this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
80 points (94.4% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27453 readers
1149 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 65 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Tankie mods on world are criticized for being too tankie in moderation.

Admins try to address this by forcing mods to argue instead of immediately ban if something is posted against their beliefs.

A non-tankie mod thinks it is bullshit that they have to engage in every online argument in good faith and takes their subs (I know this isn't the official term but it communicates the idea) dark in protest.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

fucking tankies are here to ruin yet another alternative social network. Every. Single. Time. Be it alt-right nuts or alt-left ruining the party for everyone.

[–] john89@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

While I don't agree with the 'tankie' rhetoric (it's been thrown around so much that word has no meaning here), mod abuse has definitely gotten out of control across most online communities.

It's opening up an opportunity for communities that don't tolerate mod abuse to flourish.

The mods only have themselves to blame. Hopefully these new communities won't repeat the same mistakes.

[–] SoftTeeth@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (19 children)

Why are right wingers the only ones who ever try to devalue the meaning of words?

If they don't like being called tankies or nazis they are free to chage their beleifs, same as you if you feel like you are being grouped in for your beliefs.

[–] john89@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 day ago

Yeah, this proves my point.

I'm not a tankie, nor am I a right-winger.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 26 points 3 days ago (6 children)

i still use sub. i dont think ill ever stop. like how podcasts are still called podcasts and they dont even make ipods anymore.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 76 points 3 days ago (14 children)

Short version: yesterday, Lemmy.world announced essentially, though they buried it under lots of distracting verbiage, that they were going to follow in the footsteps of Vichy Twitter and Meta and allow hate speech and misinformation, and probably more to the point, they intend to force recalcitrant mods to allow it regardless of their own views on the matter.

And the head mod/creator/whatever they are of unpopular opinion took exception to that and locked the community in protest.

[–] JonsJava@lemmy.world 38 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm another mod of the community. Admiral didn't let me know they were doing this.

I still 100% support their actions regardless.

load more comments (1 replies)

I just want to highlight the term "Vichy Twitter" because I really like that. Thank you.

[–] MissJinx@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I thought this couldn't happen in lemmy. Oh well...

[–] Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 days ago

This can certainly happen on Lemmy. And you can bypass it by setting up yourself and your communities on a different instance with more reasonable rules.

Lemmy can't change human nature. It does not restrict bad behavior. It offers alternatives. Everyone gets to choose among instances and communities. The hope is that people will shift away from the ones that become toxic when better options are always available. It tends to be a gradual process, but I think it is working.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 52 points 3 days ago (8 children)

You have to allow a little raw chicken in the mayo now.

So now people are to be allowed to sealion and troll and JAQ off in your community, so long as they do it respectfully.

Or else.

Imagine running, say, a community for vulnerable trans kids, and being forced to allow a constant influx of 'helpful suggestions', just so long as they're phrased in pretty language.

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well, time to make my alt community account my primary one. See y'all on the other side!

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I make them perna ban me first. Fuck them.

But yeah. Gtfo, and be carful, if the world is flat that means it has an edge.

[–] hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works 25 points 3 days ago (2 children)

https://lemmy.world/post/24135976

So they're trying cut back on echo chambers and power tripping mods. I like this, but I wonder how this going to play out.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 37 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (9 children)

We’re going to allow some “flat earth” comments. We’re going to force some moderators to accept some “flat earth” comments

You.. like this? Glad I'm not a mod, this is how places like Reddit became what they are today. Opinions should be allowed, but admins should be able to moderate blatant falsehoods.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We've already run into problems with that where mods banned people talking about Israeli war crimes as "misinformation". Despite it being headline news.

So that's obviously not a great system.

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] john89@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago

Yeah. I'd rather have people rely on citations and inquisition than trusting mods to keep misinformation at bay.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Reddit is a living emblem of the problem this is trying to solve so I have no idea what you mean.

Mods can’t be trusted to enforce the truth. It’s far too complicated and they invariably end up enforcing their own distorted view of the world instead.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Policy sentiments aside, wow that post is so up it's own ass. There was definitely a more concise way to communicate the change.

[–] Boozilla@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 days ago

I'm not an expert in political philosophy by any measure, but I kind of feel like lemmy.world is a small case study in the pros and cons of realpolitik.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Seems like they locked the community in protest of recent .world TOS changes. Although I think a much better protest would be to simply refuse to enforce the changes they felt are unsatisfactory.

[–] asudox@discuss.tchncs.de 35 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

...or just migrate the community to another instance? Like why are we in the fediverse? Have people forgotten that if you don't like a instance, you can just move to another one?

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Migration as a first choice is rash.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (22 children)

It's really not. The whole purpose of federation is that you can just go to whatever instance you like best.

load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

From the announcement in question:

Some communities will receive an immediate notice with a link to this new policy. The most egregious communities will comply, or their moderators will be removed from those communities.

Nothing like a good power trip from the admins. Even if mods are power tripping people can make a new community. This was a bad response by admins, they bowed to only the most vocal minority. Vast majority of people have been fine with the moderation on .world. only classy thing to do is to take it back and play it off like it was a trial run that didn't work out

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 12 points 3 days ago

.world continually making dumb changes

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›