this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
131 points (83.9% liked)

Technology

60133 readers
2781 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lurklurk@lemmy.world 26 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The headline overreaches as the article doesn't support the passport dying as much as some early exploration into potential digital variants, and some convenience efforts to not have to show the passport.

Dying would be "most people use the digital variant, it's accepted everywhere and we're phasing out the paper variant".... which sounds like it might happen on the same timeline as large scale fusion energy

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 20 hours ago

Clickbait/Ragebait Journalism in a nutshell.

[–] maidenthailand@lemmy.world 180 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Literally shoot me if this becomes a reality. I don't want my ability to travel to be dependent on something with a steadily dying battery.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 day ago

Not just a dying battery, but a fragile screen, malware, and a tendency to get stolen.

[–] scytale@lemm.ee 64 points 1 day ago (8 children)

If anything, I wish they made passports into the size of a regular ID so it fits in a wallet/cardholder and you don’t have to worry about it getting folded or wet. Make visas and stamps digital so a chip scan of the card provides all the info, instead of eye/face recognition/tracking.

[–] gazter@aussie.zone 5 points 20 hours ago

That would be great, sure- but all I really want is boarding passes to be the same size as the passport. They go together, so why don't they make them so they actually go together?

Angrily tries again to read seat number, obscured by the rumpled creases from the bit that sticks out from the passport getting folded in a pocket

[–] tray5895@feddit.nl 3 points 23 hours ago

If you are in America, you can get a passport card!

The card is for U.S. citizens who travel by land and sea from Canada, Mexico, Bermuda, and some Caribbean countries.

The link also mentions you can use it in place of other id cards in domestic flights, but I've heard some TSA agents don't believe it exists.

Certainly not as useful as a full blown passport, but it is a thing. I am hoping it gets more usage over time.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago

I think the problem with a digital passport is that while that's fine in very developed countries, you'll alwadys need a physical human readible stamp to show authorities when they don't have a digital reader.

[–] rycee@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

For many years now whenever I travel within EU I use my EU identity card and it's very convenient. Would indeed be great if I could use something like it outside EU as well.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 23 hours ago

You probably can, not just in non-EU Schengen countries (i.e. EFTA) but also a couple of other select places. E.g. Egypt will let you in with a German ID card if you have two extra images with you so they can issue you a small cardboard visa. Wouldn't recommend it in Egypt though, banks, hotels etc. might not recognise ID cards.

But that's really the main issue: The country will have to issue a visa and that has to be recorded in some way. It could, in principle, be completely electronic and online, but that requires that their IT systems can actually use the electronic features of your ID card and that everyone who might have to check your visa has to have a card reader and a connection to the state's servers.

[–] randomname01@feddit.nl 8 points 1 day ago

Rationally I agree, but at the same time I actually really like the passport booklet. I don’t know, it feels so much more official.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They do in the US if you live in a border state, but it's only valid for Mexico/Canada. Think the idea is having space for physical visa stamps, but I don't see why they'd prefer that to a digital visa tied to something unique in the passport.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The passport card is good for boats and driving, not for flying.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah. The fact that our my country's primary ID document is an easily-damageable paper booklet is very annoying, especially given the fact that in 99% of cases, only one page - the laminated one with the name and photo - is needed! That page could easily be a plastic card.

[–] j4yt33@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In my passport that page is basically a plastic card, same as my ID card, just a bigger format

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I only recently learned that English word for "Passport" refers to the document needed for travelling - and yeah, ours also have a plastic card like this. But weirdly, the actual internal ID which is used a lot more just has a laminated paper page in this place.

[–] j4yt33@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

Before they made the ID a plastic card we also used to have a laminated piece of paper as ID. I agree, it's not very convenient!

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

You can get a US passport card. It only works for Canada Mexico and some Caribbean islands though. The tech is already there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

From the article, it sounds more like they're using shared databases and facial recognition more than smartphones or similar. So they'd presumably have the requisite devices at customs.

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 43 points 1 day ago (4 children)

That doesn’t sound better. I get the shared databases, though it does introduce security issues. But the facial recognition that’s been proven flaked and flawed and based on biometric data that can be leaked and never changed… no thank you.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

New film plot: the airport's facial recognition system can't tell the difference between the intended copilot and their identical twin, a terrorist. Question is, is it a comedy about bureaucracy or an edge-of-your-seat thriller?

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

"Starring Dwayne Johnson and Kevin Hart"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] thbb@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't have a mobile phone. How is that supposed to work? Will owning a specific object and attached subscription to a private entity be mandated by law?

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

More and more not complying with digitalization will get you into trouble. I don't think it will be mandatory but expect to run into delays, similar to how you technically have the right to refuse the x-ray-like machine at airport security, but doing so is time consuming, everyone will hate you for it, and cause you significant delays, on top of making you look suspicious.

And it sucks.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I quit flying (domestically, at least) over the x-rays and TSA bullshit. I'm driving 13 hours today in order to avoid that particular security theater.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Can't wait for high speed rail to be common and cheaper in Europe. I just hate everything about airports and flying. I already only fly if I have time constraints. I'll gladly take a train for 10 hours instead of a 1 hour flight (which requires more than 1 hour commuting, being 2 hours early, waiting for luggage, then commuting back, so that 1 hour is more like 4).

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

Trains in the US are starting to have some of the same security measures as airlines... :(

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“You'll own nothing and you'll be happy”

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I mean, you never owned your passport, ever.

If you look at the very first page, it says “ property of the US government” and then there’s some blurb about tampering being a felony.

Same thing for a diver’s license. You don’t own it, your state does.

I do agree that moving to digital identification is a huge mistake. It’s too easy to lose access to a digital device or account. Or have it spoofed in some way. I’d much rather have a physical ID that won’t run out of battery or have a glitch that makes accessing it impossible for an unknown length of time.

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 24 points 1 day ago

Thats a bit tame, first page of the British passport is:

"His Britannic Majesty's Secretary of State requests and requires in the name of His Majesty all those whom it may concern to allow the bearer to pass freely without let or hindrance and to afford the bearer such assistance and protection as may be necessary"

Oi you, this is my mate and you're going to look after him, alright.

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

Plus the republicans would lose their damn minds over this prospect. E-ID for elections? Never.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

I heard Luigi shot the paper passport as a warmup.

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 58 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'll add this to the list of things that were working just fine that we're about to break along with using a passport to board a plane.

[–] humble_pete_digger@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is no way EU will go along with this passport alternative, no matter how much google and apple lobby them

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago

Germany will be thst last country to allow such level of digitalization.

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 50 points 1 day ago
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (4 children)

“One day there will be no borders, no boundaries, no flags and no countries and the only passport will be the heart” - Carlos Santana

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 35 points 1 day ago

But also we'll track everyone everywhere they go, with facial recognition.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] moe90@feddit.nl 17 points 1 day ago
[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

No it's not? Literally just got a new passport and they didn't say anything about digital passport

[–] codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is called manufacturing consent. News media tells you what future the elites want so it seems inevitable and desired when they force it through. Alternative futures can never be considered.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 14 points 1 day ago

This is called manufacturing consent.

Lives on my shelf.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have 3 passports, how does it know which one I want to use?

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 3 points 22 hours ago

The "solution" to this will be that you'll only be allowed to have one at a time. Choose and choose wisely. Changing will mean a huge amount of paperwork each and every time.

Inconvenient? Tough. Unless you're rich.

There'll be a tier of "known persons" who will be allowed travel without needing a passport, a bit like how it already works for the British monarch (and probably others I don't know for sure about).

load more comments
view more: next ›