this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
473 points (94.7% liked)

linuxmemes

21748 readers
1179 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
     
    top 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] yukichigai@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 hour ago

    I'll settle for the old Rust approach, where you could still play on (or host your own) servers that didn't have anti-cheat enabled.

    [–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 22 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

    "Sir, a significant market segment says we're ignoring them."

    "Are they still giving us money?"

    "Yes sir."

    "Then fuck 'em."

    [–] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 4 hours ago

    anti cheat with kernel privilege access? No, thanks

    1000043234

    [–] creed10@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

    unfortunately for us, I don't think we're what they would consider "significant"

    [–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

    The steam deck be pretty popular these days.

    [–] mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

    Bully for you.

    When I eventually make the switch to Linux your efforts will make it even more seamless.

    [–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 hours ago

    I’m fighting for you!

    [–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

    The only game I currently play is KSP. I've grown so tired of all the crap out there.

    [–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

    Every so often I have an urge to come back and play KSP for like a month straight. And it's a blast every time.

    Sometimes a nice single player sandbox is all you need.

    [–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago

    Is it more stable? I always ended up getting either a kraken or like 2 fps with a giant space station.

    [–] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago
    [–] cm0002@lemmy.world 113 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (8 children)

    We need the game publishers to face more consequences for shoving BS kernel level anti-cheats and not focusing on where it actually matters, server-side.

    (Which would also solve the Linux AC problem by extension)

    [–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 47 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

    Game publishers: but server-side anticheat is ~~more expensive~~ HARDDDDDD

    [–] MudMan@fedia.io 24 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

    Most games I know about do both, but my understanding is it's hard to stop some of the client-side stuff server-side.

    Look, we've been here before. I'm not super invested in multiplayer stuff, so I don't care that much, but I am old enough to remember when gamedevs would not even try crossplay and just let the PC be the wild west when it comes to cheating.

    I didn't necessarily hate it. I lived in a world of dedicated servers where moderation and security came down to some kid in his underpants being pretty sure he didn't like you and kicking you out. I'm guessing there's a bit too much money and too much of an expectation of free-form matchmaking for the mass market to go back to that.

    But hey, I'm not a security software engineer and I'm not excessively involved in competitive shooters, which seems to be where most of the problem happens. My interest in this is having enough PC security for crossplay to make matchmaking in fighting games less of a hassle than it used to be in the Street Fighter 4 days. You sweaty FPS nerds can do whatever, as far as I'm concerned.

    [–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago

    You're right on all accounts, I oversimplified for humor. Server-side IS more expensive and does exist in limited ways. Rolling matches on dedi servers are highly profitable, unfortunately the old school days of matchmaking are over for everything except indie companies that want to replicate the nostalgia

    load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] Senseless@feddit.org 14 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

    Nearly 800 hours in Scum, now I can't play it anymore because it's missing Linux EAC support. Too bad.

    [–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 38 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

    No. It's a video game. Publishers have no business being in my kernel.

    [–] Voyajer@lemmy.world 37 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

    Anticheats on Linux don't have kernel access... Have you ever heard of people needing to type their root password to launch a steam game before?

    [–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

    Anticheats on Linux don’t have kernel access

    Yeah, I know. I'd like it to stay that way. Furthermore, this is also why games with kernel-level anticheat still don't work on linux, despite developments in wine/proton.

    [–] Rin@lemm.ee 4 points 5 hours ago

    Don't give corpos any ideas

    [–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 34 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

    Where did I say I wanted kernel anti-cheat?

    [–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

    The post is about anticheat that doesn't work on linux. Non-kernel-level anticheat works fine now thanks to wine/proton. That just leaves kernel-level anticheat. If a game has kernel-level anticheat, the studio is not going to remove it for the sake of a linux version. Therefore, to be compatible with linux, they would be introducing kernel-level anticheat into a linux version. To this, I say "fuck no".

    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 35 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

    I mean if the game you paid money for is deliberately broken to shaft you, you are a clown for reviewing the game positively. Judging by the complaints of every game with linux-breaking anti cheat, it has failed to remove any of the cheaters.

    [–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 16 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

    Nope, fuck that. I'm not running that anti cheat shit on my machines, I just won't buy it.

    [–] huskypenguin@sh.itjust.works 13 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

    Bro. That's not what is happening or being talked about. Most anticheat systems have a Linux flag that can be enabled, letting them run on proton without any sort of kernel access. Everything except Denuvo and fuck that shit in particular.

    [–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

    Denuvo et al are exactly what I'm talking about.

    [–] huskypenguin@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

    Yea. Well. Fuck those guys.

    [–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 12 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

    I’m not calling for kernel anti-cheat. I just want all the multiplayer games to work.

    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] yokonzo@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

    I dont disagree with this but i don't know about significant segment, thats kind of delusional

    [–] emb@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

    There are dozens of us!

    Yeah, I also wish they'd have better support, but Linux players are not a huge group.

    Steam Deck and Steam machines have helped a lot though. Without Valve's weight behind it, trying to game on Linux would probably be a lot worse.

    [–] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

    Yeah, I’m Linux-only and have been for the last 17 years, but we are not a significant percentage of the gaming market. Still less than 3% last time I checked.

    Otherwise, yeah fuck kernel anticheats that don’t even stop cheating.

    [–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

    Gamers will literally beg corpos to rootkit them.

    [–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

    That's a slippery slope argument from a post that just says all anti-cheat games should work, I did not say I support kernel anti-cheat.

    [–] Loid@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

    Not even slippery slope, that guy just manifested an argument out of his ass

    load more comments
    view more: next ›