this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
69 points (97.3% liked)

Linux

48937 readers
759 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/52165296

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 75 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is surely a smokescreen for Google's monopolization of Internet standards.

And even if weren't, I cannot emphasize enough how much that list of companies should also NOT be in charge of setting open standards. Oligopoly, monopoly with the illusion of choice...

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca -5 points 1 day ago

Oh, surely.

Wait. Non-profits looking to shepherd the upstream used by a dozen derivatives; that's BAD now?

[–] franzcoz@feddit.cl 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Vincent@feddit.nl 16 points 1 day ago

we remain committed to being the responsible steward of the Chromium project

https://blog.chromium.org/2025/01/announcing-supporters-of-chromium-based.html?m=1

So this neutral space is still subservient to Google's whims.

[–] eskuero@lemmy.fromshado.ws 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Google could be forced to sell Chrome" was the news in late november so I guess this a reaction to that.

[–] fin@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I want Chrome to be sold, honestly.

I still don't get why Linux Foundation helped Google out of that.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I still don’t get why Linux Foundation helped Google out of that.

I could be wrong, but I think that (at least to some extent) the Linux Foundation exists to be the more corporate-friendly face of ~~Free Software~~ Open Source, as a reaction against/in opposition to the hard-line "end-user freedom" stance taken by GNU/the FSF. If that's accurate, it doesn't surprise me that it would take a soft position regarding Google's monopolistic practices. Especially since Google is a gold member of it.

[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Aren't a good portion of contributors to the Linux kernel also employees of the major FAANG companies?

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So the Linux Foundation is in Google's pocket. Good to know,

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's a pretty unfair kneejerk without receipts.

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 23 hours ago

When it comes to a megacorp like Alphabet/Google, assuming foul play and bribery should always be the kneejerk.

[–] fin@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago
[–] jaypatelani@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

there’s a whole world of alternative, small, or minimalist non-Chromium non-Firefox browsers out there I would love to try out – but in today’s world, if it doesn’t support at least the full un-crippled version of uBlock Origin, it’s a complete non-starter

(considering general trends, I’m just gonna have to sit down and setup PiHole aren’t I?)

[–] yonder@sh.itjust.works 2 points 20 hours ago

I find the ad blocking in Gnome Web to be sufficient. The biggest thing that is holding it back in my opinion is a lack of features like extentions and FIDO support and moderate performance.