this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
420 points (93.4% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36167 readers
1233 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is a genuine question.

I have a hard time with this. My righteous side wants him to face an appropriate sentence, but my pessimistic side thinks this might have set a great example for CEOs to always maintain a level of humanity or face unforseen consequences.

P.S. this topic is highly controversial and I want actual opinions so let's be civil.

And if you're a mod, delete this if the post is inappropriate or if it gets too heated.

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Let he who is without sin cast the first stone

Or something

The ceo was a bad dude,

But murdering people isn’t cool.

Trump said he could murder a guy on Fifth Avenue,

Maybe this guy can murder a guy on Sixth Avenue.

πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

Edit: if he is some crazy cereal killer then I guess he has to get away with it the first time?

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 weeks ago

In most circumstances, I absolutely would not encourage vigilantism.

Millions of people effectively have no choice in their health care.

They are seeing friends and family die or become destitute because these companies refuse to give them the care they're paying for.

These companies own the government, and they indirectly write the laws.

They are making the decisions to make money rather than do their jobs and provide healthcare. They are literally taking our money and buying yachts and property instead of just paying for medical procedures and medication.

If this is what it takes for that all to change, I see no reason to make a martyr of him. It's the corporations that need to change, not the guy forcing them to.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Honestly? Not really, you can't fault him. But I'd really rather if the executives could actually go to jail.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] roofTophopper@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

It'll be interesting to see how this plays out and how long it goes on for. I feel like every other shooting, even school shootings these days get the "thoughts and prayers" treatment. Then it's onto the next news at six and who won last night's game.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

No! But we could slice the CEO into small pieces.... Accidentally.... And accidentally drop the pieces in resin and sell them on eBay? Then when you go in for a healthcare review, you come in wearing the pendant.... "Oh this? Its the tip of his penis! I paid $300 for it, it was cheap!"

load more comments (6 replies)

Don't give a shit if he's prosecuted for it, I'd be a bit pissed if a jury convicts him.

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Yes.

Not because I think what he did was wrong, but because I want his motives to go on record and possibly have a jury nullification, as although it is illegal to murder people; we have fostered a world where people might be driven to do this due to corporate greed.

Edit: It should be noted that I have consumed hundreds of articles on this topic, watched countless videos, and browsed thousands of threads online. I am yet to see a substantial amount of people condemning this action. Which speaks volumes that everybody is united in thinking this is fine and we have no issue with it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 10 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Yes.

Even in a unjust world mob justice isn't justice. This means a mob deciding someone is guilty and acting out punishment is unjust. But also a mob deciding a crime should go unpunished is unjust.

There's plenty wrong with how insurance works and plenty wrong with the justice system. But instead of giving up, we should be trying to fix these issues. It's all to easy to give in to our basic instincts and point to someone to blame. We punish them instead of fixing the issues. Killing one ceo might feel good, but it doesn't really change the big picture and in fact constitutes layer upon layer of failure. We should be better than that. History is full of people (singular and groups) being used as a scape goat to deflect and feel like something is being done, whilst in fact not actually fixing anything and just feeding hate.

Also in a capitalist world, the people with the most money have the most power. If we collectively decide it's open warfare, purge style distopia, they are going to have the upper hand. So purely from a self interest point of view, it would be better to work on fixing shit instead of reverting to monke.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Chozo@fedia.io 9 points 2 weeks ago

but my pessimistic side thinks this might have set a great example for CEOs to always maintain a level of humanity or face unforseen consequences.

I feel like that's your optimistic side speaking. My pessimistic side thinks this just encourages CEOs to hire more stringent security details, making themselves even more untouchable. I very much doubt that the intended lesson will be learned here.

[–] answersplease77@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

it's like someone revenging from the r4p1st of their daughter, who got away with it and was getting rich from it.
It is revenge from someone who destroyed their life. On top it's someone you don't have any legal route for justice against them.

So my answer is he should not be sentenced to anything more than 5 months max.

load more comments (1 replies)

No, and if they do find him, the jury should vote not guilty and utilize jury nullification.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I’ve already received a ban on LW for benign comment when this story broke (like lots of others) and this community is on LW so I won’t give my opinion, but instead point out that more communities should move away from LW (and I definitely don’t mean to ml)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Donebrach@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nah, seems like a good person tbh. Dude should be elected mayor and then eventually rebuild all of reality or whatever Arrow did.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 9 points 2 weeks ago

No. Not while there are people going hungry and living on the streets in the very same country those CEOs inhabit. If we have some semblance of equality I might just change my opinion.

[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ah, the old tug-of-war between justice and law.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pyrin@kbin.melroy.org 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

One way or another, he's going to be prosecuted. And that's just the reality of it. He can't run forever and he will be traced someday.

I'm just glad he did what so many Americans wish that they could do and continue daydreaming of doing.

[–] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, the case could go cold. People have gotten away with murder before. Granted there's a ton of extra scrutiny in this situation, but there's a definite chance.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Follow up question: what is the purpose of the law? Why does it exist? What does that tell as about this case?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] caboose2006@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, because murder is illegal. But if they never find the guy... That's okay too.

[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hell no. I hope they never find them. Just let it stand. The one who got away.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

I hope they never get the chance

[–] PixellatedDave@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

I would buy him a coffee

[–] nek0d3r@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

If that was a catalyst for many others to do the same instead of an isolated incident, we wouldn't have called it an assassination. We would have called it a revolution. In the kind of time and society we find ourselves in, this is the closest we'll ever get to a revolution. And I say, viva la revoluciΓ³n!

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I also believe he should face an appropriate sentence. What's the sentence for hunting without a licence in NY?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί