this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
1115 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

60187 readers
1734 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Suck it micro USB, mini USB, and lightning! πŸͺ«πŸ”‹

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago

USA checking in.

Just bought a new USB-C charging beard trimmer on clearance.

Feels good, man.

Thamks if EU helped.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 103 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Now for those swappable batteries

[–] Fishamatician@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

And make all power tool batteries compatible.

[–] tht@social.pwned.page 27 points 2 days ago

That's actually the next goal

[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 38 points 2 days ago (15 children)

Including cars.

Drive in, swap non-proprietary batteries with an autoloader, drive out. Done.

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This sounds great until you've had to repair an old car.

Everything rusts, warps, etc. The same things that make it hard to change your brakes will make it hard to change the battery pack, and you're expecting a robot to do it for you (and fast!).

There were companies built on this idea. I think they've all gone under at this point.

[–] locahosr443@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The things that seize do so because they are infrequently operated/removed so I don't see that being the main issue with this.

It still ain't happening any time soon though...

Aside from not having to charge I think the biggest benefit to this would be charging the packs off peak to even out grid load, or when there is excess solar etc.

[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 15 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Yes and no. No need to hot swap massive EV batteries. Rapid is fast enough. But yes so the EV can be upgraded. The batteries go obsolete quicker than they degrade. So make it so we can swap the batteries and keep the rest running. In fact, just right-to-repair the whole car. In fact, the whole everything!

[–] DrownedRats@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Hot Swapping batteries is actually surprisingly good for the life of the battery if done well.

Rapid charging the battery does do permenant damage over time especially if you fast charge every time. Whereas if you can hot swap a battery and have a suitable stockpile of them you can trickle charge the battery over a couple of hours instead of 30 mins and prolong the overall lifespan of the battery. Even slowing down the charge rate to 1 hour reduces wear on the battery significantly. Plus, without time pressure from a customer, more time could be taken to replace damaged cells or blocks in a battery so that one pack will more effectively use the whole battery up instead of throwing away perfectly good cells.

load more comments (3 replies)

In fact, just right-to-repair the whole car. In fact, the whole everything!

Boy, that escalated quickly

But yes, please.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

That is something that I wish would come true. This would also open EVs to the industry in some new ways. Currently it kinda sucks if you have machines that have to be able to run the whole day without big interruptions. When you're able to just swap the batteries in like 5 Minutes this machines don't have to rely on fossil fuels that much and are open to be replaced by electric ones.

What I'm thinking about are machines like tractors for farming. During the summer it happens that they are running for 8+ hours without interruptions. Building a battery this big will be quite challengening. However, if you're able to swap out the batteries after like 2 hours and then continue with work you effectively solved one of the biggest problems with not that much of a hassle.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] tht@social.pwned.page 45 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thx EU, I live in the the land of the fee but will benefit from you forcing apple to be compatible.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Don't buy Apple to be compatible.

[–] tht@social.pwned.page 12 points 2 days ago

Just don't buy apple

[–] Retrograde@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Don't buy Apple ~~to be compatible~~.

Couldn't agree more mate

I don't but my kids do and I'm forced to maintain their crap at work.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Does this law allow for any standards progression or is it USB-c forever?

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago

Kudos to the EU, end the waste.

[–] ad_on_is@lemm.ee 41 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Can we bring back the charging as well, and not just the USB cable... Oh, and while you're at it, screws instead of glue, to replace batteries would be awesome.

Thx!

[–] RacerX@lemm.ee 45 points 2 days ago (4 children)

There's a rule coming into effect in 2027 that enforces user replaceable batteries for devices in the EU. https://www.pcmag.com/news/eu-smartphones-must-have-user-replaceable-batteries-by-2027

[–] ad_on_is@lemm.ee 18 points 2 days ago (5 children)

while 2027 is better than nothing, I still wonder why it took them so long. Glue in smartphones has been around for probably a decade now.

Also, I think, anything that has a battery, should be user replacable... even teeny-tiny earbuds.

[–] ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

To allow the manufacturers to adapt and phase out?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 90 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Eu once again doing more to improve my life than my own government (tax holiday).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Walican132@lemmy.today 108 points 3 days ago (64 children)

My only concern with this law, is that what happens when USBC is no longer the best option. Idk how to express what I’m saying but what if USB-G ends up being 1000x as fast. Does this law allow for chargers to evolve and if so, how? I admit I haven’t looked into this but I’ve been wondering about it.

I’m 99% wireless these days so I wouldn’t be surprised if chorded chargers are largely on their way out, but I’m still curious.

[–] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 322 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Manufacturers are allowed to add supplementary charging standards on top of USB-C PD, and the commission is required to review the landscape every 5 years to see if a new technology is better than USB-C that should be adopted in the future

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv%3AOJ.L_.2022.315.01.0030.01.ENG&toc=OJ%3AL%3A2022%3A315%3ATOC

[–] Walican132@lemmy.today 118 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Awesome! I knew by commenting someone educated would come along. Thank you very much.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] abfarid@startrek.website 51 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (38 children)

USB-C doesn't have speeds, it's just a connector type. USB 1, 2, 3-3.2, 4 etc. is the protocol responsible for speed. You can have a USB-C connector with any implementation (except maybe USB 1). It can even do DisplayPort stuff.
So for USB-C to become irrelevant we need to come up with a better connector form factor. Which is unlikely to happen soon. But also, same thing happened with USB-B Micro connector (colloquially called micro USB), it was designated as a standard (but Apple managed to get an exemption) and manufacturers had no issues moving to a better connector, which is USB-C.

load more comments (38 replies)
load more comments (62 replies)
[–] WhatSay@slrpnk.net 44 points 3 days ago (6 children)

The benefit is that by being standardized, there will be less proprietary cords and adapters. And the capability of USB-C should be adequate for sometime with the power and data transfer.

One issue, is that not all USBC cords are of the same quality. I found this recently when trying to find a cord that can be used for an external SSD, and video for a monitor. Some cords worked, the rest did not. All the cords could be used for charging, but after that, all bets are off.

load more comments (6 replies)

Praise the EU

[–] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 11 points 2 days ago

With the iPhone 14 no longer being sold the specs of the rumored SE 2025 make a lot more sense.

[–] arc@lemm.ee 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (18 children)

While this is good news, the likes of Apple will still find ways to be "compliant" while still being total assholes about it. e.g. the device might charge with USB C but they'll gimp the data transfer rates on non-pro phones. And they'll do the same when mandates about repairability come in - all of a sudden the battery will have a bunch of expensive DRM'd up the ass circuitry attached to it that will cripple the phone if its not recognized or registered by one of their techs and means Apple can kill old phones by being "out of stock" of the battery.

This is absolutely true,however the EU has proven to be not someone you mess with. Apple has already tried shenanigans to stop side loading and got beaten by the EU to comply with the rules.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] uis@lemm.ee 16 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Only suck it lightning. It still allows standard chargers like micro USB and mini USB

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί