's a legitimate fire, the house has ways of shutting that whole thing down
It’s a choice, just not a choice made by the homeless.
Oh shit! Truth bomb!
It is a choice. An intentional policy choice. Made by our government on behalf of an oligarchy of parasitic oxygen thieves who should all be killed.
But most of yall aren't ready for that discussion.
But most of yall aren’t ready for that discussion.
Do you know where you are
This is a .world comm, anything that doesn't repeat CIA introduced facts is usually banned for misinformation, and anything that threatens or challenges the world is that US capitalism is the best thing for humanity is banned and suppressed.
Lemmy servers aren't that well separated from each other. Saying that stuff anywhere on Lemmy is preaching to the choir.
You'd think so, but . world's TOS is a poison that tends to enshittify all its comms eventually. It's also absolutely not preaching to the choir on e.g. world or news .world.
I hear the same sentiment here daily. It's a highly popular sentiment too.
If .world is trying to silence it then they're doing a piss poor job.
1950 called, they want their manufactured east/west divide back.
Id love to leave it back there, except everyone on .world is celebrating the Tiktok ban because 'those sneaky Chinese were stealing their data'. Half of .world believes China is a dictatorship with xi being a king. This level of propaganda didn't end in the 1950s.
As some ~~wise~~ famous guy once said: Just sell your house and move!
BOOTSTRAPS, PEOPLE. BOOTSTRAPS!
I don't love the implication that those displaced by disaster are somehow different than "normal" houseless people, though I'm sure that wasn't the intent behind the meme.
I think it's more about "these rich people will finally get some little taste of how hard it is to live without a home."
Except some of them won't. Those who are truly wealthy will already have other houses, or be able to buy or rent a temporary home while waiting to rebuild. If they already had empathy they'll realize how comparably " inconvenient" rather than"desperate" their situation is. The others will whine, and use it as a reason to be even shittier to the homeless.
There's a lot of people also who aren't wealthy, they have just owned a house in the Palisades from way back when it wasn't so expensive, or lived in the trailer park. They too already have attitudes re homeless people, which may or may not evolve.
I think anyone who's unhoused, it's the result of a disaster, whether a public or private one.