this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2025
912 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

60287 readers
3412 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“Apple CEO Tim Cook plans to donate $1 million to Donald Trump's inauguration fund, reports Axios. The donation will be a personal donation directly from Cook rather than a donation from Apple”

I’ll defend Apple as being the least shitty of the big tech giants but I can’t defend this.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] schwim@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago

It's less than .05% of his worth. It's like us dropping pocket change in the Red Cross bucket and he'll make more than that in profit from changes the bribe paid for from the great cheetoh.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A rich white cis gay man backstabbing trans people?

This never happens, I'm shocked!

[–] JamesFire@lemmy.world 64 points 3 days ago (16 children)

I’ll defend Apple as being the least shitty of the big tech giants but I can’t defend this.

Why would you do that though? The only thing I'm aware of that they do even remotely better than anyone else is privacy. But it's not that much better, and it comes at the cost of gestures at everything else

[–] ratel@mander.xyz 47 points 3 days ago (1 children)

IDK why people say they have better privacy: They just settled a lawsuit over evesdroping using Siri. I think they probably have less interest than Google in selling data for advertising, mostly likely using it internally for their ecosystem so they probably come across more privacy focused but I assume they snoop just as much as any other big tech company.

[–] dan@upvote.au 20 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

less interest than Google in selling data for advertising

Google don't sell data. The data is what makes them valuable, so it wouldn't make sense. If they did sell data, the other big tech companies would just buy their data to remove their competitive advantage.

What Google actually sells is your attention. Advertisers can target people based on demographic data, things you like, etc, but the advertiser never sees the data used for targeting.

You can use Google and Facebook's Ads Manager sites yourself and see exactly what advertisers see.

On the other hand, Apple mostly keep their collected data for their own ad network. Yes, they have one - it's mostly just used for ads for "recommended" apps in the app store, but last I heard, they have plans to expand it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They just settled Siri snoop case for a fee pennies...

"Privacy"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Fades@lemmy.world 322 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Pathetic thinly veiled bribe

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 147 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Or it is protection money. “Nice apple you got there, would be a shame if anyone took a bite out of that”….

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 66 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why would Tim Cook be assosiated with Apple in trumps mind?

Apple is owned by Tim Apple.

Kind of strange that this line cook is able to afford a small 1 million dollar loan.......what? You think trump knows that a loan is different than a donation? You think he knows you're supposed to pay back loans?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RubberDuck@lemmy.world 137 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Imagine being a woman working for Apple and having a CEO who funds a rapist.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 148 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Imagine being an openly gay CEO who funds a party who hates gays

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 62 points 3 days ago (4 children)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago

No, they hate all gay people. They are just lower on the list right now, but they are definitely there.

First they came for....

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 82 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Why does such a thing as an inaugural fund exist? Seems like it's just to facilitate more corruption!

[–] m4xie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 48 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It doesn't usually. The 'why' in the case is because Trump and his team refuse to sign the ethics agreement to get the normal funding from the government.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 44 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Thanks, it must be amazing for Americans to have a president who won't sign a standard ethics agreement.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jinni@sh.itjust.works 77 points 3 days ago (14 children)

As a Bi man there is something that particularly stings about a well known, openly gay CEO funding a man who is hateful towards LGBTQ+ people. I never really liked him nor apple but it is an extra fuck you.

Being rich is ultimately the disease as it compels him to appeal to power but I hope the last things hears is "Told you I would kill you last".

[–] UpperBroccoli@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 3 days ago (1 children)

His in-group is not LGBTQIA+, it is other rich people. The same is true for all of them.

[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 days ago

The wealthy all seem to understand that class solidarity is more important than any other issue. Why is it taking so long for everyone else to figure that out?

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

No matter how much money they spend on this party they're still celebrating putting a convicted con man in the White House - whoopeee! - while the chumps who voted for him say, "What... my meds aren't covered anymore?"

Congratulations on flushing your country down a solid gold toilet, "conservatives".

[–] ghostpony@infosec.pub 106 points 3 days ago (2 children)

He’s doing this to avoid being associated with Apple, but this only highlights that he’s personally a piece of shit, in addition to Apple.

