this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2024
86 points (94.8% liked)

World News

39210 readers
2043 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Rebels in Syria, led by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), have launched their first major offensive on Aleppo since 2016, threatening a potential shift in the 13-year civil war.

The attack targets a city historically vital to Syria’s economy, previously reclaimed by President Assad with Russian support.

This resurgence could destabilize the region, involving players like Russia, Turkey, and Iran, while creating openings for ISIS.

HTS, previously linked to al-Qaida, has sought legitimacy but remains controversial. The fighting raises concerns of regional escalation amid other Middle Eastern conflicts.

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 26 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Wow, I didn't realize this war was still ongoing, and 13 years old. I remember when this war broke out, and not only does it seem that long ago, but I thought it was pretty much wrapped up and the government won out.

Goes to show how much the media controls our knowledge on current affairs.

[–] Paragone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Because Assad's an ethnic-minority, he either has to genocide the entire country, XOR if he fails, then his life, itself, is hosed, from what I've read..

He CANNOT back-off & live.

_ /\ _

[–] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 19 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Syrian here. It was never exactly wrapped up. The government had strong momentum supported by its allies, but upon reaching the last stretch of rebel stronghold, they mysteriously stopped back around 2017-ish. What seems to have happened is Russia making a deal with Turkey and agreeing to stop.

Those remaining rebels have now launched a new offensive against the samw government army, but it is weaker than ever and severely lacking of ally support.

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 6 points 4 days ago

Thanks for the update. I hope you and yours are safe. What a terrible situation

[–] guy@piefed.social 1 points 4 days ago

No need to ease on the emergency measures as long as the war is on, eh?

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 10 points 4 days ago

"The war is not meant to be won, it is meant to be continuous."

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It's not war so much as an imperial invasion. If you think this is long, check out the history of iran, palestine, iraq, libya, afghanistan, vietnam, all of latin america, all of africa, etc.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Goes to show how much the media controls our knowledge on current affairs.

Not necessarily. It just means you aren't active enough to go out of your own information bubble. Plenty of news sources would mention many things.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

They probably meant the hegemonic narrative rather than just "news sources". Sure, there are alternatives but they're completely marginalized.

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This.

And a bit of what he's talking about. I live under a rock with isopods for the most part. I stopped watching the news on TV years ago, and have really reduced the effort I put into keeping up with world events because of how discouraging it is, and how much I've come to realize said narratives are primarily competing propaganda narratives.

It's insanely hard to find a modicum of truth in the sea of shit out there, and journalistic integrity has largely fallen by the wayside.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I also pretty much stopped watching TV as well. Online has more varied news sources.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It now appears like Russia put an overwhelming amount of their military might into Syria as their current invasion has revealed how ineffective their army actually is.

With vastly diminished Russian assets, Assad has a problem.

[–] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 days ago

Contrary to whats being thrown around, Russia's support hasnt shrank much. The major change was Hezbollah, which had to retreat from its positions in Syria to support the front against israel.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It's most important to know that this is extreme propaganda calling terrorists "rebels", etc. It's a continuation of the war on reality. Genocide is self-defense, etc.