this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
510 points (99.0% liked)

News

23627 readers
2467 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

USPS plans to continue its EV transition despite resistance from Trump’s team.

Postmaster General Louis DeJoy affirmed the $3 billion electrification effort, funded by last year’s climate bill, as “business sense,” with 75% of the fleet targeted for electrification by 2026.

Trump’s team aims to cancel contracts, favoring gas-powered vehicles.

USPS has ordered 66,000 EVs by 2028, including vehicles from Oshkosh and Ford.

While critics argue against high costs, USPS maintains that legislative action would be required to halt its EV plans, which aim to modernize its 217,000-vehicle fleet.

all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 153 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

The only sane thing DeJoy wants to do. The USPS fleet is grossly outdated and electric vehicles make perfect engineering sense for distribution routes with lots of stop/start and idling. It'll lower their overall maintenance budget by tens of millions easy.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 118 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's happening despite DeJoy. He tried to commission ICEs with even worse mpg than the current fleet. Congress said hell no

[–] empty04@lemmy.world 62 points 1 week ago

despite DeJoy

Exactly this. Scrapping of automated sorting machines and reversal of fleet electrification plans were the first two things he did back in 2020.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sounds like simple math saved the day here.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago

More like Democrats were able to stop republicans from purposely making government inefficient.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Which ones were that? I know the ICE version of the NGDV was publicized as having similar gas mileage to the current LLV models, but that's with aircon turned on. The LLVs don't even have aircon.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's kinda hard to get worse MPG than the current LLV. The old iron duke engine aint exactly efficient. Plus the NGDV is a bigger car that can carry more. So if it gets the same MPG but is doing more work then is it really worse?

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Curb weight is an enormous efficiency factor for stop-and-go without regenerative braking. Old vehicles can be surprisingly efficient in certain areas if they’re light.

I guess it depends on how much more it carries, but it’s also “wasting” energy moving so much more around at once.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is the weirdest timeline. Here I am agreeing with DeJoy, who I've advocated be removed from office, literally for YEARS. smh.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 week ago

Even broken clocks that have been driven over by a semitruck can still be right twice a day.

[–] Cenzorrll@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Nah, you're good. They're moving forward with this despite DeJoy

[–] ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I need to know how anyone thinks ICE vehicles makes sense given these facts. Unless it’s some kind of bribe.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It’s literally a bribe. Fossil fuel companies handsomely funded Trump, publicly. ICE companies are courting him now.

The ostensible justification is that EVs are woke nonsense, like wind power. That’s it. But really they don’t even bother with that anymore, no explanation is required.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 63 points 1 week ago

Because Congress forced it to, after DeJoy tried to lock in an order for millions of 4 mpg shitmobiles

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wonder if people understand what a massive threat this is. The destruction of the United States Postal Service would be catastrophic. These private companies that are circling around here rely on the Postal Service. A lot of them only do the final leg of deliveries, if even that. They rely on the postal service for a lot of the in-between work. Meaning of the Postal Service collapses as they seem to be trying to cause then they'll be no one to cover the in-between Services except them. Meaning their prices will Skyrocket.

[–] ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m well aware I’m being obtuse here, but how did you get from electrification of USPS vehicles to the complete destruction of USPS?

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Trump tried to fuckup the post office during his last term.

Cancelling a project that is in progress and closer to its completion than its start will cause chaos and financial harm to the organization.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Just a reminder that Republicans have the Presidency, Congress, and the Supreme Court of the US. Enjoy the fossil fuels.

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hear that if you huff gas enough it all makes sense.

[–] formergijoe@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Make Gasoline Leaded Again!

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Gasoline
Oil
Petrol

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah yes, DeJoy is suddenly the defender of all things right with USPS because they held a sham "grilling" in the House. Please, give me a break.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

He's just another CEO tbh, but the only shred of credit I'm willing to give him is that he's not a profit ghoul by total choice, that would be the bill passed in 1970 in retaliation for the largest wildcat strike in US history. Nixon put the USPS into billions of debt.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

He's a self serving piece of shit that made fat donations to republicans and got installed with no prior experience to serve Trump's agenda of destroying USPS. His leadership have caused medicine deliveries to fail, food packages to expire, and put mail-in voting at risk. I won't let this congressional performance and the media's complicity in it white wash his record.

https://www.citizen.org/article/guaranteed-delivery-dejoys-post-office-corruption/

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

He's a self serving piece of shit that made fat donations to republicans and got installed with no prior experience to serve Trump's agenda

Like I said, just another CEO. I'm glad you added some context for this, because he's definitely a huge piece of shit tearing apart the fabric of a functional government.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To anyone thinking they agree with DeJoy allow me to rephrase this:

USPS maintains that legislative action would be required to halt its EV plans wink wink, nudge nudge

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

At the same time, laws can be challenged by blue states in friendly courts, tying things up. That's even if it passes. The house is down to 5 seats, many of them were mighty, mighty close. They will fuck us often mind you, but the mid hanging fruit will be hard to pluck. Rolling this back will affect 1000 jobs in Tennessee, so suddenly you have opposition in the GOP.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

The platform is drivetrain agnostic anyway, as the ICE engines wear out the chassis will accept the BEV drivetrain.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I'm excited for when my post man gets one.

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s still amazing that this South Carolina Republican would screw over his own constituents. For what benefit? To show loyalty to Trump? GOP is all about party over country.

[–] YippieKyeAy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I wonder if the new scout factory is his is district too. Interesting the state swoons these EV companies to invest in their state and then screw them over, actually not surprising it’s pretty on par for their party.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

So now we'll see that the president could have fired DeJoy all along.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Little boys want to have every vehicle go vroom vroom.

[–] Subverb@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I still think of the current LLVs as the "new" postal vehicles despite the newest of them having been built in 1994. When I was a kid they drove the cute little Jeeps.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

vehicles that do a lot of stop and go very locally. shit put solar panels on the roofs.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

People would have hated it, but if they partnered with Google years ago, they could have gotten street view hooked up to the USPS trucks and got updating street views and maps fairly regularly, while outsourcing some of the costs to them, probably 10 years to late though.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

As long as they don't go postal, all's good

[–] bulwark@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Do they have to make the mail trucks look so ... dumb? I'm all for shifting to electric but those look ridiculous.

[–] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They may look odd but the drivers love them miles above the current vehicles and they were built with safety in mind first. So yes, they look like that on purpose

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I can see how that deep windshield would help navigate tight spots / ensure you can see pets and children, low retaining walls, curbs, etc. These trucks mostly need to navigate surface streets and unfamiliar residential which can have tight spaces like long and narrow gravel driveways / access roads.

Makes total sense to me. Hope they have backup cameras too

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think it looks neat, and we’ll all get use to it just like we got use to calling a Nintendo console a “Wii.”

The unique proportions are to maximize visibility and safety. It’s not just trying to be odd to make a statement or to differentiate it.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 9 points 1 week ago

Like an elephant sat on the bonnet of a Fiat Multipla.

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

To hell with safety! Screw the comfort of the drivers that have to spend hours a day in it. Let's make sure @bulwark never has to look at something they find displeasing.