this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
68 points (85.4% liked)

Games

33077 readers
1117 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 136 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Money (to stay in business, not for personal gain). Saved you a click.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago

Money.

I don't even have to read the article.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In most cases, acquisition seems to work out poorly for indie studios, but ND has certainly made good use of Sony's resources while they've been there. I'm just glad I get to play their games finally.

[–] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

This is one of those acquisitions that has been net positive for the industry. ND used that capital to push their games to the limit.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Because AAA games cost more to make than blockbuster movies, thus they need profit to match.

They take more art than a blockbuster movie, they take more script than a blockbuster movie, they take more motion capture than a blockbuster movie (except maybe the Avatar series which are basically all-CGI/motion capture), just everything is so much more than what you need in a film plus the need for compelling gameplay with a satisfying ludonarrative.

The massive amounts of capital needed to make one to begin with literally preclude studios that aim for this style of game from doing anything but submitting to large publishers who will finance them. Because the resources required to make that type of game are just that much.

It's part of why Larian did Early Access for BG3 so they could make money during the development to help lengthen their runway and lower their burn rate. They still had to cut a huge amount and just release as-is. The Upper City got cut entirely as did the return to Avernus and with it Karlach's actual happy ending, all of her current canon endings are technically fail-states for her storyline.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

They've also been one of the drivers of ballooning AAA costs, because everyone has to compete at the level of The Last of Us

[–] simple@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago

FYI Naughty Dog was acquired by Sony in 2001, this was before extremely expensive AAA games.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Larian also sold 30% to Tencent because they needed more money. Games can get super expensive quick.