this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
139 points (78.4% liked)

Data is Beautiful

1318 readers
11 users here now

Be respectful

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Devconsole@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Any chart with this clear of a result is suspect.

[–] Enkrod@feddit.org 10 points 2 days ago

Eh, if you leave out Fairphone the scoring range is realistic.

And Fairphone is specifically tailored to reach the highest realistically possible ethics standards. No wonder they crush this. The downside is that their phones are quite expensive relative to phones of comparable power.

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 90 points 2 days ago

Why are they including the samsung galaxy book, which is a laptop but not samsung phones, in a mobile phone comparison?

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Pixel being that low with long term software support seems whack as fuck.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

I mean 4/6 of the categories have very little to do with how good a phone is.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 60 points 2 days ago

full score on tech sustainability for the company that removed the headphone jack at the same they they releases Bluetooth headphones while their earlier models still can't call properly! Whoohoo

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 79 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Info on categories. looks like they're not even taking into account repairability in climate. I'd guess that's why apple is scored highly.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 days ago

I was wondering why on earth all these brands got full marks on climate. Absolute bogus table.

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 14 points 2 days ago

Worthless table, biased as fuck.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Data is always beautiful if you cherry pick the data you want.

This is like judging how beautiful someone is by only looking at their hands.

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Yeah, yeah, the Fairphone is very fair until you're forced to use their software because they're unable to collaborate with GrapheneOS because they leak keys, all their bootloader security is bullshit and they don't care about making it right.

[–] nshibj@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's true that there are issues preventing GrapheneOS from running on FairPhones, but you're not forced to use the standard OS: you can install other ROMs on FairPhone like LineageOS, CalyxOS, iodéOS, /e/

[–] zer0squar3d@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Who leaks keys? Can you provide me some reading material?

[–] tibi@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Why the arbitrary ethiscore classification (25% for average and 60% for good? Do they just want Apple to not be red?

[–] FundMECFS@slrpnk.net 27 points 2 days ago (14 children)

Can some investor pour 100 million or something into fairphone so the phones actually become good?

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 49 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

If it's your average investor, they'll want a return, which will make fair phone stop being ethical.

[–] FundMECFS@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Isn’t fair phone a for profit company? If it is, doesn’t change much.

If it is a non-profit, then that’s even better, lets get some philanthropist on it.

[–] theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

For profit and for infinitely exponentially increasing profit are two different business types.

[–] cybersin@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There are always exceptions to the rule, but the former usually turns into the latter given enough time.

Only if outside investment is involved. You can survive as a business by just doing good business for quite a while.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 10 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Other than being a bit thick, the Fairphone 5 is actually a very good phone.

[–] myfavouritename@beehaw.org 2 points 2 days ago

Totally agree. I prefer my Fairphone to nearly any other phone I've owned.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rollinghills@lemm.ee 10 points 2 days ago

It takes a lot of work and time to build smartphones.

The Pixel and the iPhone weren’t built overnight.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] baatliwala@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

They make ruggedized phones. I don't think they make normal ones.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I find it difficult to believe every chinese phone maker is evading taxes. It's also questionable how they manged to give an employee owned company, Huawei, a 0 for company ethos.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 40 points 2 days ago

The fact that the actual research is paywalled, and a lot of the scores seem to be about having the correct documents on your website, makes me a little sceptical of this.

https://www.ethicalconsumer.org/about-us/our-ethical-ratings

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Being employee owned doesn't magically make you a good company

[–] NotLuigi@hexbear.net 11 points 2 days ago

And being unionized doesn’t make you magically have higher wages, but they’re still highly correlated

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How is Google Pixel that low? They have good software support and support third party roms like GraphineOS better than nearly any other manufacturer.

[–] P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br 7 points 2 days ago

Software support doesn't excuses oor worker treatment

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Dang, wish I had enough money to afford an ethical phone =(

[–] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Good news, you (probably) can! Find a flagship phone you like from a year to three ago, and go buy a gently used one. Buying things used is almost always better for the environment than buying them new.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

So far I can't find anything that fits me better than a CMF Nothing Phone.

$240.

Fairly powerful hardware for that price range.

Apparently capable of running e/OS

A shape that has actual flat, easily gripable edges, as opposed to seemingly everything else that is completely rounded.

(I've got a serious wrist/hand injury to my dominant hand, and that makes this last one pretty important)

Is there anything comparable for all or most of those features, in that price range, capable of being either de googled android, or running an open source and/or privacy oriented os?

I've attempted to look for such a phone, and basically everything is either double or more the cost.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago

I wish I could pay more to make a phone I am buying more ethical.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

According to this chart... checks notes China bad.

[–] waigl@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've been using a shiftphone for the last ~5 years. I wonder where they would land on the ranking. They should als do fairly well.

[–] KryptonNerd@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 days ago

Oh they look cool!

[–] ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There is no ethical consumption under capitalism, no matter how warm and fuzzy the marketing team is able to make you feel.

load more comments
view more: next ›