Fuck him, fuck Apple, and fuck all those other motherfucking bootlickers enabling these fucking fascists.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 44 points 3 days ago (3 children)

What's funny (or sad) is that 100 years from now this will be looked at the same was as when Ford or IBM supported the Nazis. Their business won't hurt long term and Tim Apple will be long dead.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 39 points 3 days ago

Gross. Sick of rich assholes enabling the fascist.

[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

I’ll defend Apple as being the least shitty of the big tech giants but I can’t defend this.

You can defend settler colonialism?

[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 71 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It really is a class war, not a culture war.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 54 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

These CEOs are funding hate, violence and the end of American democracy - they have enough power, money and influence to oppose, yet they don't. They decided that a few must be sacrificed for the greater ~~good~~ profit.

Something happened on the 4th of December. Today is the 4th of January. Just in case anyone's calendar app is stuck closed. Interesting if true...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago

Absolutely disgusting

[–] TheLastOfHisName@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago

Paying largesse/protection money.

[–] rauls4@lemm.ee 122 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 82 points 3 days ago (3 children)

This is one of the reasons why I am gradually untying myself from the Apple ecosystem, and all of propriety/big tech; especially US based.

When push comes to shove capitalism will not resist fascism. They will ignore all stated virtue signals and choose profits.

Choosing E2E encrypted FOSS products, that are interoperable with FOSS standards/formats and do not lock you into walled gardens, are the only viable long term solution.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LuckyPierre@lemm.ee 56 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They're being shaken down. Same as Mark Zuckerberg being summoned to a meeting with Trump and the next day paying $1m to the same fund.

I'm betting these meetings went something like, "You don't want a president as an enemy, do you? Cough up."

And don't think of it as a tax on the rich - it's not going towards the benefit of the American people. It's extortion.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They’re all “donating” the same amount.

And also this is the largest inaugural fund in history. In comparison to his previous which was $107m this is so far over $150m.

Considering Bidens and both of Obamas were between $50m and $70m is this not ringing alarm bells with anyone? Or is this something to “look” in to in like 7 years time when no one gives a shit.

Beggars belief.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 1 day ago

This is how things are going to work going forward.

Even if it is illegal, these people are above the law. Internet just exposing obvious corruption.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 65 points 3 days ago (6 children)

All these Billionaires PAYING Trump MILLIONS of Dollars is PROOF he CANT be Bought!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] bulwark@lemmy.world 108 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Amazon, Meta, Uber, OpenAI's Sam Altman, Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Coinbase, Toyota, Ford, GM, AT&T, Black & Decker, and Charter Communications are also making donations to Trump's inauguration fund.

I guess I never really paid attention before but is it normal for companies to donate to an inauguration fund? It sure seems like a government sanctioned protection racket.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 50 points 3 days ago (4 children)

This country makes me sick to my stomach. What a fucking joke.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Paying his tribute to the king. He'll have to donate more if he wants to usurp Elon. How much has Zuck donated?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jared@mander.xyz 72 points 3 days ago

Fuck Tim Apple

[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 57 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Have inauguration funds always been a thing? Or is this a Trump thing? What’s the purpose?

I can understand campaign funds. But if you’ve won I don’t know if I understand a candidate specific donation after the fact.

[–] bluemellophone@lemmy.world 70 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Previous administrations have used special government funds that are dedicated to the transition and inauguration. This comes with obvious restrictions and ethics requirements since it is taxpayer money.

Trump has decided to not use this money and get donations instead, which allows him and his incoming administration to skirt the normal mandatory reporting, disclosures, and rules.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

I guess it was that or a blow job.

[–] harmsy@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Meh, I was never going to buy their shitty crap anyway.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] finley@lemm.ee 70 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (11 children)

Bad gay!

When you’re a traitor to your own kind for the sake of an unquenchable thirst for profit, you become an enemy to LGBTQ+ folks. Siding with the neo-Nazis only makes it worse.

Fuck you, Tim Apple

Steve Jobs would have fired you the instant he thought you might do this. He might’ve been a legendary prick for his entire career, but at least he had a set of ethics and morals.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Gork@lemm.ee 64 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's not going to make him remember your actual name, Tim.

You'll always be Tim Apple to him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] solomon42069@lemmy.world 54 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Tim Cook is hoping to be spared when Trump starts purging gay people.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Way to go, Tim Apple

load more comments
view more: next ›