this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
1558 points (99.2% liked)

Games

32946 readers
945 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Clown emojis all around

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 390 points 6 days ago (23 children)

this is starting to be horseshit. Every windows computer has a version of fucking solitare on it , there are other card based games that don't get this treatment, and the lootboxes are actual gambling.

I thought at the start it was a type of beurocratical problem, but it's been too long.

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 156 points 6 days ago (10 children)

Not entirely sure about the European PEGI, but the American ESRB is funded by the same companies that it regulates. It was created after the outcry about violent games and was the industry self-regulating to avoid the government getting more involved.

It is a lobby group for the industry, for better and in this case very much for worse.

I assume PEGI is little different.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 63 points 6 days ago (2 children)

PEGI and many other groups are private groups. They're not an authority of any form. They're not associated with government, public regulation, or public election. They're a group of people that create their own standards outside of the ISO or any actual regulation representing the public.

Some countries do have actual public systems, but many just have these private groups that know best.

[–] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago (7 children)

They're private groups that do the ratings but ESRB is enforced by laws in some Canadian provinces for instance and PEGI is enforced by law in some European countries. They do have a de facto authority in those places as a publisher can't just decide to disregard their ratings and sell to minors anyway or something.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 20 points 6 days ago

To clarify: the ESRB is the rating arm. The ESA that runs it? That's the lobbying arm.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 145 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

He probably forgot to funnel millions of dollars to non-profits and businesses adjacent to PEGI decisionmakers and their family members. Rookie mistake.

[–] caut_R@lemmy.world 146 points 6 days ago (5 children)

They haven’t understood the game at all, I wonder if they even looked at it for more than two minutes

Run game > see playing cards and poker chips > close > PEGI 18

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 93 points 6 days ago

They're not looking into blatant gambling in AAA titles, of course they won't take a closer look into an indie game. They're completely useless.

[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Ah, but there are also tarot cards, which is spooky Occult voodoo magic. Balatro backwards might spell "Satan is Lord" in some ancient druidic script.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] derpgon@programming.dev 109 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Fuck PEGI, their ratings always sucked and weren't useful at all. Full blown swearing? 13+. One cigar through 500 hours of gameplay? Adults only. Never cared, never will.

[–] rimjob_rainer@discuss.tchncs.de 44 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Violence and gore? 13+. Some boobs? Adults only.

Killing good, love bad.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 17 points 6 days ago

If anybody knows about love it's rimjob_rainer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip 121 points 6 days ago (11 children)

Windows comes bundled with solitaire. How is it allowed in schools?

[–] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 136 points 6 days ago (7 children)

I think the current microsoft version of solitaire has microtransactions and ads so is actually significantly worse

[–] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 59 points 6 days ago (2 children)

They added micro transactions and ads to fucking solitaire? How have I not heard about this till now...

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 37 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This isn't really new. Solitaire has had ads for over a decade now since Windows 8, and there is a monthly premium subscription to remove them. As I understand it they also don't show during offline play, but might be wrong about that.

[–] redhorsejacket@lemmy.world 52 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Offline play? It's SOLITAIRE. Offline play should be the ONLY play, by default.

Feeling like I took crazy pills this morning...

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 20 points 6 days ago (8 children)

Why, how, the fuck do you add microtransactions to fucking solitaire?!

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 27 points 5 days ago

Might as well go all in on that new rating.

Balatro 1.5 Patch Notes.

  • All the Jokers now hang dong.

  • Big naturals Queens are worth double.

[–] umbraroze@lemmy.world 62 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Hngh. Balatro already had a bunch of hassle on Switch eShop due to the PEGI ratings change.

Earlier, Nintendo somehow got a PEGI 12 rating for 51 Worldwide Games, which includes poker and blackjack. I wonder what they argued to avoid the 18 rating. "Sure, this compilation has poker and blackjack, but it's not like we made it fun." (It's adequate but compared to Balatro it's very much a non-frills experience.)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tlou3please@lemmy.world 78 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I wish lawmakers had some balls on this subject. If there's gambling, they should have to register as a gambling company and comply with all the other restrictions on gambling advertisements in each jurisdiction.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 71 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (8 children)

The problem here is that Baltaro does not have gambling. It just uses cards and chips as the basis for playing the game. Like Magic the Gathering or Inscryption.

[–] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 49 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Using chips is even a stretch honestly. There are some chip imagery here and there but otherwise 'chips' are just how points are called.

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 46 points 6 days ago

Exactly you never actually commit to any sort of wager or even an imitation of financial risk.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Juigi@lemm.ee 21 points 5 days ago

NBA 2K literally had slot machine in it. System is corrupt.

[–] tino@lemmy.world 29 points 5 days ago (1 children)

let's just do like all parents buying the last Call of Duty to their 10-year-old and just don't give a fuck about PEGI.

[–] filcuk@lemmy.zip 9 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The thing is, this is likely going to affect their sales to some degree.
As a parent, you may have age lock on your child's account, or search games by rating, or just not know what this game is when asked to buy it but judging by rating.

I don't know how significant of an impact that is, but it's unfair.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago

When I was young I always wondered why the nhl games had a 16+ rating and Fifa had 3+. Figured both of them where ordinary sports.

Apparently fighting automatically shoots that nhl rating to the same level as GTA and balantro.

[–] moonpiedumplings@programming.dev 32 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 20 points 6 days ago

Gotta love how they saved the literal slot machine for a minute in to the video so it wouldn't be too obvious.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mudmaniac@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago

I'm hopelessly addicted to gatcha. When I saw this I bought Balatro.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 28 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Reminds me of that Australian law that was proposed to make anything with a relation to casino games Restricted 18 but merely mature for exploitative slot machine loot box mechanics.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 18 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I haven't seen Loot Boxes in a game in awhile, I kinda prefer those to FOMO...

I think the perfect system is you earn Loot Boxes by playing that can contain anything, but you can buy the specific things you want at any time, the boxes themselves are unlocked through gameplay.

Heroes of the Storm did this, and god I miss that game.

I wish DBD did it

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 21 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Are all game rating systems just complete and utter garbage? Dare you to find a good one.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 29 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Why is he still using Twitter? Does he want a bunch of Nazis replying to him?

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 32 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (11 children)

Because, unfortunately, millions of people still use it. If you're selling a product, it's in your best interest to have as much social media presence as possible.

Also, it's better to have an official presence on those platforms so others can't impersonate you as easily.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›